Arkham annonce la « désanonymisation » de ZCash. Quelles transactions sont suivies

RBK-crypto2025-12-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-09 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

La plateforme d'analyse Arkham a annoncé avoir initié la "désanonymisation" des transactions de la cryptomonnaie Zcash, connue pour permettre aux utilisateurs de choisir entre des opérations privées ou publiques. Arkham affirme avoir identifié plus de la moitié (53%) des transactions du réseau Zcash, liant 420 milliards de dollars en ZEC à des entités spécifiques. Leurs outils incluent une surveillance des grosses transactions et une analyse comportementale via l'IA. Le créateur de Zcash, Zooko Wilcox, conteste le terme "désanonymisation", soulignant que les utilisateurs choisissent volontairement la visibilité de leurs portefeuilles. Malgré cela, le prix du ZEC a connu une hausse spectaculaire de 543% sur un an, atteignant environ 410 dollars, divisant la communauté entre partisans d'une revalorisation légitime et détracteurs criant à la manipulation orchestrée. Wilcox a rejeté les théories de "pump coordonné", qualifiant ces accusations de propagande cynique.

La plateforme d'analyse Arkham a annoncé avoir commencé la « désanonymisation » des transactions de la cryptomonnaie Zcash. Cette monnaie est connue pour permettre à l'utilisateur de choisir une exécution privée ou publique des opérations.

Arkham affirme avoir étiqueté plus de la moitié (53%) des transactions sur le réseau Zcash, qu'elles soient privées (shielded) ou ouvertes. Les analystes ont lié 420 milliards de dollars en ZEC à des personnes et organisations spécifiques. Les fonctionnalités d'Arkham pour surveiller l'activité de Zcash incluent la possibilité de recevoir des notifications sur les grosses transactions, ainsi que l'analyse des opérations via l'intelligence artificielle.

Comme exemple de suivi de Zcash, Arkham a attiré l'attention sur le fait qu'il y a huit ans, le gouvernement américain a confisqué 737 000 dollars en ZEC au fondateur d'AlphaBay, Alexander Cazes, qui ont pris de la valeur au fil des années. Actuellement, le gouvernement américain détient 1,26 million de dollars en ZEC.

Le créateur de Zcash, Zooko Wilcox, a déclaré qu'il ne s'agissait pas à proprement parler de désanonymisation, car les utilisateurs de ZEC décident eux-mêmes si leurs opérations seront visibles.

« Le titre d'Arkham laisse entendre qu'ils peuvent « désanonymiser » les propriétaires de Zcash. Mais en réalité, lorsque vous utilisez Zcash, vous choisissez vous-même si l'un de vos portefeuilles apparaîtra sur leur tableau de bord ou non », a écrit Wilcox.

À l'automne, après près de cinq ans d'accalmie, le prix du ZEC a été multiplié par près de dix depuis le début de l'année. Une telle hausse soudaine a provoqué une réaction vive dans la communauté crypto et l'a divisée en deux camps : les uns considèrent la croissance comme une réévaluation logique des caractéristiques fondamentales du projet, les autres comme le résultat d'une campagne massive et coordonnée pour le promouvoir.

Fin octobre, Wilcox a avoué ne pas savoir pourquoi le ZEC prenait autant de valeur et s'il allait redescendre. « Mais voici ce que je sais : les discussions selon lesquelles il s'agit d'un « pump coordonné » ne sont qu'une propagande cynique de plus de la part de personnes qui ne peuvent pas croire en quelque chose de bon et d'authentique », écrivait le fondateur du ZEC.

Les partisans de Zcash sur les réseaux sociaux affirment également que la majeure partie de l'étiquetage d'Arkham est basée sur des données provenant de la partie ouverte du réseau. La société elle-même assure avoir utilisé des méthodes permettant de corréler également une partie de l'activité du pool privé.

À 12h40 heure de Moscou, le Zcash s'échange autour de 410 dollars. Sur les dernières 24 heures, la monnaie a pris 4,5% de valeur, et sur un an, elle a augmenté de 543%.

Tether a investi dans des robots humanoïdes. Quand seront-ils lancés

Binance a suspendu un employé pour délit d'initié. Que s'est-il passé

Strategy a acheté le plus gros lot de bitcoins depuis juillet

İlgili Okumalar

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbit24 dk önce

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbit24 dk önce

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbit24 dk önce

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbit24 dk önce

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbit35 dk önce

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbit35 dk önce

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight News55 dk önce

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight News55 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片