Sorts out the Whole Process of the Outbreak of This Institutional Liquidity Crisis in One Article

Huobi2022-07-07 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-07-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The liquidity crisis does not seem to be resolved. Here we brief the process of the crisis.

Voyager Digital filed for bankruptcy protection on July 6, marking the second bankruptcy in the crypto industry. However, the liquidity crisis does not seem to be resolved. Here we brief the process of the crisis.

- Fuse : LUNA

On May 8, the pool of UST and the original LUNA were out of balance. In just two days, UST was completely de-anchored from $1. By May 12, LUNA almost hit to zero.

On May 12, Bitcoin fell below $30,000.

- Three Arrows Capital got involved in the LUNA slump

On May 13, Zhu Su, founder of Three Arrows Capital, said that he supported the LUNA community. Note that at this time, Zhu Su was still trying to save the situation and was still active on Twitter to rebuild confidence for investors. At the same time, stETH also started to de-anchor slightly.

On May 17th, Terra founder Do Kwon proposed a plan to revive the Terra. The proposal was passed on May 25th. The original LUNA was completely abandoned.

On May 26, 3AC began to make large ETH transfers on the FTX exchange.

On June 1 and June 2, Size and Laevitas announced that they had received financing led by 3AC, but just the amount is considerably small, at $6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. In retrospect, these two investments should have been made earlier. The announcement at the time was more of a means to stop the spread of investor’s pessimistic sentiment.

- BlockFi surfaced

On June 6, South Korean crypto-asset fintech company Delio announced that it has signed an asset supply contract worth $600 million with crypto lending platform BlockFi and Three Arrows Capital. 3AC and BlockFi should have obtained fiat cash flow from Delio by using crypto assets as collateral. This case may indicate that BlockFi also has liquidity problems.

On June 14, 3AC began to sell stETH in exchange for ETH.

On June 15, Zhu Su, founder of 3AC, posted that he was communicating to solve the liquidity problem. Note that this is the last time Zhu Su appeared on social media and has not been heard from since. On the same day, a source said that 3AC had liquidated $400 million on the lending platform. Since then, there have been reports that 3AC’s ETH has been liquidated.

On the same day, a source said that 3AC liquidated USD 400 million on the lending platform, and the rumors of 3AC’s ETH being liquidated has been heard endlessly since then.

On June 17, Kyle Davies, co-founder of 3AC, said that the collapse of Terra caught us off guard, and it was clear that Terra was the root of all evil.

- Alameda Research and Genesis appear linked to 3AC

On June 18, Genesis reported it had liquidated position of a "large counterparty", which probably referred to 3AC. There are multiple DeFi protocols that say the whereabouts of their funds deposited on the 3AC platform are unknown. Rumors abounded in the market. An anonymous source exposured that 3AC's outstanding debts may hit to US$2 billion, and said they frequently misappropriated client funds.

On the same day, Voyager Digital signed terms with Alameda Research for a loan of $200 million and 15,000 bitcoins.

On June 19, Bitcoin fell below $20,000 while Ethereum fell below $1,000.

On June 21, FTX stepped in to assist BlockFi, helping the latter with a $250 million revolving credit line. SBF, founder of FTX, also stressed that he would prevent the spread of the crisis.

- Voyager Digital announces its debt connection with 3AC

On June 22, Voyager Digital stated that 3AC owed a total of 15,250 BTC and 350 million USDT debt, with a total value of nearly 700 million US dollars. Such a large amount doomed Voyager to go bankrupt.

On June 29, a court in the British Virgin Islands ordered the liquidation of Singapore-based 3AC.

On July 1, Blockchain.com applied to liquidate all of 3AC’s assets. The next day, 3AC sought bankruptcy protection from the New York court, and 3AC has officially entered the bankruptcy stage since then.

On July 2, cryptocurrency broker Voyager Digital announced a suspension of trading and deposits and withdrawals. Its stock price then fell sharply.

On July 6, Voyager Digital became the second institution to go bankrupt. At the same time, the Toronto Stock Exchange launched a delisting review of Voyager Digital. Note that Voyager Digital and Alameda Research also have large financial transactions.

·

In addition to 3AC and Voyager, which have filed for bankruptcy, companies such as BlockFi, Alameda Research, and Genesis have also been affected. At present, BlockFi has received financial support from FTX, Alameda Research is a subsidiary of FTX, and Genesis has received DCG’s support, and it seems that the crisis has been alleviated. Will other companies fail in the next few weeks? Who will be next?

Welcome to leave your comments below:

İlgili Okumalar

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit4 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit4 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手4 saat önce

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手4 saat önce

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit7 saat önce

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit7 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片