Canada Speeds Up Stablecoin Rules Amid US Surging Ahead

TheCryptoTimes2025-09-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-10-27 tarihinde güncellendi

The Canadian government is actively working on rules for stablecoins and may reveal a major update in the federal budget on November 4, to be presented by Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne.

According to Bloomberg, government officials have been holding meetings with regulators and industry groups over the last couple of weeks. Canada still doesn’t have a national rulebook for them, which leaves companies unsure whether they’ll be treated like everyday payment tools or as regulated financial products.

Securities regulators have hinted they might classify them as securities or derivatives, which has left developers and payment firms in a difficult spot. Many of them say stablecoins are used for simple transfers and transactions, not speculation, and the lack of clarity makes it harder to build services around them.

USA’s progress puts pressure on Canada

The United States has already moved ahead with its own rules through the Genius Act. That law gives US regulators direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, including how they manage reserves and follow anti-money-laundering requirements. The clarity has helped strengthen the US as a base for stablecoin businesses.

Some industry voices say Canada needs to move faster or risk losing business to the US. They warn that if the rules remain unclear, investors and capital will migrate to jurisdictions with better-defined policy, reducing activity in Canada’s own financial market.

Analyst concerns

Venture investor John Ruffolo argues that this shift would quietly send Canadian savings into US assets like Treasury bills, since those stablecoins are backed by American government debt. If this happens at scale, it could reduce demand for Canadian bonds and weaken the Bank of Canada’s control over the money supply.

Canadian officials are aware of the risks. Ron Morrow, Executive Director of Payments, Supervision and Oversight at Bank of Canada, has said Canada should seriously consider a federal stablecoin framework similar to other countries. Bank of Canada’s former Deputy Governor Carolyn Wilkins has also pushed for action, saying Canada needs rules that protect trust and competition in digital payments.

However, creating a national framework will be complicated. Canada must coordinate between the federal government, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), and 13 different provincial and territorial securities regulators. This has slowed decision-making compared with the United States.

Also Read: JPC Inc. Launches Japan’s First Yen-Backed Stablecoin


Mobile Only Image

İlgili Okumalar

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit16 dk önce

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit16 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit19 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit19 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit40 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit40 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片