Major Crypto Wallets Unite to Battle $400M Phishing Threat

TheCryptoTimes2025-10-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-10-22 tarihinde güncellendi

MetaMask, Phantom, WalletConnect, and Backpack have teamed up with the Security Alliance (SEAL) to launch a global phishing defense network after crypto scammers stole more than $400 million in the first half of 2025, according to blockchain security firm CertiK.

“We’ve joined forces to launch a global phishing defense network that can protect more users across the entire ecosystem,” said the MetaMask team in a tweet on X. SEAL said this is an effort to build a “decentralized immune system for crypto security,” which would allow anyone worldwide to help stop the next major phishing attack before it spreads.

The network connects several top wallets through SEAL’s “verifiable phishing reports” system, announced last week. This system allows security researchers to confirm that malicious sites truly host phishing content, giving wallet providers reliable evidence before issuing warnings. With this setup, user-submitted phishing reports are automatically verified and shared across all participating wallets, triggering real-time alerts without the need for central approval.

“Anyone with a valid report is able to trigger a phishing warning across network participants in real time and without any special permissions,” SEAL stated. The alliance says this approach will speed up response times and save more users from losing funds to online scams. “We want to bring this data to as many wallets as possible,” SEAL added.

The campaign targets crypto “drainers,” phishing operators who have upgraded their tactics to dodge detection. According to SEAL, these scammers now rotate landing pages quickly when blocklists update, move their hosting offshore, and use cloaking tools to hide from automated scanners. 

“Drainers are a constant cat and mouse game,” said Ohm Shah, a security researcher at MetaMask. He noted that working with SEAL helps wallet teams apply research faster, “effectively throwing a wrench at the drainer’s infra.”

Phishing attacks remain the top cause of crypto losses this year, accounting for the largest number of security incidents globally, according to CertiK reports in July . With wallet providers uniting under SEAL, the crypto industry is aiming to make phishing a harder game for scammers to win.

Also Read: Polymarket Launches Mini App In Its World App


Mobile Only Image

İlgili Okumalar

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

The Agentic OS: Beyond AI, It's About the Foundational Stack In 2026, major operating systems like Android, iOS, HarmonyOS, and Windows are entering the "Agentic" era, integrating proactive AI assistants deeply into the system layer. However, the real competition lies not in the flashy AI features showcased at events, but in the three-layer foundational stack that enables them: the system-level AI Runtime, proprietary/controllable chips, and the on-device/cloud model matrix. The AI Runtime acts as the central scheduler, managing model inference, resource allocation, and exposing capabilities to apps. Controllable chips (e.g., Apple Silicon, Google Tensor, Huawei Kirin) are crucial for deep hardware-software co-optimization, determining the efficiency and experience limits of on-device Agents. The on-device/cloud model matrix provides the "intelligence," with proprietary, chip-optimized small models (like Gemini Nano, Apple's ~3B model) handling daily tasks locally for low latency, privacy, and reliability, while cloud models tackle complex requests. Deep synergy between these three layers enables key Agent differentiators: ultra-low latency and power efficiency, genuine "on-device first" privacy, access to system-level personal context across apps, and reliable performance as a system service even offline. OS vendors with strong integration across this stack (like Apple, Google, and Huawei) build a deeper moat. Beyond this core stack, long-term competitiveness depends on variables like structured App integration (e.g., App Intents/AppFunctions) for reliable multi-step workflows, and robust privacy frameworks that build user trust. This shift towards Agentic OS extends beyond phones and PCs to IoT, cars, and XR glasses via existing multi-device ecosystems. The race is won not in a keynote, but through generations of meticulously co-developed chips, models, and system software.

marsbit1 saat önce

Agentized OS: It's Not About AI, It's About the Foundation

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's recent statement that "intelligence will become a utility like electricity or water" has sparked significant controversy, primarily around copyright issues and the nature of AI development. While positioning AI as a utility serves as a compelling narrative for infrastructure investors, critics argue the analogy is flawed in three key areas. First, there's a fundamental "property gap." Traditional utilities like water and power create new, physical infrastructure from scratch. In contrast, major AI models are trained by reorganizing vast amounts of existing human-created content—books, articles, code, etc.—often scraped from the web without explicit permission or compensation to creators. This "free acquisition, paid resale" model is seen by many as ethically problematic. Second, there's a "pricing gap." True public utilities are typically regulated to ensure universal service with non-discriminatory, cost-plus pricing. AI's token-based pricing, however, involves significant price discrimination (e.g., output tokens costing much more than input tokens) and is designed for revenue maximization, not equitable access. Third, a "governance gap" exists. Utilities operate under public oversight, while AI pricing and development are currently controlled by a few private companies. Furthermore, the industry's own shift toward buying licensed training data (e.g., deals with Reddit or news publishers) undermines its previous legal reliance on "fair use" for freely scraped data. In conclusion, while AI is indeed becoming a foundational technology, calling it a public utility remains contentious. The title requires not just scale and a pay-per-use model, but also credible solutions for data provenance, equitable pricing, and public governance.

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Sam Altman's 'Water and Electricity Theory' Sparks Copyright Controversy

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片