Here’s how crypto funds defied a $20B crash with billions in new inflows

ambcrypto2025-10-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-10-14 tarihinde güncellendi

Key takeaways

Did crypto funds see inflows despite the market crash?

Crypto funds attracted $3.17 billion in inflows, even as nearly $20 billion in liquidations rocked the market.

Are altcoin and Ether funds showing weakness?

Yes, both Ether and altcoin funds saw big outflows midweek.


Crypto investment products shrugged off last week’s brutal market crash, drawing billions in new capital despite widespread panic selling. Investors poured $3.17 billion into crypto funds – A sign of confidence even during bouts of sharp volatility and nearly $20 billion in liquidations.

Crypto funds defy the odds

A recent CoinShares report revealed that while total assets under management (AUM) dipped to $242 billion during Friday’s flash crash, inflows remained strong across major crypto funds.

bitcoin crypto

Source: CoinShares

“Friday saw little reaction with a paltry $159 million outflows,” CoinShares’ Head of Research James Butterfill noted, proving the sector’s resilience despite billions being liquidated.

Nic Puckrin, crypto analyst and co-founder of The Coin Bureau, also claimed that while inflows are encouraging, the crash was a wake-up call for overconfident traders. He told AMBCrypto,

“The bloodbath we saw in markets over the weekend is a brutal reminder that, as the crypto market grows and matures, the risks are amplified.”

He went on to add,

“The arrival of spot crypto ETFs and institutional interest has lulled investors into a false sense of security, but it remains the only market that trades after hours.”

Bitcoin [BTC] led inflows with figures of $2.7 billion over the week, bringing YTD inflows to $30.2 billion – Still about 30% below last year’s total of $41.7 billion. The surge in participation also pushed weekly trading volumes to a record $53 billion, including $15.3 billion on Friday alone.

Ether funds see pullback, despite weekly gains

Ether [ETH] investment products recorded $338 million in net inflows over the week.

However, they also faced the largest single-day outflow of $174.83 million on 10 October.

ethereum

Source: SoSoValue

The sell-off dragged cumulative net inflows to $14.91 billion and came during the volatility of Friday’s flash crash. According to Butterfill, investors likely saw Ether funds as the “most vulnerable” during the downturn.

Puckrin noted,

“Ironically, now that the dust has settled, many blue-chip tokens have seen a strong rebound — including Ethereum, which is looking particularly strong back above $4,000. As such, many spot investors find themselves in a similar position to where they were before the flash crash.”

Despite the pullback, trading activity remained elevated though, with $4.77 billion in daily volumes. This hinted at sustained market engagement, even as sentiment briefly turned risk-off.

Altcoins slow down

Altcoin-focused funds lost momentum last week, despite ongoing enthusiasm for upcoming U.S ETF launches. Solana [SOL] products drew $93.3 million, while XRP funds added $61.6 million – Both seeing steep declines from the previous week’s surges of $706.5 million and $219 million.

The slowdown could be attributed to investor caution in the face of the liquidation event. Puckrin said,

“The biggest shock over the weekend was that traders were forced out of even profitable positions due to auto-deleveraging (ADL) on exchanges – a risk management mechanism that most will have not even heard about. It’s a blunt instrument that certainly deserves some scrutiny as exchanges conduct reviews of this mass liquidation event.”

That’s not all though. Especially since the ongoing U.S government shutdown has left at least 16 crypto ETF applications awaiting approval.

crypto

Source: X

According to ETF analyst Nate Geraci, once the shutdown ends, the market could witness a “flood” of new spot crypto ETFs – Potentially a catalyst for inflows.

Share

İlgili Okumalar

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

marsbit54 dk önce

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbit54 dk önce

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手1 saat önce

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手1 saat önce

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbit1 saat önce

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbit1 saat önce

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

This article deconstructs the "bottleneck point" investment methodology of the renowned investor known as "Serenity" (aleabitoreddit). Characterized by a YTD return of over 4500%, the strategy involves identifying a major, confirmed trend (e.g., AI data center expansion), mapping its supply chain, and then pinpointing a critical, hard-to-replace upstream bottleneck that the market has yet to fully price in. The core framework is a five-factor model: 1) **Certain Demand** from a clear megatrend; 2) **Constrained Supply** with high barriers to entry and slow replication; 3) **Low Market Attention**, where the company is overlooked; 4) **Value Capture** potential through pricing power and market share; and 5) a near-term **Catalyst** to trigger re-evaluation. Case studies include **$AXTI** (InP substrates for photonics), **$RPI** (edge hardware for AI agents), and companies like **$AAOI** and **$LITE** tied to hyperscaler-specific ASIC demand (e.g., Microsoft Maia, Amazon Trainium). The article provides a six-step guide for applying this approach: 1) Identify a validated macro trend; 2) Map the entire supply chain; 3) Find the true bottleneck; 4) Gather concrete evidence (e.g., filings, customer contracts); 5) Perform rigorous risk assessment ("anti-thesis"); 6) Match position size to depth of research. Key limitations are also noted: the risk of narrative overfitting, difficulty in valuing early-stage companies, Serenity's own market-moving influence creating reflexivity, and potential survivorship bias due to the AI bull market. The essence of the method is not to copy picks but to adopt the research process: find the trend, locate the bottleneck, verify with evidence, assess valuation, await a catalyst, and then invest with discipline. The philosophy is summarized as "walking through the narrow gate"—seeking non-consensus, structurally vital points within booming industries before they become widely recognized.

链捕手1 saat önce

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片