Запрет майнинга криптовалют привел к снижению энергопотребления в Сибири

cryptonews.ru2025-04-07 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-10-08 tarihinde güncellendi

За первые девять месяцев 2025 года энергопотребление в юго-восточной Сибири сократилось на 9,2%, что во многом связано с запретом на майнинг, заявил председатель правления АО «Системный оператор ЕЭС» Федор Опадчий.

Выступая на Всероссийской тарифной конференции в Сочи, Федор Опадчий сообщил, что запрет на майнинг цифровых активов в юго-восточной Сибири позволил выделить более 320 МВт свободных мощностей. При этом для Иркутской области ограничения на майнинг помогут в перспективе высвободить для нужд региона еще около 600 МВт электроэнергии, добавил чиновник.

«Если правительству удастся сохранить меры сдерживания майнинга, то появится возможность рассмотреть в этом энергорайоне строительство не 1200-1300 МВт мощностей дополнительной новой генерации, а меньшего объема», — отметил председатель правления.

По данным компании, в целом энергопотребление в Единой энергосистеме (ЕЭС) России по состоянию на начало октября 2025 года снизилось на 0,8% по сравнению с аналогичным периодом прошлого года.

Ранее правительство России утвердило список регионов, где майнинг запрещен с 1 января 2025 года по 15 марта 2031 года. В перечень вошли Дагестан, Ингушетия, Кабардино-Балкария, Карачаево-Черкесия, Северная Осетия, Чечня, ДНР, ЛНР, Запорожская и Херсонская области. Кроме того, с 7 апреля 2025 года майнинг полностью запрещен на юге Иркутской области, а в некоторых районах Бурятии и Забайкальского края — в периоды пикового энергопотребления.

Министр энергетики Сергей Цивилев заявил на Восточном экономическом форуме, что запреты на добычу цифровых активов, начавшиеся в ряде российских регионов, положительно сказались на состоянии национальной энергосистемы.

İlgili Okumalar

Catholic And Law Enforcement Groups Warn CLARITY Act Could Weaken Crypto Crime Safeguards

A coalition of Catholic leaders, law enforcement groups, and anti-trafficking advocates warns that the CLARITY Act could weaken safeguards against crypto-enabled crime. Their criticism focuses on provisions that would protect developers of non-custodial software (like wallets and DeFi protocols) from being regulated as money transmitters. This highlights a core regulatory dilemma: distinguishing neutral software from financial intermediation. Crypto advocates argue such developers should not be treated like exchanges, while critics fear broad exemptions could hinder the tracking of illicit finance, including human trafficking and sanctions evasion. The bill aims to create clearer market-structure rules, but this opposition shows the debate extends beyond investor protection to law enforcement concerns. The pushback means supporters may need to address these issues, potentially leading to amendments or stricter requirements. For the crypto industry, clearer rules could spur U.S. investment, but the bill faces a tougher political path if framed as weakening crime-fighting tools.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Catholic And Law Enforcement Groups Warn CLARITY Act Could Weaken Crypto Crime Safeguards

bitcoinist2 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit6 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit6 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

TheNewsCrypto6 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCrypto6 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片