Pi Network sheds $18B in six months: ‘That’s basically a rug pull’

ambcrypto2025-10-06 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-10-07 tarihinde güncellendi

Key Takeaways

Why is Pi Network facing rug pull claims again?

It has plunged over 90%, erasing nearly $18 billion in market cap and fueling investor distrust.

What’s next for PI?

Without resolving community concerns and supply growth issues, the token could stay under pressure in the coming months.


Pi Network [PI] price has crashed over 90% since it debuted in March, renewing “rug pull” allegations. 

In March, the price shot up to $2.79 and reached about $18 billion in market cap amid FOMO after its debut. But it has slipped below $1 and dropped further to $0.26, shedding over $16 billion in market cap over the past six months. 

PI network

Source: CoinMarketCap

According to a pseudonymous crypto market commentator, Mr Spock, the 90% crash meant the project was a “rug pull.”

“Pi crashed over 90% from its highest position, that’s basically a rug pull.”

Hype and speculative interest fade

Back in May, PI faced a similar rug pull claim after the team allegedly created a $100 million venture fund amid unmet expectations and broken promises for over six years. 

The community felt that the $100 million fund, partly gained from internal revenue and mining, was diverted for external uses instead of the ecosystem. Unsurprisingly, the backlash capped the attempted rebound in May and dragged PI below $0.50. 

Despite the souring market sentiment on the altcoin, Pi Scan showed that some players were still accumulating it. 

In the past 24 hours, a Net Flow of $112.3 million was recorded, underscoring that more PI tokens flowed out of exchanges than into them, suggesting a buying spree. 

Pi Network price

Source: Pi Scan

Derivatives data show speculative interest has collapsed

Even so, the speculative interest suggested otherwise. While there has been an improvement in Futures market demand, the overall speculative interest dropped by over 10X. 

Glassnode data showed that PI’s Open Interest (OI), or the number of opened contracts in the derivatives market, declined from nearly $120 million to about $20 million. 

Pi Network

Source: Glassnode

In other words, the altcoin has been under multi-month bearish pressure as the community felt sidelined by the team

The inflationary pressure also tanked the price. Since May, the PI’s circulating supply has increased by over 1 billion tokens. 

PI network

Source: Glassnode

Collectively, the unhappy PI community and distrust of the project team have left the altcoin under bearish drift. As a result, PI’s muted price action may continue for a while unless the team addresses community concerns

Share

İlgili Okumalar

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit25 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit25 dk önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit54 dk önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit54 dk önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn57 dk önce

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn57 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片