Мошенничество через Discord-ссылки угрожает многочисленным криптопроектам

cryptonews.ru2025-09-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-23 tarihinde güncellendi

Аналитическая команда Scam Sniffer предупредила о новой волне атак в Web3-экосистеме. Скам-группы перехватывают истекшие Discord-приглашения и используют их для создания фишинговых ловушек. Так, ссылка, ранее принадлежавшая разработчикам Kiloex, оказалась под контролем мошенников. На нее до сих пор ведут страницы проекта на Coingecko и CoinMarketCap, а также старые твиты команды. Сегодня зафиксированы новые случаи кражи активов через фишинговые подписи.

Схема атаки выглядит системной и затрагивает не только Kiloex. По данным Scam Sniffer, аналогичным образом был скомпрометирован Discord-пригласительный линк проекта Verisense Network. Скам-группы активно захватывают освободившиеся «красивые» URL, после чего старые ссылки в документации, соцсетях и постах превращаются в инструменты фишинга. Это делает уязвимыми даже те проекты, которые давно не обновляли публичные ссылки.

Механизм атаки прост. Сначала официальное приглашение истекает. Далее мошенники «занимают» тот же самый vanity URL. В итоге все старые материалы с этой ссылкой автоматически начинают вести на поддельные серверы. Там пользователей заманивают фейковые боты для верификации, которые через мошеннические формы и подписи получают доступ к цифровым активам. Такая практика уже доказала свою эффективность для злоумышленников.

Эксперты подчеркивают, что угроза реальна и затрагивает множество проектов. Участникам рынка настоятельно рекомендуется оперативно проверять и обновлять все Discord-ссылки. Важно убедиться, что отметки в профилях CoinMarketCap, Coingecko, официальных сайтах и документации указывают на актуальные приглашения. Пользователям советуют всегда перепроверять адреса через легитимные источники и внимательно относиться к любым запросам на подпись транзакций.

İlgili Okumalar

Inside Bonzo Lend’s $9M exploit – Why secure smart contracts couldn’t stop it

Bonzo Lend, a lending protocol on the Hedera network, suffered a $9.05 million exploit due to a flaw in the external Supra oracle system. The attacker manipulated SAUCE token price feeds, enabling them to borrow assets far exceeding their collateral. Audits confirmed the protocol's own smart contracts and the Hedera core network were secure; the failure originated in the trusted oracle infrastructure. This incident highlights a recurring DeFi risk where correct protocol logic can still be weaponized via compromised external data. The attack impacted market sentiment, causing a drop in HBAR's price and Hedera's DeFi TVL, underscoring the need for stronger oracle safeguards and verification standards.

ambcrypto1 saat önce

Inside Bonzo Lend’s $9M exploit – Why secure smart contracts couldn’t stop it

ambcrypto1 saat önce

Ethereum vs. Bitcoin: Is ETH’s 5% Q3 rally the start of a structural rotation?

The article examines whether Ethereum's (ETH) recent 5% Q3 rally against Bitcoin (BTC) signals a lasting capital rotation or is merely another short-term move. Historically, ETH has struggled to sustain outperformance; a strong 2025 Q3 rally was largely reversed, suggesting temporary rotations as capital flowed back to Bitcoin. Currently, Bitcoin dominance is testing a key resistance level, hinting at a possible shift back toward BTC. However, on-chain and institutional data present a counter-narrative. Ethereum ETFs have attracted significant net inflows this month, outperforming Bitcoin ETFs. A key catalyst is Robinhood's new Layer 2 network, which uses ETH for gas and settlement. Data shows a nearly 10x weekly surge in ETH bridged to this chain, indicating growing ecosystem activity and ETH demand. While it's premature to confirm a structural shift, the rally appears increasingly supported by fundamentals—including institutional inflows, rising Layer 2 adoption, and stronger on-chain metrics—rather than just market rotation. If these trends persist, the current ETH/BTC breakout could signal the beginning of a broader capital move into Ethereum during Q3.

ambcrypto3 saat önce

Ethereum vs. Bitcoin: Is ETH’s 5% Q3 rally the start of a structural rotation?

ambcrypto3 saat önce

Apple Sues OpenAI Sparking Feud, Musk Slams Altman for Fraud, Altman Retorts with 'Space Data Center' Boast

Apple Sues OpenAI as Musk-Altman Feud Escalates The public feud between Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman intensified, coinciding with their respective AI companies launching flagship models in the same week, highlighting fierce competition. On July 11, Musk posted on X, accusing Altman of taking "fraud to the next level" regarding OpenAI's commercial practices. Altman fired back, sarcastically suggesting Musk was the one selling "short-term space datacenter" concepts to public market investors. Musk countered with allegations that Altman "stole an open-source AI charity" and, amid Apple's recent lawsuit, "stole all of Apple's phone tech." He mockingly referenced Altman needing a "parole officer's" approval to travel. This exchange occurred against the backdrop of a significant legal development: Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in a California federal court, alleging the AI company deliberately solicited Apple employees to leak confidential information on unreleased products to aid its own hardware plans. Apple demands OpenAI cease this activity, destroy proprietary materials, and redesign upcoming products. OpenAI responded, stating it has no interest in other companies' trade secrets and remains focused on innovation. This lawsuit could profoundly impact their two-year partnership where OpenAI provides key tech for Apple Intelligence and Siri. The rivalry extended to product releases. OpenAI launched GPT-5.6, while Musk's SpaceXAI unveiled Grok 4.5. Both are positioned as AI agents capable of multi-step tasks. GPT-5.6 is noted for strengths in broad reasoning, business workflows, and cybersecurity. Grok 4.5 is highlighted for higher efficiency in autonomous programming and developer workflows, with lower usage costs than GPT-5.6, though OpenAI's model reportedly still leads in areas like abstract reasoning. The differing strengths offer distinct choices for enterprises and developers based on their specific needs.

marsbit3 saat önce

Apple Sues OpenAI Sparking Feud, Musk Slams Altman for Fraud, Altman Retorts with 'Space Data Center' Boast

marsbit3 saat önce

Robinhood Chain's Success Proves Ethereum Is Not Dead

Robinhood Chain's success demonstrates that the L1+L2 model is the preferred infrastructure for real-world, cash-flow-focused businesses entering the crypto space. Historically, many crypto projects were built around token monetization. In contrast, companies like Robinhood and Coinbase (with Base) choose to build their businesses using Ethereum's established foundation. They leverage the decentralized security, liquidity, and neutrality of Ethereum L1 while creating custom, high-performance, and controlled environments on Ethereum L2s (like Arbitrum). This separation allows for business-specific customization without the massive overhead of launching and securing an independent L1. Their decision to use ETH for gas and to integrate deeply with Ethereum's ecosystem is a rational business choice aimed at minimizing risk and maximizing product viability, not ideological support. As more traditional entities build cash-generating services on-chain, this model will solidify Ethereum's position as the core settlement and security layer for the growing on-chain economy, benefiting ETH's network effects and monetary premium.

marsbit3 saat önce

Robinhood Chain's Success Proves Ethereum is Not Dead

Robinhood Chain's success demonstrates that Ethereum's L1+L2 model is thriving, not dying. Traditional crypto projects often focused on token sales and chose infrastructure to maximize token value. However, real-world businesses building cash-based products make different, pragmatic choices. When launching its chain, Robinhood chose Ethereum as its base layer and built a custom L2 using Arbitrum technology. It uses Ethereum blobs for data availability, ETH for gas, and relies on Ethereum for security. This mirrors Coinbase's earlier decision to build Base as an Ethereum L2. These are not ideological choices but sound business decisions driven by needs for security, liquidity, control, and predictable economics. The shift in the industry is from "token-centric" models to "cash business" models. Real companies serving broad user bases prioritize risk reduction, product improvement, and profit. For them, blockchain is infrastructure. The Ethereum L1+L2 "barbell" structure is ideal: the highly decentralized, neutral, and liquid L1 for settlement and security, combined with customizable, high-performance L2s for execution. This trend is positive for Ethereum and ETH. As more real businesses build on it, ETH becomes more integrated, distributed, and useful, strengthening its network effects and monetary premium. Robinhood's path—starting on an existing L2 and graduating to a dedicated one—is likely to become a standard playbook, proving the enduring utility of Ethereum's layered architecture for serious commercial adoption.

Odaily星球日报3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot