Ripple’s New DeFi Roadmap Renews Toolkit on XRPL

TheCryptoTimes2025-09-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-22 tarihinde güncellendi

Ripple detailed a development roadmap for the XRP Ledger (XRPL) on September 22, 2025, introducing a suite of tools aimed at institutional finance. The announcement reveals XPRL as a competitor to other enterprise-focused blockchains in the intensifying race to tokenize real-world assets (RWAs) and attract regulated financial firms. 

The upgrades, set to roll out with the upcoming XRPL Version 3.0.0 pending validator approval, focus on compliant on-chain credit, advanced  RWA tokenization, and privacy.

New Toolkit for Institutional Finance

According to a company blog post, the roadmap’s centerpiece is a native lending protocol designed to create on-chain credit markets. This protocol, outlined in the XLS-66 specification, will allow for pooled lending and underwritten credit directly at the ledger level.

The plan also introduces the Multi-Purpose Token (MPT), a new standard intended to represent complex financial instruments like bonds. In terms of compliance, Ripple mentioned recently implemented tools, including Credentials for decentralized identity verification and Deep Freeze, which allows token issuers to freeze assets in flagged accounts.

Looking further ahead, the company announced plans to integrate Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), a technology that enables confidential transactions. According to the roadmap, the first application will be confidential MPTs, which are targeted for the first quarter of 2026.

Overview of XRPL’s Position

These new tools place the XRP Ledger in more direct competition with established institutional platforms. The native lending protocol enters a market with solutions like Aave on Polygon and Trader Joe on Avalanche. Although, Ripple focused on these new finance and security features for this report, since all major enterprise blockchains are working to develop robust confidentiality solutions.

Similarly, Ripple’s move intensifies the competition for the multi-trillion dollar RWA tokenization market. The success of its protocol-native approach versus the more flexible, application-heavy ecosystems of Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatible chains remains to be seen. 

Ripple’s new roadmap shows a strategy to get more penetration in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) market, especially RWA. The success of this strategy will depend on the actual adoption of these new tools by financial institutions and how effectively XRPL can draw liquidity away from its competitors.

Also read: Sei Development Foundation Onboards Jamie Finn to Drive RWA Growth


Mobile Only Image

İlgili Okumalar

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit2 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit2 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片