Hyperliquid breaks $59, then dips 4% – Can HYPE rebound?

ambcrypto2025-09-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-19 tarihinde güncellendi

Key Takeaways

Why are institutions accumulating HYPE?

Institutions, specifically DATs, have acquired about 6% of the total circulating supply of HYPE.

What is influencing current price action?

The current bullish price action could be attributed to institutional inflow, DEX trading volume, and TVL.


Hyperliquid [HYPE] made yet another peak at $59.38, becoming one of the highest gainers in crypto. However, the altcoin was trading at $56, dipping 4.31%, at press time.

The Hyperliquid project has achieved several major milestones, particularly in securing institutional backing and advancing its ecosystem development.

While only a few institutions have established Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) for the altcoin so far, the ones that have are noteworthy and impactful.

The DATs bubble

At the time of writing, data from DefiLlama indicated that Hyperliquid Treasury Holdings accounted for 6.811% of the total circulating supply, amounting to approximately 18.43 million HYPE tokens. 

Only 27% of the total supply had been unlocked, while 730 million HYPE remained locked, suggesting that the portion held by treasuries was still relatively modest.

This treasury-held amount was valued at $1.071 billion, based on a circulating market cap of $15.20 billion. Meanwhile, Token Terminal data showed that HYPE’s fully diluted market cap was on the rise, reaching $58.5 billion.

Among the major holders, Hyperliquid Strategies, formerly known as Sonnet BioTherapeutics Holdings, Inc., held 6.24% of the supply, while Hyperion DeFi, Inc. held 0.57%. 

Additionally, CoinGecko data revealed that Lion Group Holdings maintained a treasury balance of approximately 128,929 HYPE tokens.

hypehype

Source: DefiLlama

The two main treasuries had returns of more than 5 times and have accumulated their holdings on average prices between $7.23 and $11.99.

In addition to the capital inflow from institutions, Hyperliquid was also performing well on its DEX trading platform.

Perpetual Futures, Spot Volume and TVL

The Hyperliquid DEX platform was emerging as a serious competitor to the already established exchanges with its impressive trading volumes.

The Perpetual Futures trading volume was at $328 billion in the last 30 days. Its DEX volume surged by 47%, reaching $8.91 billion in a week, while 24 hours trading volume was $1.125 billion.

By comparison, Perps volume (roughly $14 billion) was about 20 times that of Spot’s (about $700 million). Leverage from Perps trading drove the performance of the Hyperliquid platform.

hypehype

Source: Blockworks

Additionally, protocols on the Hyperliquid chain were increasing in Total Value Locked (TVL), let alone the whole ecosystem. The TVL was at $9.25 billion, with Hyperlend accounting for $631 million.

HYPE hits record highs

On the charts, the price of HYPE made another new ATH for the second consecutive day. The Bollinger Bands had opened up, indicating volatility in the token trading.

Technically, price had broken above a rising wedge pattern that had consolidated for about a month. Levels above $60 appeared to be the next areas of interest for the altcoin holders.

hypehype

Source: TradingView

In conclusion, as institutions continued to acquire more tokens, Hyperliquid gained greater visibility and exposure within the mainstream financial landscape.

Share

İlgili Okumalar

Hardware Wallet Owners Lose Money: The Nuances of Cold Bitcoin Storage in 2026

The article discusses a wave of distrust towards hardware wallets by the summer of 2026, primarily triggered by security incidents. The most significant involved Coldcard wallets from Coinkite, where a firmware bug dating back to 2021 drastically reduced the cryptographic entropy for seed phrase generation. This allowed attackers to brute-force private keys, leading to losses estimated between $115-$153 million in Bitcoin. While Coldcard issued a fixed firmware, the incident damaged the reputation of all hardware wallets. Other manufacturers like Trezor and Ledger issued statements assuring their devices' security, citing their use of secure hardware elements for true random number generation. However, separate data breaches affected SafePal (exposing personal data of ~40,000 users) and Trezor (via a logistics partner, compromising data for ~14,000 users), though no private keys or crypto assets were stolen in these cases. The article clarifies that hardware wallets themselves don't "hold" crypto but store the keys to access it on the blockchain. It argues against abandoning hardware wallets entirely, pointing out that alternatives like paper, memory, or custodial exchange storage have their own significant risks. It concludes that these incidents should be viewed as specific failures, not a condemnation of the entire category. A key underlying challenge highlighted is the dual role of advancing AI, which empowers both defenders to enhance security and attackers to find vulnerabilities more efficiently.

cryptonews.ru18 dk önce

Hardware Wallet Owners Lose Money: The Nuances of Cold Bitcoin Storage in 2026

cryptonews.ru18 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片