为什么说Multicoin、Jump与Galaxy新攒的DAT局被低估?

marsbit2025-09-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-13 tarihinde güncellendi

什么说 @multicoincap + @jump_ + @galaxyhq 新攒的 DAT 局,可能被市场低估了?谈谈个人看法:

1)Forward Industries, Inc. ( $FORD ) 是一家在 Nasdaq 上市的老牌公司,但市值不大,目前也就不到 6,000 万市值,流通股 171 万,通过 PIPE 私募股权融资方式注入新运营业务后,原先的运营实体包袱不大,所以作为壳后续的牵制影响较小;

2) @KyleSamani 好比 $BTC 的 @saylor 和 $ETH 的 @fundstrat,一直是 $SOL 非常执着的技术和叙事布道者,本次 DAT 局,其个人额外投资 2,500 万美元,明显是要玩波大的。

3)Multicoin、Jump、Galaxy 三大机构都和 Solana 渊源颇深,Multicoin 累积投资超 5 亿美到生态内;Jump 作为华尔街高频机构一致躬身入局,做 Firedancer 节点、探索 DFBA(双流批次竞拍)机制,给生态提供 Market Maker 服务等;Galaxy 则累积持有超 10 亿美金 SOL,也在 Solana 上代币化了自己的股票 $GLXY ,其在全球 VC 网络和机构资源上的优势非常抢眼。

叙事布道 + 技术创新 + 资源触达,如此高度互补的铁三角,实力不容小觑;

4)Solana 即将到来的 Alpenglow 共识、Firedancer 客户端节点多样性等会大幅提升其自身性能。TPS 之前有过 10w+ 的主网测试,执行速度也能降低到 150 毫秒以内,DFBA 创新机制没准会让 Solana 链上诞生杀手级新产品。关键是有个技术细节很多人没注意,最近一次 SIMD-228 治理提案被否决了,若一旦通过,将降低 SOL 的质押通胀收益率,会大幅影响 DAT 故事对机构的吸引力。

技术性能、创新基因、收益率,你看,一切似乎准备就绪的样子,只为卷起这场属于 Solana 的 DAT 接力棒;

5) @solana 的 DAT 叙事并不只是 BTC、以太坊以及其他 Altcoin 的「微策略」模式照搬。其他 DAT 只聚焦在代币本身,但 Solana 的 DAT 财库会辐射整个生态,最终就是要撕掉纯 MEME 链的定位,转型成一个 Internet Capital Markets(ICM)新叙事。这和由美国加密友好政府推动的 TradFi 融合大趋势正好接轨。

况且 ICM 的叙事对 Solana 而言足够宏大,可以把 MEME 发射台、DePIN、PayFi、HFT Trading 等一众叙事都囊括进来。

İlgili Okumalar

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手7 saat önce

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手7 saat önce

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手7 saat önce

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手7 saat önce

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit7 saat önce

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit7 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片