USDH投票进行时:“内定剧本”、“霸总追爱”、“激流勇退”轮番上演

Odaily星球日报2025-09-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-12 tarihinde güncellendi

原创|Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|Wenser(@wenser 2010

Hyperliquid 原生稳定币 USDH 发行竞标进行得如火如荼,但加密市场及 Hyperliquid 社区对这场“竞标赛”的讨论已经进入“Next Level”了,Dragonfly 合伙人称其为“一场内定闹剧”;Hypurrscan 团队成员明示 Jan Van Eck 自己拥有 15%投票权想听对方“喵一声”解释对应信息;Ethena 则在给出种种优待条件后突然宣布退出竞标。事情发展到现在,“USDH 竞标案”的火热程度以及讨论度或许也远超 Hyperliquid 官方及社区成员的想象。

尽管尚未到 9 月 14 日的投票截止时间,但目前的戏码已然包括“内定剧本”、“霸总追爱”以及“激流勇退”等颇为戏剧化的情节,Odaily 星球日报将于本文对近期 USDH 相关剧情予以整理,供读者参考。

前情提要见 《Hyperliquid 稳定币 USDH 成“行业香饽饽”,巨头打响分发权乱战》

USDH 投票进行时:Native Markets 获超 70%验证者投票,Paxos Labs 屈居第二

根据 USDHTracker 网站 信息,截止 9 月 12 日下午 3 时,USDH 竞标中的各大发行商得票比例为:

  • Native Markets:70.42%;
  • Paxos Labs:16.67%;
  • Ethena:8.21%;
  • 未分配票数:4.71%。

Agora、Frax Finance、OpenEden、Sky 等发行商得票比例均为 0。

USDH 验证者投票界面信息

结合此前社区讨论中提到的 Native Markets 在 Hyperliquid 官方发布公告后 1 小时即提交竞标提案等信息来看,也无怪乎 Dragonfly 管理合伙人 Haseeb 此前 发文表示,“开始感觉 USDH RFP 有点像一场闹剧。从多个竞标者那里听说,除了 Native Markets 之外,没有任何验证者对考虑其他发行商感兴趣。这甚至不是一场严肃的讨论,就好像已经达成了幕后交易。Native Markets 的提案在 USDH RFP 宣布后几乎立即出现,暗示他们事先得到了通知。其他人整个周末都在匆忙地拼凑东西。所以整个 USDH RFP 基本上是为 Native Markets 量身定做的。

与此同时,社区似乎达成共识,最好的提案来自像 Ethena、Paxos、Agora 等老牌玩家,而不是 Native Markets 这样一个全新的初创公司。Polymarket 讲述的是同样的故事——Ethena 提案一公布,赔率立刻飙升,成为最有可能获胜的选项,直到人们意识到验证者对此不感兴趣。2 小时内,赔率暴跌。”随后,其在评论区补充道:“现在已从超过一半的 USDH 竞标者那里听到,他们同意这一点,并表示他们不会公开说出来,因为他们认为这样做没有意义,只会被批评。”此外,另一位竞标者对其表示:“出于明显的原因,我不想公开说这个,但把我算在‘我确信这是为 Native Markets 准备的,并且他们想进行程序性的治理投票,但却低估了它会面临如此疯狂的激烈竞争’这一类人里。”

当然,针对 Haseeb 的言论,与 Hypurr Collective 共同运营着最大的 HL 验证器的 Nansen CEO Alex Svanevik 站出来予以反击称:“这绝对是事实错误。我们的团队投入了大量精力审查提案并与竞标者沟通以寻找 HL 的最佳替代方案。这周我一直收到 USDH 竞标者的私信和电话,一直都是我们主动与他们接触的。我们甚至鼓励那些犹豫不决的玩家推进他们的提案,使整个过程更具竞争性。”

但事实来看,Nansen 还是选择了“用脚投票”——根据 USDH 投票信息 显示,目前 Nansen 与 Hypurr Collective 的 HYPE 质押量约为 2650 万枚,占质押份额高达 17.4%,是投票份额占比最高的验证者,而其支持的 USDH 发行商正是“Hyperliquid 社区原生项目”——Native Markets。而尽管 Nansen CEO 此前言之凿凿,但其投票份额 24 小时跌幅达 5.21%、12 小时跌幅为 3.58%。

部分 Hyperliquid 验证者 USDH 提案投票信息

USDH 提案插曲:千万富翁们的“ !Rank ”与“喵一声”时刻

值得一提的是,USDH 提案竞标过程中还发生了 2 件颇为有意思的事情,甚至颇有些令人啼笑皆非。

为表诚意,Agora、Paxos 团队成员忙于查询社区发言等级。

在 Hyperliquid 官方开辟出供各大发行商提交提案的 USDH 子频道后,老牌发行商 Paxos Labs 与 Agora 的团队成员为了确保自己顺利拥有发言权利,并从侧面表现出自己在社区发言的积极性,频繁查询了自己在 Discord 的发言等级及社区排名。

不得不说,USDH 竞标一事再次展现了“拍卖机制”的魅力,毕竟,这背后是一个规模超 56 亿美元、年度利润超 2 亿美元的现金流业务。

亿万资管巨头 Van Eck 掌舵人卖力示好,引验证者求“喵一声”解释。

除去发行商团队成员使劲浑身解数展现诚意以外,作为发行商 Agora 背后的资源方,资管巨头 VanEck 背后掌舵人、VanEck CEO Jan van Eck 也少见地在 X 平台发文表态,直接喊话 Hyperliquid 社区成员,对平台、生态及社区所获成绩不吝赞美。

随后,Hypurrscan 背后建设者 CL 发文直言:“我们有 15%的投票权(价值 13 亿美元),你能用简单的话解释下你想表达的意思吗?”

当然,最终 Hypurrscan 团队 Syavel 表示:“经过仔细考虑,Hypurrscan 将验证者投票投给了 Native Markets。在众多竞争者中,我们相信 Native Markets 是唯一真正以 Hyperliquid 为先导,并且与 Hyperliquid 最为一致的提案。”

但无论如何,正如有人 评论道“这实际上太疯狂了!一帮华尔街亿万富翁不得不像老鼠一样与一帮卡通人物打架,才能让他们的稳定币通过。”

“加密霸总示爱”:Paxos Labs、Ethena 拿出最大诚意,但后者最终激流勇退

现在看来,如果将 USDH 代号竞标视作一场各大稳定币发行商向 Hyperliquid 平台发起的“求爱仪式”,由 Max Fiege 领衔的 Native Markets 如同一个与 Hyperliquid 平台风雨同舟、一同走到现在的“青梅竹马”,而诸如 Paxos Labs、Ethena 等各大成熟的稳定币发行商则更像是慕名而来的“霸道总裁”。

Paxos:邀请PayPal、Venmo加入合作网络,拥有全球合法发行权

在 Paxos 提交的 USDH v 2 版本提案 中,作为老牌稳定币发行商,其选择发挥自己强大的“合作资源优势”与“全球布局优势”——

1. 与全球支付巨头 PayPal 合作 - HYPE 将在 PayPal/Venmo 上市,USDH 免费出入金,提供 2000 万美元生态系统激励措施,以及 Checkout、Braintree、Venmo、Hyperwallet 和 Xoom 的全渠道支付集成。值得一提的是,PayPal 与 Venmo 覆盖用户群体高达 4 亿人。

2. 重新设计的奖励机制 - 清晰的 AF-first(捐赠基金会优先)激励结构,Paxos Labs 仅在 TVL 里程碑达成时获得收益,上限为 5%,所有费用以 HYPE 代币形式收取,直接与社区利益一致。

3. 全球扩展计划 - Paxos Labs 将与 Paxos 合作,Paxos 是唯一一家合法发行全球稳定币的发行商,其他竞标者仅声称符合 GENIUS 标准,均无法在欧洲合法发行。其发行实体仅持有 MTL。Paxos 是当今世界上唯一一家能够确保 USDH 以完全合规的方式在全球范围内扩展的发行商。

Ethena:我本将心向明月,奈何明月照沟渠

相较于 Paxos,Ethena 则是继 Tether、Circle 之后被寄予厚望的“稳定币新星”。最新数据显示,其旗下两大稳定币 USDe、USDtb 发行量已 超 150 亿美元(USDe 发行规模超 132 亿枚,USDtb 发行规模超 18 亿枚)。

此前,Ethena 为了争夺 USDH 发行权也颇为用心,其提案 核心条款 包括:

  • USDH 初始将由 USDtb 100% 背书;
  • Ethena 承诺将 USDH 储备产生的至少 95% 的净收入用于 Hyperliquid 社区;
  • 若 Hyperliquid 社区希望将核心交易所当前以 USDC 计价的交易对重新计价至 USDH,Ethena 将承担所有 USDC 迁移至 USDH 的交易成本;
  • Ethena Labs 研究团队将向 Ethena 风险委员会提交提案,申请将 USDH 列为 USDe 的合规背书资产等。

换言之,Ethena 不仅将承担 Hyperliquid 网络 USDC 迁移成本,还将同样分润 95%收入反哺社区。类比一下的话,就像恋爱中的霸道总裁不仅给你分钱,还会负担你和前任分手的“分手费”。

但随着验证者投票结果的新鲜出炉,饶是 Ethena 这位身家颇丰的霸总也没办法再继续自我感动式地“求爱”了——9 月 11 日晚间,Ethena 创始人 Guy Young 发文表示:在与验证者及委托人沟通后,因社区对其非本地团队身份及与 Hyperliquid 生态契合度的担忧,Ethena 决定退出 USDH 稳定币发行竞赛。

当然,这并不意味着 Ethena 在 Hyperliquid 生态稳定币赛道的完全退出,其强调后续还将有一系列的计划,如与 Hyperliquid 生态本地团队开发新产品,包括:

-hUSDe 原生合成美元,

-USDe 启用了储蓄和卡消费产品,

-在 Hyperliquid 上实现了对冲流动,

-以及 Ethena 独特启用的 HIP-3 市场广泛设计空间:

a)带有奖励的交易抵押品,

b)模块化一级经纪业务,

c) 股票永续合约。

此外,其 提到“早已准备好其他对应稳定币代号”,后续计划推出新的稳定币。

值得一提的是,在这一退出 USDH 竞标的长文中,Guy Young 言词之间颇多玩味之词,明里暗里或表达了对 Native Markets 团队及 Hyperliquid 生态验证者的嘲讽。

至于谁是谁非、谁对谁错,谁又能在 Hyperliquid 生态稳定币大战中笑到最后,一切留待时间验证。

最后,根据此前 Hyperliquid 官方公告,各节点验证者在“验证者 USDH 投票声明”中表明的是其投票意向及理由。正式投票将于 9 月 14 日 18:00 UTC+8 开始,质押者需在此之前将质押委托给与自己投票意向一致的验证者。正式投票在 19:00 UTC+8 截止,当达到三分之二支持比例时,指定竞标方将能够在现货部署 gas 拍卖中竞标 USDH 代币符号。

İlgili Okumalar

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手3 saat önce

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手3 saat önce

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手3 saat önce

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手3 saat önce

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit3 saat önce

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片