非农年度数据大幅下修，特朗普政府火力全开，炮轰 BLS、拜登、鲍威尔

marsbit2025-09-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-10 tarihinde güncellendi

当地时间周二，在美国政府发布大幅下修的年度非农就业数据后，白宫迅速回应，抨击了美国总统特朗普的三大常见攻击目标：劳工统计局（BLS）、前美国总统拜登以及美联储主席鲍威尔。

白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特（Karoline Leavitt ）在一份声明中说：

今天，BLS 发布了史上最大幅度的下调修订，这证明了特朗普总统是对的：拜登的经济一塌糊涂，而 BLS 也已经失灵。

这正是我们需要新领导层的原因，以便恢复金融市场、企业、决策者和家庭对 BLS 数据的信任与信心，因为他们依赖这些数据做出重大决策。

就像 BLS 辜负了美国人民一样，太迟了的鲍威尔也一样，他已经没有任何借口，必须立即降息。美联储需要多次降息。9 月 9 日发布的 BLS 非农就业年度修正表明，美联储需要新的领导层。

美国劳工部的报告显示，在自 2024 年 3 月开始的一年中，美国经济创造的就业岗位少于最初报告的数字。根据劳工统计局的初步报告，非农就业数据的年度修订比最初估算减少了 91.1 万个。

美国财长贝森特表示，上周他曾警告 BLS 的就业数据将出现大幅下调。现在官方数据有了，2024 年就业增量被夸大了将近 100 万，这还是在已经报告了下修 57.7 万的基础之上，这使得拜登对就业增长的夸大达到了惊人的 150 万。

贝森特还指出，美国总统特朗普关于“美联储用高利率扼杀经济增长”的说法没错。真相是，特朗普总统接手的经济状况远比报告的糟糕。美联储应当重新校准利率。美联储必须重拾独立性，停止为富裕阶层服务。在美国，美联储是不平等问题最主要的推手之一。

美国副总统万斯表示，有必要借机重塑对 BLS 的信心。BLS 的数据已经变得“毫无用处”。

美国劳工部长 Chavez-Deremer 表示，数据修正为质疑劳工统计局数据提供了更多理由，承诺将在 BLS 令数据统计方式现代化，在前总统拜登任期内，BLS 不曾改善数据的引用方式。

攻击目标：BLS、美联储

有媒体分析指出，BLS 已成为白宫精心策划的一场削弱公众对其数据信任运动的攻击目标。

8 月，BLS 公布 7 月非农就业数据初值，其中包括对今年早些时候两个月就业增长的下调修订。几个小时后，特朗普便突然解雇了劳工统计局局长 Erika McEntarfer。

特朗普辩称，这些修订尽管在就业报告中属于常见现象，但仍表明 BLS 在出于政治目的操纵就业数据。他解雇 McEntarfer 的举动引来了经济学家和部分议员的强烈批评。

鲍威尔在 2017 年由特朗普提名出任美联储主席。但自特朗普第二任期开始以来，鲍威尔就频繁成为白宫的攻击目标，因为特朗普对他拒绝降息的态度越来越感到不满。不过，鲍威尔在 8 月表示，美国经济的不确定性可能会使本月晚些时候降息成为合理选择。

İlgili Okumalar

After Changxin, Yushu Takes the Lead: The Value and Weight of the First Humanoid Robot Stock

On August 19, 2026, Unitree Robotics (688836.SH), known as China's "first humanoid robotics stock," officially listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's STAR Market. The stock opened at 1,100 yuan, a surge of 629.44% from its 150.80 yuan IPO price, with its market capitalization briefly reaching 445 billion yuan. This highlights intense market enthusiasm for the humanoid robot sector. The IPO was characterized by high demand and low circulation, with only 7.44% of shares initially tradable. This scarcity, coupled with strong investor interest (record-high participation and a low 0.0181% lottery win rate), contributed to the dramatic price surge. Founder Wang Xingxing, holding over 31% of shares, saw his wealth exceed 110 billion yuan, making him China's wealthiest "post-90s" entrepreneur. Major institutional backers like Meituan, DeepSeek, Tencent, and Sequoia China also reaped substantial gains. Key to the valuation is Unitree's status as a profitable company in a field where many competitors are not. In 2025, it achieved 600 million yuan in adjusted net profit and delivered over 5,500 humanoid robots, ranking first globally in shipments. However, over 70% of its humanoid revenue still comes from R&D and education, with industrial applications accounting for only about 9%, indicating early-stage commercialization. The company faces competition from global players like Figure AI (est. $39-40B valuation), Boston Dynamics, and Tesla's Optimus, as well as domestic rivals like Zhiyuan and Ubtech. To become the "global humanoid robotics leader," its market cap would need to exceed 500 billion yuan. Market opinions on its future are divided: optimists cite its profitability, leading shipments, and strategic tie-up with DeepSeek; the cautious point to high valuations and unproven mass-market adoption; a neutral view expects a post-surge consolidation into an "earnings verification phase." Risks include high valuation digestion pressure, slower-than-expected commercialization in industrial/household settings, potential US FCC regulatory impacts on new models, intense competition, rapid technological iteration, and short-term stock volatility. The IPO marks a significant milestone, but Unitree's path to becoming a global leader remains challenging.

Odaily星球日报43 dk önce

After Changxin, Yushu Takes the Lead: The Value and Weight of the First Humanoid Robot Stock

Odaily星球日报43 dk önce

Century-Old Interlocking Director Law Revived, a16z Faces Antitrust Investigation

The US Department of Justice has reportedly launched an antitrust investigation into venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). The probe focuses on whether a16z's investment partners have improperly held board seats at competing artificial intelligence companies, specifically Databricks Inc. and Fivetran Inc. a16z co-founder Ben Horowitz sits on Databricks' board, while partner Martin Casado is a board member at Fivetran. Both companies are direct competitors in the business of collecting, organizing, and analyzing large-scale enterprise data. The investigation has run parallel to the DOJ's review of Fivetran's acquisition of a similar company, dbt Labs, which was completed last year and ultimately approved. A potential resolution could require the a16z partners to resign from one of the competing boards, a common remedy in similar cases during the Biden administration. The probe highlights the enforcement of a 1914 law against "interlocking directorates," where individuals or entities serve on the boards of rival firms. This case is notable as the alleged conflict involves multiple partners from the same firm, rather than a single individual. a16z, managing $90 billion in assets, is a major political donor and has significant influence in AI policy. The investigation's outcome remains uncertain, and the DOJ may ultimately take no action.

marsbit1 saat önce

Century-Old Interlocking Director Law Revived, a16z Faces Antitrust Investigation

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit1 saat önce

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit1 saat önce

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit1 saat önce

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片