蓝港互动加密资产持仓远超股票市值,一览王峰的“港股微策略”实验

marsbit2025-09-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-10 tarihinde güncellendi

一家港股上市的游戏公司,其持有的加密资产市值竟比公司总市值还高出约15%,王峰领导的蓝港互动正通过一系列激进但透明的加密资产布局重塑自身价值。

加密资产

9月9日晚,蓝港互动集团有限公司(8267.HK)发布自愿公告,披露了其最新的加密货币持仓情况:集团直接持有116枚比特币,通过参股公司间接持有96枚比特币,合计达212枚比特币;直接持有663枚以太坊。

通过参股公司间接持有1377枚以太坊,总计2040枚;Solana的合计持有量更是达到18205枚。

与此同时,公司宣布了三项关键战略决策:对比特币进行战略性增持、启动以太坊与Solana的质押计划,以及通过旗下LK Crypto部门深入参与两大公链生态系统建设。

加密资产持仓,已成蓝港核心资产

这并不是蓝港互动首次披露其加密资产持有情况。早在8月13日,公司就曾发布公告,披露了其加密资产持仓,当时集团合计持有193.08枚比特币、1,707.63枚以太坊和14,057枚SOL。

对比两次数据可以发现,在不到一个月的时间内,蓝港互动明显增持了加密货币。

在Solana方面,持有量从14,057枚增加至18,205枚,增幅近30%,这充分体现了公司对加密资产,尤其是Solana的看好程度。

更值得关注的是,蓝港互动还罕见地公布了其持仓平均成本:比特币约为73,015美元,以太坊约为3,155美元,Solana约为165美元。

这种透明度在上市公司中颇为难得,也为投资者提供了评估公司加密资产投资能力的重要参考。


战略方向调整,质押与生态建设成重点

蓝港互动此次不仅仅是简单披露持仓,更重要的是公布了其未来的加密资产战略方向。公司宣布了三项关键举措。

首先是​​战略性增持比特币​​。公司明确表示持续视比特币为加密货币市场的主要储备资产,并将视市场情况择机进行战略性增持。这一策略与微策略公司(MicroStrategy)颇为相似,后者已成为上市公司持有比特币的典范。

其次是启动​​以太坊与SOL质押计划​​。集团计划将这两种资产投入各生态主网的质押机制,以提升资产使用效率、获取链上收益。这不仅能够带来额外的收益来源,更能进一步提升资产收益潜力和链上参与度。

第三是​​深入参与生态系统建设​​。通过旗下特定加密货币业务部门LK Crypto启动专项研究,参与以太坊与SOL生态系统中关键基础设施发展与业务协作。公司特别看好这两大公链在“成熟可编程性、安全性与稳定性”方面的优势。

蓝港互动还首次创立了Ondo Finance (ONDO)的持仓,探索其在RWA(现实世界资产上链)赛道的战略潜力,这显示公司正在不断拓展其加密资产投资边界。


LK Crypto部门,专业管理加密资产

蓝港互动的加密资产由专门的加密货币事业部“LK Crypto”统一管理。该部门拥有一支由资深投资人、技术专家、链上数据分析师及合规顾问等组成的多元化专业团队。

核心成员平均具有逾八年加密货币及区块链行业经验,熟悉去中心化交易平台(DEX)、去中心化金融(DeFi)及链上数据分析等领域,使LK Crypto在加密资产配置、风险管理及长期价值挖掘方面具备成熟的管理体系。

为确保在波动性较高的加密市场中保持稳健且具灵活性的资产管理能力,LK Crypto严格执行多重签名托管、实时链上监控等安全及风险控制措施。

这种专业化的管理团队和风险控制措施,为上市公司投资加密资产提供了重要的制度保障。


盈利贡献显著,加密资产带来转亏为盈

加密资产投资不仅为蓝港互动带来了资产结构的改变,更直接贡献了实实在在的盈利。

8月26日,蓝港互动发布盈利预告,预期2025年上半年转亏为盈。

公司预计将取得经调整净溢利约为人民币1110万元至人民币1350万元,而2024年上半年则取得经调整亏损净额约人民币1300万元。

董事会明确表示,业绩改善“​​主要由于本集团持有加密货币所带来的回报​​”。这一陈述直接肯定了加密资产投资对公司财务表现的积极影响。

在传统业务表现平平的背景下,加密资产带来的回报成为公司扭转业绩的关键因素,这也部分解释了为什么蓝港互动会如此积极地布局加密资产领域。


1亿美元资管计划,向外部投资者开放

加密资产

蓝港互动并不满足于仅仅自身持有加密资产。

8月13日的公告中还透露,集团拟通过LK Crypto启动总规模为1亿美元的资产管理及募资计划。

此计划将包含集团现有资金及持有的加密资产,并向市场开放,引入外部投资者共同参与。集团及其参股公司当前持有的比特币、以太坊及SOL等资产,为该计划提供坚实基础与透明背书。

根据规划,资金将重点配置于:具备长期增长潜力的优质加密货币资产、Web3生态基础设施项目,以及与集团战略发展方向相关的全球优质权益类资产。

此项措施旨在进一步扩大集团在全球加密资产与Web3领域的战略布局。


王峰的加密信仰,创始人引领战略转型

加密资产

蓝港互动如此All in Web3和加密资产,与创始人​​王峰​​的理念密切相关。

9月4日,王峰在推文中表达了对微策略公司的看法:“我今天和一位朋友说,不要把微策略和今天跟风的各种NEXT微策略当成一种类型的公司,或者说不要那么轻易地相信他们有人必然会成为NEXT微策略。”

他强调:“人家可是经过比特币多轮牛熊,创始人不是临时拉来的演员,真正的人旗合一,坚持做自己想做的事情、才到今天的位置。”

这番话既表达了对微策略的尊重,也暗示了蓝港互动想要成为真正意义上的“下一个微策略”需要具备的条件和坚持。


股价与资产价值,显著低估的MNAV比率

加密资产

截至9月9日,蓝港互动(HK:08267) 股票价格为0.66港元,总市值为2.44亿港元。然而,公司当前加密资产市值约为3600万美元(约2.8亿港币),这一数字甚至比公司总市值还高出约15%。

MNAV比率(市值/净资产比率)为0.87,这一数字表明其股价严重低估。通常情况下,上市公司的市值应该高于其净资产价值,但蓝港互动的情况却相反。

这种低估可能反映了市场几个方面的担忧:一是加密资产的高波动性可能带来的价值波动;二是公司传统业务(游戏和影视)的表现不佳;三是市场对上市公司大量持有加密资产的认可度尚不足。

从另一角度观察,这种低估也可能为投资者提供了机会,这种罕见的“市值倒挂”现象,暗示着市场可能尚未充分认识到蓝港互动加密资产的价值。

特别是对于那些看好加密资产长期价值但又不想直接持有加密资产的传统投资者来说,通过投资蓝港互动股票间接持有加密资产可能是一个值得考虑的选择。


差异化策略,港股的独特存在

蓝港互动的持仓结构折射出港股上市公司配置加密资产的差异化策略。在港股一众加密概念的上市公司中,蓝港互动也是独具一格的。

不同于一些公司仅仅简单持有比特币,蓝港互动选择了​​比特币、以太坊和Solana​​三种核心资产组合,同时还探索RWA等新兴赛道。

这种组合既包含了比特币作为“数字黄金”的价值存储功能,也包含了以太坊和Solana作为智能合约平台的发展潜力,同时还通过ONDO等资产探索RWA这一新兴领域。

公司不仅单纯持有资产,还通过质押计划提升资产效率,通过专项研究深入参与生态系统建设,通过资管计划引入外部投资者共同参与。这种全方位、多层次的参与方式,在上市公司中颇为罕见。

蓝港互动在港股市场上的这种独特定位,使其成为研究上市公司参与加密资产的重要案例,也为其他上市公司提供了可参考的模式。


结语

随着比特币和以太坊机构化趋势不可逆转,像蓝港互动这样早期且透明布局加密资产的上市公司,可能会吸引更多寻求加密资产暴露而又不想直接持有加密货币的传统投资者。

而蓝港互动能否成为港股市场的“微策略”,不仅取决于加密市场本身的发展,更取决于公司能否将其加密资产优势转化为持续的盈利能力和股东价值。



İlgili Okumalar

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

Microsoft has halted the widespread internal use of Claude Code, withdrawing licenses from most employees by the end of its fiscal year, June 30, 2026. This reversal comes just six months after actively promoting the AI coding tool to boost productivity via "vibe coding"—where developers describe intent in natural language and let the LLM generate code. The core issue isn't the tool's effectiveness; internal reports suggest employees preferred Claude Code over Microsoft's own Copilot CLI. The problem is financial: the "copilot mode" adds a variable, consumption-based token cost on top of existing employee salaries without a proportional revenue increase. As usage grew, the token bills became unsustainable, leading to what sources describe as a cost-structure failure. Similar overruns have been reported at other firms like Uber. The article contrasts this with the approach of AI-native startups, exemplified by Y Combinator's philosophy. Here, high token consumption is strategic—it replaces, rather than supplements, human labor. Startups operate with tiny teams where AI agents handle work previously done by many, making the high token bill financially viable as it offsets much larger personnel costs. The conclusion is that "vibe coding" isn't dead, but its economics fail within traditional corporate structures that treat AI as a productivity add-on for existing staff. Success requires a foundational shift to an AI-native organization, where processes are built to be "legible to AI," and the company's core knowledge and assets reside in documented, AI-accessible systems rather than solely in employees' minds. The future divide will be between companies that merely add AI tools and those that redesign their organizations around them.

marsbitŞimdi

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

marsbitŞimdi

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit1 saat önce

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit1 saat önce

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手1 saat önce

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手1 saat önce

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

The article titled "Ethereum Becomes a Chinese Concept Stock" presents a critical analysis of Ethereum's perceived decline in market confidence and its structural parallels to Chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges. It begins by noting significant sell-offs by early investors like Wanxiang and key figures like Bankless's Hoffman in 2026, despite Ethereum's strong fundamental activity. The piece questions the erosion of trust in Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation (EF), arguing that while other ecosystems have faced founder controversies, Ethereum's issues stem from its internal governance model. The author draws a direct comparison to "China concept stocks," which are Chinese businesses operating globally but reliant on foreign capital and listings. Similarly, Ethereum, funded early by Chinese capital like Wanxiang, developed a strong institutional framework from its IXO to its PoS transition. The core problem, according to the article, is a leadership vacuum regarding price and direction. Vitalik's move to make the EF smaller and less active is framed as a mistake. While he advocates for ETH as a "commodity," the ecosystem lacks a clear entity to steward its price stability, creating tension within the PoS system, as seen with Lido's challenges. The narrative suggests that excessive abstraction and a hands-off approach from the EF have left the community adrift, contrasting with more proactive foundations like Solana's. The article then examines emerging technical narratives for Ethereum: privacy (ZK-proofs), AI integration, and a refocus on Layer-1. However, it observes a shift from Ethereum leading as a "world computer" to merely adapting to trends like AI, where crypto-native projects are finding success independently of Ethereum. The piece posits that Ethereum's unique value in an increasingly fragmented world may be as a permissionless, global financial testing ground—a neutral platform amid geopolitical tensions. In conclusion, it asserts that Ethereum's fate mirrors that of China concept stocks: an asset born from one region (conceptually "A"), funded by another ("B"), and dependent on "B" for exit liquidity. While Ethereum's "golden age" may be over, and selling pressure from early backers will continue, it remains positioned as a critical linkage point in a divided global landscape, standing at a new, albeit uncertain, starting point.

marsbit1 saat önce

Ethereum Reduced to a Chinese Concept Stock

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片