创作者代币或将成为新的暴富神话聚集地

深潮2025-09-03 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-04 tarihinde güncellendi

创作者代币将成为人类文明史上发明过的最健全、最强大的注意力货币。

撰文:Primitive Astronaut

编译:AididiaoJP,Foresight News

加密推特里的 meme 赛道已经逐渐衰亡,战壕中的人们在痛苦地争夺最后的面包屑。

正如 @notthreadguy 在直播中喜欢说,这是一个「看空赌场」。

从任何指标来看,meme 赛道都不处于牛市。

但所有得主流币都接近或超过了历史最高点(ATH)。

实际上,加密市场总市值也处于历史最高点,从未有过如此多的已实现价值和资金流入。

资金都锁定在 ETF、CEX(中心化交易所)、财库公司等。

Saylor、Tom Lee、Robinhood、Stripes,甚至 SEC 他们都是推高走势的人。但这一次,并非所有的赛道都在随潮上涨。

meme 赛道的资金已经接近枯竭了。

正如你现在应该知道的那样,P 小将的心态是最佳的反向交易信号之一。

「散户再也不会回来了」 @Cupseyy 一边看着一个 60 万美元的垃圾币归零一边说道,即使以他的专业知识也无法识别那是捆绑交易。

但那是错觉,夏天即将结束,散户要回来了,只是在另外一个赛道。

注意力是当今资本的最佳代表,这应该是常识,尤其是在我们行业。

不过,我想提醒你们的是,这一切都始于 Meme。

BTC 是创世的 Meme 币。如果没有那些「HODL」和「黄金 2.0」的 Meme,我们就不会有今天的地位,

后来出现了「超比特币化」和「去中心化金融」

如果不是因为那些 Meme,或者换句话说因为共同的信念,我们根本不会相信「对冲通胀」或「价值储存」的叙事。

所有的预言都是自我实现的。

共同的信念最初源于少数逆向且发声的观点,直到它们被越来越多的人认可和接受,直到形成庞大的社区。

然后这些社区宣称拥有该叙事,并对其进行重塑和精炼,使其成为自己的东西。

我在这里用 Murad 作为例子,因为现在每个人都知道他的名字。不仅因为他是 2024 年最出色的叙事构建者之一,还因为他在 CT 上两次达到了病毒式传播的顶峰。

他当时就已经是 CT 上的主角了,因为那个与 @APompliano 的「终极比特币辩论」播客。

非常不同的时代,但同样的主角历程。那期播客之后,CT 上的每个人都认识了他。尤其是那段传奇的摘录进行了病毒式传播。

当时真正发生的事情是他并没有说出比比特币极端主义者在小圈子里已经传播的内容更新或更逆向的观点。

他只是在一小时的播客中,将所有叙事和 Meme 编织在一起。并用出色的演讲技巧让普通听众豁然开朗。

以至于它成为了每个进入加密领域的人的学习内容,也成为了传播叙事 OG 们的参考内容。

他把一群新手变成了专业的推广者

创作者代币将成为人类文明史上发明过的最健全、最强大的注意力货币

这就是我要引导你们去理解的地方。

叙事、信念、狂热崇拜,它们都可以合并到一个人物中,一个单一的代币中。

这些信念和狂热崇拜可以存在于成千上万的亚文化中。

由你选择最好的,或者只是你最共鸣的那些。你的社交和准社交圈子会影响你的认知。

而当一个人进入未知的领域,比如 CT 和加密市场时,他们会求助于他们最熟悉的面孔的指导:他们最喜欢的影响者。

他们每个人的创作者代币都将成为最佳的上链引导工具。贪婪的持有者和拼命工作的人将把这些代币推到难以想象的高度。

它们将是这个周期的 DOGE 和 PEPE

  • 比任何 Web2 盈利模式都更好的收入分成

  • 收入分成模式也包括受众,在 Web2 平台上闻所未闻

  • 它将首先吸引愿意冒险的小创作者,然后飞轮效应带动越来越大牌的创作者

  • 创作者代币,虽然还远未达到最终形态,但对于新手来说,是比 Meme 币更好的切入点。

那些成功调制出「秘方」的人将获得巨大回报,去教育他们的受众,反过来,这些受众会进行传播。告诉他们的朋友,他们通过拥有自己最喜欢的影响者品牌的一部分而赚了大钱,并且还能额外获得收入分成。

新的传播渠道

CT 选择忽视 @pumpdotfun 和 @a1lon9 正在构建的东西。但请你们自己看看是否能确定这一切的走向

不确定即将到来的东西是否有 1% 在 CT 上被讨论过。

早在 7 月 24 日与 Threadguy 的采访中,Alon 就已经说过他希望 Pumpfun 成为一个社交中心,并成为 Web2 流媒体平台的竞争对手。

关于这件事,一切仍有待完成,但一切正在各就各位。

在 alon 的回复中有很多暗示。

如果你搜索推特,你会看到很多帖子提到关于 Pumpfun 公告的传言,据称针对收入分成模式,尤其是创作者代币。

具体的分成细则应该会在接下来几天内宣布,并为第四季度做准备。

显然,它可能发展到与创作者代币持有者分享交易费用,答案似乎很快就要揭晓了。

Coinbase 的布局

@base 和 @coinbase 也在这方面努力,Zora 超级反弹是有目共睹的,未来几个月应该会涨得更高,因为他们有 Coinbase 的支持,并且被 @brian_armstrong 推广

除此之外,Coinbase CEX 开放入口,可以直接在应用内购买 Base 链上的任何代币。

这直接回应了「机构不会买我们的币」的问题。轮换迟早会发生,而华尔街喜欢为内容创作者付费。

Base 应用将在未来两周内通过邀请开始走出封闭测试阶段。正如 @jessepollak 昨天在 @onchainsf 的 AMA 上所述。

视频链接

简而言之,Pumpfun 和 Base 正在悄无声息地竞争,想要成为人们每天早晨醒来打开的第一个应用,甚至想要取代 Web2 应用。

而创作者代币为这一愿景的成功带来了所有必要的成分和激励。

持仓

当然,Rug 行为不会消失,也不会通过创作者代币解决。这种情况将继续发生:

解决方案很简单:只选择那些已证明有非 Rug 记录的创作者。

不要购买第一天的炒作和启动项目。

寻找真正致力于建设游戏的创作者,即使他们的代币下跌 90% 也仍在坚持。

大多数都会是 Rug,这就是当今游戏的玩法,甚至包括那些风投基金支持的创始人。

极少数既表现出 Web2 纯粹内容打磨的热爱,又有意愿连接加密原生社区的人将会获得巨大成功。

在 Pumpfun 方面,有一些值得尊敬的人,他们是试图走向主流的加密原生者,比如 @rasmr_eth ; @gainzy222 ; @SolJakey 等。

但我们所缺乏的是合适的、Web2 知名面孔融入 CT 文化。

@diddyboplive 登场。

这孩子在没有任何人的帮助下启动,他是一个知名的 TikTok 博主,在他的两个 TikTok 账户上拥有 150 万粉丝和 65 万粉丝。他也是唯一一个拥有自己代币供应量不到 10% 且完全流通的创作者之一。

他在没有中间人拥有他全部供应量的情况下自行上链,并且仍在 X 和 Pumpfun 上每日建设。

他本可以在 Twitch 上开始直播,但他选择了 Pumpfun 来获得先发优势,这是对平台成功的一次有激励的赌注。

还没有人看到 Pumpfun 主播代币的价值,但一旦 Pumpfun 发布公告并开始大力推广创作者代币,这种情况就会改变。

他们别无选择,只能狠狠地拉盘,使它们对公众和其他创作者都具有吸引力。更不用说他们与 Base 和 Zora 正在进行的竞赛了。

没有人看到一个 TikTok 的 Z 世代登陆 CT 的价值,但昨天改变了

他被那个狂热崇拜者注意到了。

SPX6900 狂热崇拜者在过去几个月里一直试图在 TikTok 上发展。

你听说过 Web2 品牌支付如此高的溢价来获得最大的创作者作为广告商吗?当 Web3 品牌介入游戏时会发生什么?

极少数能够成为 Web2 和 Web3 之间适当桥梁的 Web2 创作者,融合两种文化,并且这样做不仅仅是为了快钱,将会取得巨大的成功。

你正在通过 threadguy & phantom, @0xBreadguy & MegaETH, @beast_ico & @ProofOfPlay 看到它的早期发展迹象。

但这些家伙仍然是加密原生的。

当 Diddybop 开始制作他的第一个 SPX6900 帖子时,我预见到他的 $DIDDYBOP 代币会大幅重新定价。

创作者代币作为注意力货币的用例。

年轻一代在历史上一直引领潮流。

Murad 是对的,人们喜欢开玩笑。但确实存在非零的可能性,SPX 真正成为 Z 世代的比特币。

最重要的是,我预见到整个创作者类别会大幅重新定价,并开始一场将成功的 Web2 创作者转变为加密原生创作者的大竞赛。

其他可能更大的创作者会出现。但就此事而言,Diddy 有一个很大的先发优势:他证明了自己在足够长的时间里是坚持创作的的。

许多代币和项目都想成为 Z 世代自己的比特币。

他们将是重新占领 CT 的人。

İlgili Okumalar

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

On May 19, Bitroot, an emerging Layer 1 blockchain, participated in the Tencent Cloud AI Summit in Singapore alongside key industry players like Solana Foundation. The event explored the intersection of AI infrastructure, enterprise applications, AI Agents, and Web3. Bitroot's invitation, despite being pre-mainnet, highlights industry interest in its focus on high-performance, AI-native architecture tailored for future AI Agent execution and verifiable on-chain automation. Bitroot CEO Juan Jose emphasized that AI competition is shifting from model performance to data, real-world application scenarios, and trust infrastructure. He argued that for AI Agents to evolve from assistants to autonomous executors managing transactions and assets, they require low-latency, low-cost, and high-throughput blockchain environments. Bitroot aims to address this through its EVM-compatible design, optimistic parallel execution, and a consensus mechanism targeting high scalability. Currently in its Testnet 5.0 phase, Bitroot reports metrics like over 50,000 peak TPS and sub-0.3 second average block time. Its narrative positions it within a growing landscape where next-generation Layer 1s like Monad and Aptos also compete on performance, while Bitroot differentiates by integrating AI computational capabilities natively across its stack. The summit underscored that the fusion of AI and Web3 is moving from concept to infrastructure competition, where networks balancing performance, security, and verifiability will be crucial for enabling scalable AI-driven applications.

marsbit4 dk önce

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

marsbit4 dk önce

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds Aligned in Q1: Dumping Software, Buying Chips A clear consensus emerged among major U.S. hedge funds and mutual funds in Q1: they were simultaneously selling software stocks and pouring capital into the semiconductor sector. This aggressive rotation pushed semiconductor exposure in hedge fund long portfolios to a record high. Hedge funds delivered a 7% return year-to-date, while only 30% of large-cap active mutual funds outperformed their benchmarks. The average short interest for S&P 500 constituents rose to 3% of market cap, the highest since 2011. Within technology, the structural shift was stark. Hedge funds' semiconductor weighting hit an all-time high, while software fell to its lowest since 2019. Excluding Microsoft, mutual funds' relative overexposure to semis vs. software was the largest since 2012. Microsoft was among the most net-sold stocks by both groups. Hedge funds net purchased semiconductor names like LRCX and AMAT. Strategies diverged on leverage and cash. Hedge funds increased their net exposure to near a one-year high after an initial cut. Mutual funds raised their cash allocation, though it remains historically low at 1.4%. Sector alignment was high in Industrials (both overweight) but divergent in Tech: hedge funds increased their Tech net tilt by a record 853 basis points, while mutual funds reduced theirs. Clear splits also appeared in Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Four stocks appeared on both Goldman's hedge fund VIP and mutual fund overweight lists: BA, MA, MRVL, and V. This "shared favorites" basket has returned 10% YTD, outperforming the equal-weight S&P 500. Notably, all "Magnificent Seven" stocks are on the hedge fund VIP list but are uniformly underweighted by mutual funds.

marsbit14 dk önce

Hedge Fund Q1 Interpretation: Everyone Is Selling Software, Buying Chips

marsbit14 dk önce

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

The Evolution of Physical Bitcoin Bitcoin's digital nature is its core strength, enabling self-custody and rapid global transfers. However, its intangibility also hinders mainstream adoption. For over a decade, creators have attempted to materialize Bitcoin while preserving its cash-like properties, yielding notable results. Casascius Coins, launched in 2011, were the first and most iconic physical Bitcoin. Creator Mike Caldwell generated private keys offline, printed them on coins, and sealed them with tamper-evident holograms. This model relied on user trust in the centralized issuer. Production ceased in 2013 due to regulatory pressure from FinCEN. RavenBit Coins emerged in 2014 aiming to decentralize minting by letting users generate and apply their own keys. However, this led to trust issues with numerous untrusted minters and insecure key generation methods. In 2016, Coinkite introduced Opendimes—a breakthrough in bearer asset technology. These USB-shaped devices generate and store keys internally. Funds can be received by checking the public key, but spending requires physically breaking the device to extract the private key. While innovative and open-source, its cost (~$20) and form factor limit its use for small, everyday transactions. Satochip's Satodime, a card-shaped device using similar secure chip technology, followed. It supports NFC interaction and comes in various forms. While potentially cheaper in bulk (~13€), it remains a high-security hardware wallet, not a low-cost cash substitute. A fundamental cost barrier exists. For physical Bitcoin to achieve widespread commercial use, hardware costs must drop below $1 to match the production cost of fiat banknotes. Current secure chips capable of running Bitcoin's cryptographic algorithms (like secp256k1) are too expensive. Chips like NXP's NTAG X DNA (~$3) show cost-reduction potential but lack native Bitcoin curve support. Projects like OfflineCash embed chips in banknote-like paper, but face challenges with durability, the need for custom Bitcoin-enabled chips, and the inherent requirement for users to verify balances online—which conflicts with Bitcoin's trustless ideal. Coinkite's Tapsigner, a ~$20 card with a proprietary Bitcoin NFC chip, is seen as a more practical step forward. It functions as a reloadable hardware wallet for contactless payments, solving the "change" problem and focusing on real-world retail integration, a direction also pursued by companies like Cash App and Square. In summary, the journey to physical Bitcoin has progressed from trusted centralized mints (Casascius) to user-generated keys (RavenBit) and finally to self-contained secure hardware (Opendimes, Satodime, Tapsigner). The core challenge remains developing a sufficiently low-cost, durable, and truly trustless physical bearer asset that can function like cash in daily transactions. Current solutions are either too expensive or introduce new trust assumptions, keeping the ideal of ubiquitous physical Bitcoin just out of reach for now.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Evolution Path of Physical Bitcoin

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片