Джастин Сан празднует получение «Троном» одобрения правительства США

cryptonews.ru2025-01-31 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-09-01 tarihinde güncellendi

  • Основатель Tron Джастин Сан празднует крупную победу после того, как был выбран правительством США
  • Джастин Сан празднует, поскольку правительство США выбрало Трон в качестве одного из девяти энергоблоков для публикации официальных данных о ВВП в сети.The US Commerce Dept. is now publishing its GDP data on nine public blockchains, including Tron (TRX)
  • Этот шаг рассматривается как «знак одобрения» и огромная проверка для всей сети Tron.

Министерство торговли США начало публиковать официальные данные о ВВП на девяти блокчейнах, включая сеть Tron Джастина Сана. Но дело не в технологиях, а в политике.

Министерство торговли Трампа использует блокчейн для продвижения идеи «крипто-президента»

Официальное заявление представляет собой тщательно продуманный политический посыл, в котором блокчейн используется для подтверждения положительных экономических показателей и укрепления репутации «крипто-президента» администрации Трампа.

𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗡 𝗠𝗔𝗞𝗘𝗦 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗔𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗨.𝗦 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗦 𝗧𝗥𝗫 𝗔𝗦 𝗔 𝗚𝗟𝗢𝗕𝗔𝗟 𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗖𝗞𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗥🧵

The U.S. Department of Commerce selected Tron as one of nine elite blockchains to record Q2 2025 GDP data.

Come to think of it… pic.twitter.com/2lRfEiOx9r

— Leila (@chimpnzee) September 1, 2025

Кто получил одобрение правительства США?

Выбор правительством конкретных блокчейнов и партнеров — это масштабный акт проверки, фактически создающий список признанных на федеральном уровне партнеров в области блокчейнов.

Какие девять блокчейнов были выбраны?

Согласно официальному заявлению, Министерство торговли опубликовало хэш-версию пересмотренного отчета Бюро экономического анализа по ВВП за второй квартал 2025 года, в котором зафиксирован рост на 3,3% по девяти блокчейнам: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Tron, Stellar, Avalanche, Arbitrum One, Polygon PoS и Optimism.

Какие инфраструктурные партнеры были задействованы?

Данные были далее распространены через сервисы Oracle Pyth и Chainlink, при этом такие биржи, как Coinbase, Gemini и Kraken, оказали помощь в процессе публикации.

Министр торговли США Говард Лютник назвал это событие важной вехой в усилиях администрации Трампа по превращению Америки в «мировую столицу блокчейна».

Как отреагировали ключевые игроки, такие как Джастин Сан?

Проекты, отобранные для участия, уже начали использовать новости в качестве серьезной поддержки.

Что по этому поводу думает Джастин Сан?

Джастин Сан, основатель Tron, приветствовал эту новость в социальных сетях, назвав ее мощным сигналом растущей роли блокчейна в правительственных проектах.

Tron has been officially selected by the U.S. Department of Commerce as one of nine blockchains to record the release of the United States’ Q2 2025 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data. https://t.co/7d3VIBzROk

— H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 (Astronaut Version) (@justinsuntron) September 1, 2025

По теме: Джастин Сан намекает на еще одно заявление, которое может повлиять на рынок, касательно TRON

Как это вписывается в более широкую стратегию Tron?

Эта новость появилась на фоне активных действий сети по привлечению пользователей и активности: недавно Tron одобрил снижение комиссий на 60%. Эта государственная проверка добавляет ещё один важный фактор в историю роста сети.

По теме: Tron одобряет снижение сетевой комиссии на 60%: краткосрочный успех, долгосрочный рост

Что это означает для будущего правительства и криптовалюты?

Эта инициатива создает весомый прецедент относительно того, как правительство США может в дальнейшем использовать технологию блокчейна.

Каково долгосрочное политическое послание?

Это явно преподносится как ключевая часть обещания администрации Трампа сделать Америку «мировой столицей блокчейна»..»

Зафиксировав положительный показатель роста ВВП на блокчейне в размере 3,3%, администрация эффективно использует технологию в качестве инструмента обмена сообщениями.

Министр Лютник подытожил, что цель состоит в том, чтобы сделать «экономическую правду» Америки непреложной и доступной во всем мире, как никогда ранее.

Trend Kriptolar

İlgili Okumalar

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit42 dk önce

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit42 dk önce

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit1 saat önce

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit1 saat önce

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit1 saat önce

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit1 saat önce

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbit1 saat önce

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

TRX Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! TRON (TRX) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında TRON (TRX) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: TRON (TRX) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınTRON (TRX) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: TRON (TRX) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında TRON (TRX) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

1.6k Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.10Güncellenme 2026.06.02

TRX Nasıl Satın Alınır

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların TRX (TRX) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.

活动图片