How Whales Buy the Bottom of a Market Crash

NFTGo2022-06-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-06-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Whales share a number of strategies in common, such as buying in batches and buying more when prices fall. Each of them also has its own secrets to maximizing the outcome.

Key takeaways:

Whales' preferences when buying at the bottom: Bored Ape Yacht Club > other Yuga Labs' projects > other blue chips and emerging projects. The exact type and price of purchase are correlated with capital size.

Among whales with a capital size of more than $500,000, some focus on only one collection, while others adhere to a diversified combination. The majority of whales are willing to spend from $100,000 to $250,000, but their costs vary.

Whales share a number of strategies in common, such as buying in batches and buying more when prices fall. Each of them also has its own secrets to maximizing the outcome.

The crypto market went through an abrupt plunge from June 7 to June 18. This article will answer the following questions:

What NFTs did whales buy? How did they manage to buy at the bottom?

What are the combinations and average prices involved?

Determining the time frame

The crypto market has been in a downward spiral since the first half of this year. In the last two weeks (June 7-18), the BTC price has continued to fall, with a two-week drop of over 40%. On the other hand, ETH also fell below $1,000 at one point due to the impact of Celsius.

BTC Price (Source: CMC)

Similarly, the NFT market has suffered the impact of the market downturn. OpenSea trading volume has been bearish lately, but statistics from June 7 to 18 showed a brief period of heavy trading where a high turnover rate was witnessed in the NFT market. For this reason, we will focus our analysis on this time frame.

Trading Volume on OpenSea (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

What NFTs did the Whales Buy?

Having sorted through thousands of whale wallets, we first place our focus on the top 10 best-selling NFTs among whales. Otherdeed seems to be the most popular collection among whale buyers. A total of 173 Otherdeed NFTs were bought by whales during this period, with an average purchase price of 6.22 ETH, or $9410. On the other hand, Bored Ape Yacht Club is the tenth most popular collection, as 25 were purchased by whales, with an average purchase price of 135 ETH, or $179,849.

In addition to blue-chip NFTs, we also see some non-blue-chip projects on the ranking, such as tubby cats by TubbyCatsDeployer which places second. Whales bought 104 NFTs of this collection. According to on-chain data, whales are bulk-purchasing this collection, which may be because they are laying the groundwork for future plans. Most whales still adhere to their strategies despite the 40% drop in BTC.

Top 10 Best-Selling NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

By multiplying quantity purchased with transacted price (USD), we have another list of the top 10 most spent-on NFTs among whales that seems to be more in line with the market consensus. When BTC price dropped sharply from June 7-18, we found that the whales category alone had bought $4.5 million worth of Bored Ape Yacht Club, $1.88 million worth of CryptoPunks, and $1.72 million worth of Otherdeed.

It's worth noting that the top 3 on the list are Yuga Labs' projects. The amount spent on BAYC is significantly higher than the sum of the second and the third. It is clear that when the market crashes, the buying preference of whales goes like this: Bored Ape Yacht Club > other Yuga Labs' projects > other blue chips and emerging projects.

Top 10 Most Purchased NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Which Whales Exactly?

Since ETH prices were volatile during this period (June 7-18), we will compare the amount spent by whales using USD as the standard.

Whales Who Bought Over $500,000 Worth of NFTs (Source: NFTGo.io)

As seen from the chart above, 5 whales bought more than $500,000 worth of NFTs. The top 3 of them tend to buy into one single project. For example, the first place wallet, btok1024.eth, spent 1024 ETH only on BAYC, which is a rather extreme case. The second place wallet, franklinisbored.eth, bought 7 BAYC NFTs, and the third place wallet, n0b0dy.eth, bought 17 Otherdeed NFTs.

We begin to observe diversity in the combination of NFTs bought, starting with the fourth place wallet, including 2 Meebits + 6 Doodles + 9 Bored Ape Kennel Club + 3 Bored Ape Yacht Club + 5 Clone X + 2 Moonbirds + 2 Otherdeed. Moreover, the fifth whale went with 4 Murakami.Flowers + 4 Bored Ape Yacht Club + 2 Clone X.

NFTs Bought by the Top 5 Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

Among the whales that bought over $50,000 worth of NFTs, those that spent anywhere from $100,000 to $250,000 were the most common. In fact, there were 16 of them. According to the amount spent, the ranking and average costs are as follows:

Otherdeed: $152,373.80

Bored Ape Yacht Club: $82,259.15

CryptoPunks: $35,753.61

Art Blocks: $24,962.94

Clone X: $15,214.22

Whale Distribution According to Capital Size (Source: NFTGo.io)

NFTs in the $100k-$250k Category Bought by Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

The Average Amount (USD) Spent by Whales with Between $100k-$250k Plunge Capital (Source: NFTGo.io)

Probing Into the Strategies

Among the top 10 whales who bought Otherdeed within the time frame, the #1 whale bought 55 Otherdeed NFTs with 112.97 ETH ($160,000). As of June 21, Otherdeed's floor price rose to 2.4 ETH, thus making a gain of 17%, or 19.25 ETH, for the whale. Let's see how he managed to do it with $160,000.

Otherdeed Whale Ranking (6.7-6.18) (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

From June 7, when Otherdeed's floor price gradually decreased, the whale began to buy 6 from the collection with an average price of 2.596 ETH.

Then, on June 9, Otherdeeds's floor price fell below 2.5 ETH. The whale once again bought another 10 with an average price of 2.368 ETH, thus reducing the cost of his short-term position to 2.45 ETH.

The plunge accelerated on June 12 that the floor price dropped to 1.8 ETH. This is when the whale made his final purchase of 39 Otherdeed NFTs with an average price of 1.89 ETH. By this time, his average cost is 2.05 ETH.

The Purchase Interval of Otherdeed's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

Otherdeed's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Overall, the whale's strategy is to gradually increase its position: the greater the decline, the more it buys. Purchase prices are divided into 3 ranges: 2.5-2.7 ETH, 2.3-2.5 ETH, and 1.7-2 ETH, where it bought 6, 10, and 39 respectively, lowering the average price to about 2.05 ETH.

Another thing worth noting is that when Otherdeed's price rebounded from June 13 to 15, the whale continued to buy instead of realizing its gains. This indicates that the whale adheres to its valuation, therefore, if the price remains in the "bottom range," it will continue to buy.

One interesting thing is that among its 55 purchases at the bottom, 34 were bought through offers and the remaining 21 were through direct purchases. This is the little secret to its success—people tend to prefer to offer prices amid the market downturns.

Additionally, Otherdeed's price trend shows that trading volume peaked on June 13, when the floor price dropped to a low of 1.8 ETH. This proves that many others were also trying to buy at the bottom besides whales.

Otherdeed's Trading Volume and Floor Price (Source: NFTGo.io)

Next, let's have a look at the whale who made the most BAYC purchases during June 7-18 and see how it was done.

Starting from the price on June 7, he bought 1 BAYC NFT when it dropped by 10%. Then on June 13, the price dropped by 20%, so he made another purchase. After that, he bought 5 more when the price fell by 20%-30%, thus reducing his costs to 80 ETH. On June 14, the whale bought BAYC NFTs in the top 10% rarity with 120 ETH on LooksRare.

The Purchase Interval of BAYC's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

BAYC's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

The whale buys into BAYC based on the range of price drop. For every 10% slump, it would buy 1 NFT. Plus, this whale also bought NFTs of different rarities by category.

Through the analysis above, we can conclude some underlying rules whales go by when buying at the bottom:

For individual NFTs, bought in batches (3 batches) according to ranges, and buy as soon as the price enters your valuation range.

Buy according to the margin of the plunge instead of time—the more it slumps, the more you buy.

Try to make an offer.

For main blue chips, go by rarity classification; for new and emerging blue chips, diversify your combinations.

Try out multiple platforms including X2Y2 and LooksRare instead of limiting yourself to OpenSea.

Note: The above information is for informational purposes only. Investing in digital assets such as NFTs and cryptocurrency brings with it a high degree of risk. Please consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions. NFTGo does not provide financial advice and is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of investing in digital assets.

İlgili Okumalar

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手8 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手8 dk önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit43 dk önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit43 dk önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit49 dk önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit49 dk önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News54 dk önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News54 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片