Bitcoin’s short-term price prospects slightly improved, but most traders are far from optimistic

Cointelegraph2022-06-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-06-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

A mild sense of hope emerged among Bitcoin (BTC) investors after the June 18 drop to $17,600 becomes more distant and an early ascending pattern points toward $21,000 in the short-term.

Bitcoin 12-hour USD price at FTX. Source: TradingViewRecent negative remarks from lawmakers continued to curb investor optimism. In an interview with Cointelegraph, Swiss National Bank (SNB) deputy head Thomas Muser said that the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem would cease to exist if current financial regulations are implemented in the crypto industry.
An article published in "The People's Daily" on June 26 mentioned the Terra network's collapse and local blockchain expert, Yifan He referred to crypto as a Ponzi scheme. When asked by Cointelegraph to clarify the statement on June 27, Yifan He stated that "all unregulated cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin are Ponzi schemes based on my understanding."
On June 24 Sopnendu Mohanty the chief FinTech officer of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) pledged to be "brutal and unrelentingly hard" on any "bad behavior" from the cryptocurrency industry.
Ultimately, Bitcoin investors face mixed sentiment as some think the bottom is in and $20,000 is support. Meanwhile, others fear the impact that a global recession could have on risk assets. For this reason, traders should analyze derivatives markets data to understand if traders are pricing higher odds of a downturn.
Bitcoin futures show a balanced force between buyers and sellers
Retail traders usually avoid monthly futures because their price differs from regular spot markets at Coinbase, Bitstamp and Kraken. Still, those are professional traders' preferred instruments as they avoid the funding rate fluctuation of the perpetual contracts.
These fixed-month contracts usually trade at a slight premium to spot markets because investors demand more money to withhold the settlement. Consequently, futures should trade at a 5% to 10% annualized premium in healthy markets. One should note that this feature is not exclusive to crypto markets.

Bitcoin 3-month futures’ annualized premium. Source: LaevitasWhenever this indicator fades or turns negative, this is an alarming, bearish red flag signaling a situation known as backwardation. The fact that the average premium barely touched the negative area while Bitcoin traded down to $17,600 is remarkable.
Despite currently holding an extremely low futures premium (basis rate), the market has kept a balanced demand between leverage buyers and sellers.
To exclude externalities specific to the futures instrument, traders must also analyze the Bitcoin options markets. For instance, the 25% delta skew shows when Bitcoin whales and arbitrage desks are overcharging for downside or upside protection.
During bearish markets, options investors give higher odds for a price crash, causing the skew indicator to rise above 12%. On the other hand, a market's generalized FOMO induces a negative 12% skew.

Bitcoin 30-day options 25% delta skew: Source: LaevitasAfter peaking at 36% on June 18, the highest-ever record, the indicator receded to the current 15%. Options markets had shown extreme risk-aversion until June 25, when the 25% delta skew finally broke below 18%.
The current 25% skew indicator continues to display higher risks of a downside from professional traders but it no longer sits at the levels reflecting extreme risk aversion.
The bottom could be in according to on-chain data
Some metrics suggest that Bitcoin may have bottomed on June 18 after miners sold significant quantities of BTC. According to Cointelegraph, this indicates that capitulation has already occurred and Glassnode, an on-chain analysis firm, demonstrated that the Bitcoin Mayer Multiple fell below 0.5 which is extremely rare and hasn't happened since 2015.
Whales and arbitrage desks might take some time to adjust after key players like Three Arrows Capital face serious contraction and liquidation risks due to lack of liquidity or excessive leverage. Until there's enough evidence that the contagion risk is alleviated, Bitcoin price probably continue to trade below $22,000.

İlgili Okumalar

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit7 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit7 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手14 dk önce

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手14 dk önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit48 dk önce

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit48 dk önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit55 dk önce

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit55 dk önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 saat önce

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures