Лидеры среди майнеров. Эксперты назвали самое прибыльное оборудование

cryptonews.ru2025-07-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-08-13 tarihinde güncellendi

Специалисты Intelion протестировали и сравнили 14 актуальных устройств для добычи биткоина

«РБК-Крипто» не дает инвестиционных советов, материал опубликован исключительно в ознакомительных целях. Криптовалюта — это волатильный актив, который может привести к финансовым убыткам.

В июле 2025 года наиболее эффективными с точки зрения соотношения цены оборудования, добычи биткоина (BTC) и расходов оказались три модели ASIC-майнеров от компании Bitmain, по данным оператора майнинговых дата-центов Intelion. Эксперты сравнили работу 14 устройств последних поколений и поделились результатами исследования с «РБК Крипто».

При расчете учитывались средние показатели за месяц: средний тариф на электроэнергию — 5,7 руб. за 1 кВт·ч, курс BTC — $107 893, курс доллара — 79,53 руб.

rbc.group

Результаты тестирования показали, что все устройства (девять моделей поколения 21 от Bitmain и пять моделей 60/61/50 линеек от MicroBT) имели в июне положительную доходность в диапазоне от 1,48 до 5,8% в месяц, или от 18,03 до 69,6% годовых.

Лидерами по доходности стали:

  • Bitmain Antminer S21+ 235 TH/s — 5,8% в месяц / 69,6% годовых;
  • Bitmain Antminer S21+ 225 TH/s — 5,7% в месяц / 68,4% годовых;
  • Bitmain Antminer S21+ 216 TH/s — 5,5% в месяц / 66,4% годовых.

Максимальную валовую прибыль принес Bitmain Antminer S21 XP 270 TH/s, он добыл за июль 0,00409383 BTC (около 39 тыс. руб.). Но высокая стоимость самого устройства (более 0,5 млн руб.) снизила его рентабельность до 4,2% в месяц / 53% годовых, не позволив ему войти в тройку лидеров по доходности.

Динамика по сравнению с июнем

В июне в тройке лидеров первые два места также занимали устройства от Bitmain: S21+ 235 TH/s (3,93% / 47,21%) и S21+ 225 TH/s (3,88% / 46,53%). На третьем месте находился MicroBT Whatsminer M60S+ 210 TH/s (3,82% / 45,89%), но в рейтинг июля он не попал.

В прошлом месяце был зафиксирован рост показателей доходности и добычи BTC по отношению к июню. Это связано с укреплением курса биткоина в июле при сохранении высокой сложности сети, что позволило компенсировать часть давления на маржинальность, говорится в обзоре.

Сложность майнинга биткоина за июль выросла на 9,11%. В начале месяца она составляла 116,96 Т, а в конце — 127,62 Т, по данным Сloverpool. Такое увеличение сложности снижает доходность добычи криптовалюты, но рост курса биткоина восполнил расходы и привел к росту доходности.

14 июля биткоин впервые превысил $123 тыс. На 13:50 мск 13 августа его цена колеблется около $119 тыс., это всего на 2% ниже максимума.

İlgili Okumalar

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit28 dk önce

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit28 dk önce

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit29 dk önce

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit29 dk önce

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

In Q2 2024, despite a roughly 14.2% decline in Bitcoin's price, many Wall Street institutions increased their crypto holdings, revealing a divergence from ETF flow trends. Overall institutional Bitcoin exposure grew by 7.5% to ~536k BTC, while aggregate spot Bitcoin ETF holdings declined. Notably, exposure concentration increased, with fewer reporting institutions holding larger positions. A key trend was the significant outperformance of Ethereum (ETH) exposure growth over Bitcoin (BTC) among major banks. For instance, JPMorgan's ETH exposure surged 67.3% versus 12.2% for BTC, and Morgan Stanley's ETH exposure grew 18.6% versus 3.7%. Individual bank holdings of Ethereum ETFs like ETHA saw dramatic increases, even as the overall Ethereum ETF market experienced net outflows during the quarter. Trading firms like Jane Street significantly rebuilt its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) position, while several hedge funds, including Brevan Howard and Graham Capital, reduced spot ETF holdings but added substantial option positions (both calls and puts), indicating more complex strategies. Institutions showed diverging views on crypto-related equities: some sold shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR) after its announced Bitcoin sales, while others like Renaissance Technologies and BlackRock were buyers. New entrants like Spain's Santander Bank disclosed initial crypto ETF positions. Meanwhile, long-term holders like Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds paused their accumulation, and Harvard's endowment maintained a flat Bitcoin position. Key signals include the deepening institutionalization of crypto assets, a clear institutional preference for accumulating Ethereum, and growing divergence in views on crypto equities. This institutional buying in Q2 preceded a price recovery and renewed inflows into Ethereum ETFs in July and August.

marsbit47 dk önce

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

marsbit47 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片