【比推每日新闻精选】美CFTC探讨允许注册期货交易平台开展加密货币现货合约交易;美联储戴利:降息时机临近,年内降息次数更有可能大于两次;区块链借贷公司Figure向SEC提交IPO申请,拟今年上市

比推2025-08-04 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-08-04 tarihinde güncellendi

比推小编每日为您精选的Web3新闻:

【美CFTC探讨允许注册期货交易平台开展加密货币现货合约交易】

比推消息,据彭博社报道,美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)正在研究如何允许部分注册期货交易平台上市杠杆型数字资产,如比特币和以太坊。

CFTC 代理主席 Caroline Pham 表示,CFTC 现在可以采取一个明确且简单的解决方案。她提到自己今年 3 月发表的一篇专栏文章,曾建议该机构可以行使其豁免权,允许部分企业不受当前法规限制——这些法规目前仅允许期货交易平台上市衍生品产品。

CFTC 现已就在注册期货交易平台上市的加密资产现货合约交易向公众征求意见,截止日期为 8 月 18 日。

美联储戴利:降息时机临近,年内降息次数更有可能大于两次】

比推消息,旧金山联储主席戴利表示,鉴于越来越多的证据表明就业市场正在疲软,且没有迹象显示关税通胀持续存在,降息时机已经临近。

戴利在谈到美联储上周决定时表示,“我愿意再等一个周期,但我不能永远等下去。”虽然这并不意味着9月降息已成定局,但她说:“我会倾向于认为,今后每次会议都是思考政策调整的即时会议。”

戴利称,年内进行两次25个基点的降息看起来仍然是一个适当的重新调整,重要的是是否在9月和12月都降息,而不是降息是否会发生。戴利说,“如果通胀回升并蔓延,或者劳动力市场回暖,降息当然可以少于两次,但更有可能的是不得不进行两次以上的降息。如果劳动力市场看起来正进入疲软阶段而我们未看到通胀外溢的影响,应该做好进行更多降息的准备。”

【区块链借贷公司FigureSEC提交IPO申请,拟今年上市】

比推消息,区块链借贷公司 Figure Technology Solutions 周一宣布,已向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交了保密的IPO(首次公开募股)申请文件,计划于今年晚些时候上市。

Figure公司在现实世界资产(RWA)领域是先行者,已通过其Provenance区块链累计发放了超过160亿美元的房屋净值信贷额度。上月,该公司还宣布与Figure Markets合并,后者是一家由Figure创始人Mike Cagney创立的区块链市场,并发行收益型稳定币。

Figure的举动呼应了加密行业的最新趋势。在加密货币和股票市场持续繁荣的背景下,越来越多的数字资产公司寻求上市。此前,稳定币发行商 Circle 上市首日股价飙升,托管公司 BitGo、资产管理公司 Grayscale 以及交易平台 Bullish 也都已提交了IPO申请。

Barry Silbert重返 Grayscale 任董事长,将推动公司 IPO 计划】

比推消息,Grayscale同步引入四名传统金融高管:前Bridgewater高管Diana Zhang任COO、Apollo前高管Ramona Boston任CMO、Goldman Sachs前高管Andrea Williams任CCO、Citadel前高管Maxwell Rosenthal任CHRO。

【观点:“加密IPO季”即将到来,资金或将流入原生加密项目】

比推消息,据福布斯报道,Circle 的成功 IPO 正在鼓舞其他加密货币公司探索上市,因为购买一家上市公司的股票远比一参与 Curve Finance 流动性池或试图预测哪种 Memecoin 未来会涨 100 倍要轻松得多,分析认为“加密 IPO 季”即将到来。虽然有批评人士担心加密货币 IPO 热潮可能会扼杀山寨币市场,但那些认为加密货币 IPO 将取代山寨币项目的人只看到了一半的前景。这些股票上市对山寨币来说无疑是利好消息,因为它们标志着加密货币已被广泛接受,成为金融生态系统中合法的组成部分。

Coinbase首席执行官:美国政府将持有超过6000亿美元的比特币储备】

比推消息,Coinbase首席执行官布莱恩·阿姆斯特朗(Brian Armstrong)在一次行业会议中表示,美国政府最终将持有超过6000亿美元的比特币储备,这一言论是在他对加密货币未来趋势的预测中提出的。虽然美国政府此前已通过扣押和出售等方式持有少量比特币,但此番预测暗示,随着比特币在全球金融体系中地位的提升,美国政府未来可能会以更积极的方式将比特币纳入其储备资产。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

İlgili Okumalar

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit9 dk önce

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbit9 dk önce

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

"Standing in the Light: Understanding the Optical Module and CPO Industry Chain" This article analyzes the critical role of optical communication technology, specifically optical modules and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), as the "nervous system" for modern AI data centers. With exponential growth in AI computational demands (e.g., NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture), traditional electrical interconnects using copper cables face severe bottlenecks in bandwidth, power consumption, and signal integrity over distance. The core function of an optical module is to act as a "translator," converting electrical signals from chips into optical signals for transmission over fiber (and vice-versa). Key internal components include lasers, modulators, photodetectors, drivers, and DSP chips. The industry is currently transitioning from 800G to 1.6T modules. However, the future lies in CPO. This next-generation technology integrates the optical engine directly with the switch ASIC/XPU on the same package substrate, drastically reducing power consumption (by ~3.5x according to NVIDIA), overcoming bandwidth density limits, and minimizing signal attenuation compared to traditional pluggable modules. Key challenges for CPO include advanced packaging capacity (dominated by TSMC), thermal management, repairability, and standardization. The article details the broader technology landscape, including Near-Packaged Optics (NPO, a pragmatic intermediate step), Linear-drive Pluggable Optics (LPO), Optical I/O (OIO for chip-level integration), and Optical Circuit Switches (OCS). A comprehensive CPO industry chain is mapped, highlighting shifting power dynamics: * **Architecture Definers:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell now hold greater influence. * **Advanced Packaging & Manufacturing:** TSMC is central; Fabrinet is a key EMS player. * **Lasers ("The Heart"):** A strategic bottleneck. EML lasers are led by Lumentum and Coherent (both receiving major NVIDIA investments). CW lasers, favored for CPO/silicon photonics, see strong Chinese players like Source Photonics and Sicoya. * **Silicon Photonics Chips:** The mainstream path for CPO engines, with key players like Broadcom, Intel, Marvell, and China's Accelink. * **Fiber Connectivity Components:** A major new, high-growth market created by CPO, including Fiber Array Units (FAU), Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF), and MPO connectors. Companies like Tianfu Communication and US Conec are leaders. * **Fiber & Cable:** Experiencing a super-cycle (e.g., Corning, Yangtze Optical Fiber). * **PCB/Substrates:** Requiring advanced materials (e.g., Shengyi Tech). * **DSP & SerDes:** Functions are integrated into switch ASICs in the CPO era (e.g., Broadcom, Astera Labs). * **Optical Module Makers:** Transitioning from standalone module suppliers to providers of optical engines and NPO/LPO solutions while riding the current pluggable boom (e.g., Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink). The investment timeline is segmented: Short-term (2026-2027) features the "last feast" for pluggable modules and CPO's initial rollout. Medium-term (2027-2029) will see CPO expand and NPO peak. Long-term (2029-2032+) involves CPO/OIO penetration into intra-rack scaling. In conclusion, optical interconnects are fundamental to AI infrastructure. The competitive landscape sees US firms leading in architecture and high-end chips, TSMC in advanced packaging, and Chinese firms holding strong positions in modules, connectivity components, CW lasers, and fiber/cable. The future belongs to companies that can navigate the technological shift from "selling shovels" (modules) to "building highways" (CPO/OIO infrastructure).

marsbit19 dk önce

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

marsbit19 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片