标普500调整大幕已拉开,盯紧关键点位

比推2025-08-04 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-08-04 tarihinde güncellendi

一、一周行情回顾:(07.28~08.01)

周一开盘价6397.69点,周四创出最高价6427.02点,周五触及最低价6212.69点,最终收盘价6238.01点,周振幅214.33点,跌幅2.36%,周线收出一根阴K线,收盘价收在5周均线之下,继续创出标普500指数的历史新高。

标普500指数周K线图:(动能量化模型*情绪量化模型)

image.png

(图一)

标普500指数日K线图:

image.png

(图二)

标普500指数周线图:(历史数据回测)

image.png

(图三)

自4月7日反弹以来,指数已经连续上涨17周,共计81个交易日,累计最大涨幅达到32.92%。本周指数跌幅2.36%,周线收出一根中阴K线。

笔者上周文章的题目是《标普500上涨进入高风险区,短期谨防剧烈震荡》,在文章中运用多周期量化模型指标以及十几年历史数据回测,并结合当前宏观经济层面对金融市场的影响,提示下周指数还会创出新高,但由于指数处于技术超买+上涨时间周期末端,提醒投资者切勿被强势表象所迷惑,行情已进入高风险区;预测下周行情维持高位震荡结构,留意盘中剧烈波动,谨防单日大阴线快速杀跌。

从本周走势来看,周一小幅震荡,日线收出十字星;接下来两天连续收出阴线,跌幅不大;周四股价大幅高开并创出历史新高6427.02点后,开始缓慢下跌,收出一根高开低走的阴线,成交量明显放大,震荡幅度加大;周五股价跳空低开后持续下跌,当日收出一根低开低走的中阴线,日线留下跳空缺口。本周指数走势与笔者预测基本相符。

接下来,笔者从多维度层面分析当前指数所发生的变化:

(一)、量化模型信号分析:

1、周线视角(见图一):

①、动能量化模型:持续发出高位钝化信号,动能1号线运行方向从向上转为走平状态,能量柱与上周相比开始缩短。

②、情绪量化模型,指标仍然在处在高位,但是与上周相比减少。情绪1强度是0.54(取值范围0~10)左右,情绪2强度是1.99左右。

③、数字监测模型:上周收盘价是6388.64点,监测信号显示数字D(取值A~E),本周信号消失。如果接下来每周的收盘价均小于6388.64点,预示数字D见顶信号有效。震荡值0.73(取值范围0~1)。

④、顶峰信号:数值是4.65,指数仍在高风险区域。

2、日线视角(见图二):

①、动能量化模型:处在高位顶背离状态,周二动能1号线高位死叉动能2号线开始向下运行,两条信号线由粘合转为向下张口,能量(绿)柱逐步放大,预示做空力量加强。

②、情绪量化模型:指标脱离高位区,开始减小。

③、数字监控模型:周二监测信号显示高位数字9,随后三天信号消失,预示日线级别见顶(以收盘价为标准)信号有效。

④、顶峰信号:数值从周二最高值8.49降到周五2.13,说明指数开始调整。

⑤、量能方面:本周后两天成交量明显放大,呈现放量下跌状态,初现调整特征。

(二)、趋势时序与历史数据回测分析(图三):

①、回测数据区间:2009年3月6日2025年4月4日,共计840根周K线。

②、设定调整规则是:回调≤2周且跌幅≥5%,或者回调≥3周,回测数据中符合条件的调整共有52次。

③、统计历史数据寻找规律:每当指数从低点连续上涨16周后,出现调整的概率高达81%左右,并且出现大幅调整的概率较大。

④、从4月7日到7月25日,指数已经连续上涨16周时间,本周是第17周。指数在本周如期出现明显调整,静观行情后续走势。

二、下周行情预测:

1、笔者认为下周指数还会向下调整,重要支撑位在6147点附近,一次有效跌破的概率不大;指数调整到此处会有反弹,第一压力位在6300点附近,重要压力位在6247点附近。

2、指数盘中出现拉升时,借机调整仓位,切勿盲目追高,警惕指数形成二次顶的风险。

3、提醒投资者密切关注市场消息面的变化,关注大市值权重股的异动。

三、下周操作策略:

1、下周重点关注6147点的得失。若支撑有效,继续维持高位宽幅震荡;若有效跌破,则调整幅度加大,注意下跌风险。

1、中线仓位:笔者连续提示投资者,将21日均线作为止盈位。目前指数已经跌破,建议中线仓位减少到原有仓位的30%。个股亦可参照操作。

2、短线仓位:按照笔者给出的关键点位,设置好止损点,小仓位逢低做多,逢高做空。个股亦可参照操作

3、如果想得到更加精确的操作,可以把分析周期切换到小周期,例如60分钟或者120分钟周期。

以上各种模型是本人操作时遵守的交易规则,不构成任何买卖依据。个人观点,仅作参考。

作者:Cody Feng


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

İlgili Okumalar

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbit18 dk önce

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbit18 dk önce

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit33 dk önce

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit33 dk önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit1 saat önce

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片