Kraken IPO前哨战:从私募股权到 Ink 生态的财富链

比推2025-07-31 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-07-31 tarihinde güncellendi

作者:kkk,BlockBeats

原标题:Kraken 即将 IPO,有哪些标的可以炒作


7 月 30 日,加密交易平台 Kraken 传出正以 150 亿美元估值寻求筹集约 5 亿美元融资的消息,引发市场高度关注。这一消息恰逢美国监管环境逐步转暖:2025 年 3 月,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)正式撤销对 Kraken 的证券违规指控,而就在上周,《财富》杂志披露 FBI 也已结束对 Kraken 创始人的相关调查,Kraken 由此摆脱多重监管阴影。与此同时,Kraken 官方社交媒体频频暗示潜在的上市计划,进一步激发市场想象。

此前 CRCL 在 6 月完成 IPO 后最高涨幅一度高达 10 倍,为市场预期提供了强烈对照。若 Kraken 成功上市,或将再掀一轮情绪高潮——值得关注的是:哪些标的将成为这场盛宴中的「炒作先锋」?

Pre-IPO 投资热潮来袭,散户也能抢跑上市前

随着 OpenAI、SpaceX 等顶级公司长期维持私有化,大量原始员工和早期投资者希望在上市前提前变现手中股权。而 Forge 正是连接这些「想卖」的人和「想提前买」的投资者的交易市场。如今 Kraken 的上市预期被炒热,若其员工或机构开始抛售股权,Forge 等私募股权交易平台可能成为散户押注的间接入口。

在 Forge 平台上,投资者通常可以通过两种方式购买未上市公司的股份:第一种是直接交易,即你找到某位愿意出售 Kraken 股权的持有者,与之协商价格。Forge 会协助完成 KYC、尽调与合约签署流程。第二种是通过 SPV 交易(Forge Funds),Forge 会设立专门的特殊目的实体(SPV),汇集买家资金后统一购买目标公司股权。你所持有的是 SPV 的份额,而非公司股票本身。这种方式绕开 ROFR,更适合想快速入场的投资者,甚至可在几天内完成交易。等 Kraken 真正 IPO 后,SPV 也有望获得流动性兑现。

目前 Forge 平台上的价格为 36.13 美元,一年内涨幅高达 200%,体现了市场对 Kraken 上市预期的热情。估值约为 100 亿美元,如果 Kraken 能够顺利以 150 亿美元估值上市,当前入场者或将获得超过 50% 的超额收益。

此外,私募股权的代币化也正在给散户带来全新的投资机会,包括 Republic、Robinhood 等平台已支持 OpenAI、SpaceX 等科技公司,未来是否也将支持 Kraken,同样值得持续关注。

对标 Coinbase 的 Base 链,Ink 成为下一轮 L2 叙事核心

继 Coinbase 推出的 Base 链成为 Layer 2 板块的流量中枢后,Kraken 也正式入局,以 Ink 网络 打响了其 Layer 2 战略的第一枪。Ink 是一条基于以太坊 OP Stack 构建的 Layer 2 区块链,主打高速吞吐、低延迟和对以太坊虚拟机(EVM)的原生兼容,旨在成为 Superchain 上的 DeFi 中枢,为未来的交易、支付及链上金融基础设施提供坚实的底层支撑。该网络由 Kraken 牵头推动,其原生代币 $INK 将由子公司 Ink 基金会发行,并通过 Kraken 交易平台的空投计划分发给符合条件的活跃用户与生态参与者。尽管目前尚未公布具体的分发标准与时间表,但这一消息已成为市场的焦点。

6 月 17 日,Ink 基金会宣布 $INK 总量将永久封顶为 10 亿枚,无增发、无治理权,仅用于生态激励与用户层使用,定位更接近于「燃料」属性,而非传统的治理代币。首个明确的应用场景是由 Aave 驱动的原生流动性协议,这是 Ink 推进 onchain capital stack 的关键一环。该协议将借贷机制原生集成至 Ink 链上,为用户提供高效便捷的链上资金调度服务。

Kraken 联合 CEO Arjun Sethi 表示,Ink 的使命是将「生产级的链上系统」深度整合至 Kraken 产品体系中,推动中心化平台向链上金融体系的战略性迁移。而 Ink 基金会董事会则将此称为「一个关键时刻」,认为 Ink 的启动标志着 CeFi 与 DeFi 开始融合,也是全球统一资本市场愿景迈出的实质一步。

随着主网已正式上线,Ink 的生态初具雏形。平台已开放 memecoin 发射工具 Inkypump,首个吉祥物代币 $ANITA 曾一度冲上 800 万美元市值,目前稳定在 400 万美元附近。虽然 $INK 的 TGE 尚未公布,但在 Base 等 L2 项目的成功案例刺激下,市场对 Ink 的潜力已有强烈预期。

参考 Base 链在生态活跃度、TVL、项目数量上的快速爬升以及 $VIRTUAL、$ZORA 等围绕其构建的生态代币表现,具备 Kraken 团队直接背书、且将自带流量和资源倾斜的 Ink,无疑具备成为下一条热门 L2 主线的可能。可以预期的是,未来一旦 $INK 启动流通并开放交易,势必将成为 CeFi 炒作叙事下的「正统」代表之一,尤其是在 Kraken 有意将其交易能力与链上场景深度绑定的背景下,Ink 不仅是一个 L2,更可能成为 Kraken 的 onchain 战略核心。对于想要提前卡位 Kraken IPO 与下一轮 L2 热点的投资者来说,Ink 与其生态标的值得重点关注。

总结

除了加密交易和 Layer 2 网络建设,Kraken 近来也在积极拓展更广泛的金融版图。2025 年,Kraken 以 15 亿美元重金收购美国领先的零售期货交易平台 Ninja Trader,拿下期货佣金商资格,正式挺进受 CFTC 监管的衍生品市场,打通 CeFi 与 TradFi 之间的关键通道。与此同时,Kraken 还推出支付应用 Krak,支持 300 多种加密与法币资产的即时报酬转账,未来更将扩展至借贷和信用卡服务,打造全方位加密支付体验。这一系列布局不仅为 Kraken 打造超级金融平台奠定基础,也被视为其酝酿多年的 IPO 计划的重要前奏。随着产品线扩张、营收增长和监管环境持续改善,Kraken 距离正式上市的步伐,正在日益加快。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

İlgili Okumalar

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News16 dk önce

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News16 dk önce

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit26 dk önce

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit26 dk önce

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片