加密风投370亿美元新高背后：为何融资仍难？

比推2025-07-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-07-11 tarihinde güncellendi

作者：Mason Nystrom

编译：深潮TechFlow

原标题：加密风投 2025：融资难背后的新趋势

为创始人提供有关加密货币融资现状的一些见解，以及我个人对加密货币 VC 未来的一些预测。

话说在前：融资环境艰难，因为上游DPI（深潮注：按市值加权的指数，用于追踪去中心化金融(DeFi)资产在加密货币市场中的表现）和LP的资金挑战，纵观整个 VC 领域，基金在相同时间段内向LP返还的资金与以往相比有所减少。

这反过来导致现有和新创VC获得的净资本减少，最终导致创始人的融资环境更加艰难。

这对加密企业意味着什么？

2025 年交易放缓，但与 2024 年的资本部署步伐相匹配。

- 交易数量放缓可能与许多 VC 接近基金末期，可供部署的资金较少有关。

- 一些大型交易仍由大型基金完成，因此资本部署速度与前两年持平。

过去两年，加密货币并购交易持续改善，这预示着流动性和退出机会的良好发展。近期发生的包括 NinjaTrader、Privy、Bridge、Deribit、HiddenRoaad 等在内的大型并购交易，预示着整合和承销更多加密股权风险投资的好兆头。

过去一年，交易数量相对稳定，2024年第四季度和2025年第一季度有一些规模较大、处于后期阶段的交易完成（或宣布）。

这主要是因为更多交易属于早期的Pre-seed、种子轮和加速器阶段，这些阶段的资金总是比较充裕。

加速器和 Launchpad 引领各阶段交易数量

自 2024 年以来，市场上出现了大量的加速器和 Launchpad 平台，这可能反映了更为严峻的资本环境以及创始人选择更早地推出代币。

早期阶段交易规模中位数回升

Pre-seed融资规模持续同比增长，表明市场在早期阶段仍拥有充足的资金。种子轮、A轮和B轮融资中位数已接近或回升至2022年的水平。

加密VC未来阶段预测

1：代币将成为主要投资机制

从代币和股权的双重结构转向单一资产增值的统一结构。一种资产，一个价值增值的故事。

原推文链接：点击此处

2：金融科技与加密VC的融合

每一位金融科技投资者都在转型成为加密货币投资者，因为他们希望投资于下一代支付网络、新型银行和代币化平台，而这些都建立在加密货币轨道之上。

加密 VC 的竞争即将到来，许多尚未投资稳定币/支付领域的加密 VC 将难以与经验丰富的金融科技VC竞争。

3：流动性风险投资的兴起

“流动性风险投资” ——流动性代币市场中的风险投资机会。

流动性——公共资产/代币的流动性意味着更快的流动性。

可访问性——在私人风险投资中，获得准入并不容易，而流动性风险投资意味着投资者并不总是需要赢得交易，他们可以直接购买资产。场外交易期权也可用。

仓位调整——由于公司更早发行代币，这意味着小型基金仍然可以建立有意义的仓位，大型基金也可以类似地部署到市值更大的流动性资产中。

资金配置——许多表现最佳的 VC 历史上都将其风险资金持有为 BTC 和 ETH 等代币，这些代币已产生超额回报。我个人认为，在熊市周期中，VC 提前调用更多资金，这种情况将变得更加正常。

加密货币将继续引领 VC 的前沿

公私资本市场的融合是风险投资的发展方向，随着企业推迟上市，更多传统 VC 选择在流动性市场（IPO后持有工具）或二级市场进行投资。加密货币正处于风险投资的前沿。

加密货币持续在新的资本市场形成方面进行创新。而且，随着越来越多的资产转移到链上，更多公司将着眼于链上优先的资本形成。

最后，加密货币的收益往往比传统风险投资更具幂律性（深潮注：在幂律分布中，大部分事件的发生概率很小，而极少数事件的发生概率很大。），顶级加密资产竞相成为主权数字货币和新金融经济的底层。这种分散性将更大，但加密货币的超幂律和波动性将继续推动资本进入加密货币风险投资领域，寻求非对称回报。

原文链接:https://www.techflowpost.com/article/detail_26941.html

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点，不构成投资建议

融资

İlgili Okumalar

Precious Metals Decline Alongside, What Signal is Gold Sending to the Market?

Gold and silver prices have declined recently, moving in tandem with a sell-off in risk assets like South Korean semiconductor stocks. This is unusual, as gold typically rises when equities fall due to its safe-haven status. The synchronized drop signals a shift in market focus: it's not about finding safety, but about the rising cost of holding assets that do not yield interest. This cost is the real interest rate. The key driver is a change in Federal Reserve policy expectations under new Chair Kevin Warsh. Despite holding rates steady, the Fed's rhetoric has turned more hawkish, emphasizing persistent inflation risks. This has led markets to price in a "higher for longer" rate environment, increasing the appeal of cash and bonds while pressuring zero-yield assets like gold and tech stocks with high future cash flow valuations. Technically, gold breached the $4,100/oz support level, approaching the critical $4,000 psychological and technical zone. A break below could trigger accelerated selling from momentum traders and ETFs. While long-term supportive factors like central bank buying and geopolitical risks remain, short-term price action is dominated by liquidity and opportunity cost dynamics. The South Korean market meltdown, driven by crowded AI-trade unwinding, is a symptom—not the cause—of this broader macro repricing. Both markets are reacting to the same pressures: higher real rates and a stronger US dollar. In summary, the concurrent decline in equities and precious metals highlights that diverse assets can share exposure to a common macro variable—the price of money. The near-term path for gold and silver depends primarily on the persistence of Fed hawkishness, dollar strength, and real yields, which currently override their traditional safe-haven narratives.

marsbit4 dk önce

Precious Metals Decline Alongside, What Signal is Gold Sending to the Market?

marsbit4 dk önce

Chip Stocks Lead U.S. Market Decline: Is AI Trading Being Hit by Both Interest Rates and Returns?

Chip stocks led a broad decline in US markets, with the Nasdaq dropping 2.2% and the S&P 500 falling 1.4%. This selloff reflects a dual challenge for the once-high-flying AI hardware trade: rising interest rate expectations and growing investor impatience for clear returns from massive AI capital expenditures. The pressure was most acute on hardware leaders. Nvidia fell about 4%, dipping below a $5 trillion market cap, while Micron plunged 13.2% ahead of its earnings report. Declines across memory, storage, AI, and mobile chips indicated a sector-wide retreat. The selloff spread globally, with South Korea's KOSPI index dropping nearly 10% as key suppliers SK Hynix and Samsung recorded double-digit losses. Investors appeared to be taking profits from the most crowded trades first. Macro headwinds intensified as market expectations shifted toward a more aggressive Federal Reserve. Forecasts for multiple rate hikes in 2026 pressured high-valuation tech stocks, which rely on long-term growth projections that become less attractive as discount rates rise. Concurrently, investors are scrutinizing the profit potential of the immense AI spending by cloud giants like Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta. While these expenditures drive demand for chips and hardware, the market is now questioning whether AI services will generate sufficient returns to justify the ongoing costs. This adjustment is not necessarily a bubble burst but a recalibration. AI demand fundamentals remain, but the narrative of endless growth can no longer fully offset concerns over higher interest rates and a longer path to profitability. Near-term direction may hinge on Micron's upcoming earnings guidance and incoming inflation data, which will influence both the AI demand outlook and the Fed's policy path. The market is transitioning from blindly buying growth to demanding clearer visibility on returns.

marsbit1 saat önce

Chip Stocks Lead U.S. Market Decline: Is AI Trading Being Hit by Both Interest Rates and Returns?

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenAI's New Paper: How to Train an AI that "Doesn't Deteriorate Under Pressure"?

OpenAI's new paper "Reinforcement Learning Towards Broadly and Persistently Beneficial Models" explores training AI to maintain safe, helpful, and honest behavior even under pressure, in unseen scenarios, or after being fine-tuned for harmful purposes. Moving beyond simple rule-based "don'ts," the research focuses on cultivating "beneficial traits" like honesty, risk-awareness, corrigibility, and transparency. It investigates if reinforcement learning (RL), often prone to "reward hacking" where models exploit loopholes, can instead be used to instill robust, generalized positive behaviors. Researchers created a multi-domain synthetic dialogue dataset covering areas like healthcare and law. They trained a model by replacing 5% of standard RL data with "beneficial trait" data. This model outperformed the baseline in 83% of 53 evaluations, showing average gains of 9.1% in alignment, safety, and helpfulness. Crucially, improvements generalized: a model trained only on healthcare "good behavior" data also performed better in 17 out of 19 non-healthcare alignment tests. The paper also tests "alignment persistence." When subjected to adversarial prompts or harmful fine-tuning, the beneficial trait model showed greater resilience, with smaller performance drops and less "spillover" of bad behavior to unrelated tasks. While not a complete solution, this work suggests a shift from post-hoc correction to proactively shaping robust, principled AI behavior, a critical step for deploying models in high-stakes, complex decision-making scenarios.

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenAI's New Paper: How to Train an AI that "Doesn't Deteriorate Under Pressure"?

marsbit1 saat önce

Goldman Sachs Revisits the State of the AI Boom: Strong Earnings Will Override Valuation Concerns Until the Investment Cycle Peaks, Volatility to Rise Further

Goldman Sachs discusses the current AI investment boom, arguing it is not a simple repeat of the 1999-2000 bubble. Unlike the dot-com era, current valuations are not wildly out of control because earnings expectations are rising in tandem with stock prices. The key issue is that market prices have already priced in substantial optimism, making them sensitive to any narrative shifts. The core risk has shifted from "valuation bubble" to "earnings bubble." While strong profits from companies in semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, and data centers currently outweigh valuation concerns, this is dependent on the ongoing capital expenditure cycle. The true test will be whether these robust earnings can be sustained after the investment cycle peaks. Current market prices imply optimistic assumptions, such as faster AI adoption, higher productivity gains, and a larger share of economic profits going to capital owners. The AI boom may also be masking relative weakness in the non-AI sectors of the economy. As a result, market volatility is expected to rise. Goldman recommends that investors consider maintaining exposure while adding downside protection, such as put options, to manage potential drawdowns.

marsbit1 saat önce

Goldman Sachs Revisits the State of the AI Boom: Strong Earnings Will Override Valuation Concerns Until the Investment Cycle Peaks, Volatility to Rise Further

marsbit1 saat önce

Zuckerberg Enters the Prediction Market

Mark Zuckerberg's Meta has entered the predictive markets arena with a new app called "Arena." Currently in an early experimental phase, Arena will initially operate as a standalone app using a points-based system where users can predict outcomes on politics, sports, and world events without real money. Meta plans to leverage its vast daily active user base for growth. The move comes as the predictive market industry sees explosive growth, with platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi handling hundreds of billions in volume. While a points system avoids initial regulatory hurdles, Meta hasn't ruled out introducing real-money betting later. The strategy aligns with Meta's pattern of adopting popular trends, though challenges remain, including regulatory scrutiny and the historically mixed success of its standalone apps.

Foresight News1 saat önce

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures