Bombie Down 90% Ahead of Token Burn, Hopeful Players Stake $4M in Sequel Game

ccn.com2025-07-10 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-07-10 tarihinde güncellendi

Key Takeaways
  • The BOMB token is down 90% since its launch in mid-June.
  • Over 50% of BOMB’s market cap is locked up in Capybobo staking.
  • Capybobo is promising a Q3 2025 airdrop to its 700,000 monthly players.

Bombie’s troubled airdrop has shredded investor and player confidence. The token has officially lost over 90% of its value since launching a month ago.

Now, over $4 million in BOMB tokens are locked up in the game’s sequel, which also promises an airdrop for the most dedicated of players who stake their BOMB tokens in-game.

Bombie Burns

As per the latest update from Bombie, players have until July 17, 2025, 10:00 UTC to claim their airdrop tokens before they are all burned.

The news comes in tandem with a staking update , which reveals that 5.07 billion BOMB tokens worth roughly $4.05 million are currently staked in the Bombie ‘sequel’, Capybobo (formerly CapyBomb).

In hopes of restoring player faith and rebuilding its reputation, Bombie has committed to “relaunching” the Bombie token/brand.

So far, this appears to be coming in the form of token burns and heightened transparency, as well as giveaways for BOMB stakers in the form of Tether (USDT).

It’s seen as a paltry offering to paying players who recorded over 90% in losses and spent 11 months playing the game.

Many are still calling for Bombie Foundation frontman, COO Barry Lau, to be investigated by authorities for what many believe was a massive fraud on his part.

BOMB Token Bombs

According to data on CoinMarketCap, the BOMB token is trading down 90% at a meager $0.0007955 since launching a month ago.

Initially, the token launched around the $0.004 mark, but a catastrophic airdrop rollout wrecked player and investor trust, which spurred a mass exodus of players and investors.

BOMB now carries a market cap of $7.14 million, half staked in Capybobo. At present, Capybobo is drawing just over 773,000 monthly users,

For now, Capybobo continues to launch new features and updates. But really, all eyes are on the airdrop promised.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

İlgili Okumalar

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

**Title: Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: "Smart Money" Stumbles on the Pitch as "Buying No" Outperforms "Buying Yes"** An analysis of pre-match trades over $5,000 on Polymarket for 20 completed group stage matches reveals a counterintuitive finding: large "smart money" bets were not consistently accurate. Aggregated pre-match buying volume was $89.55 million, with a weighted hit rate of only 48.5%. Holding these positions would have resulted in an estimated net loss of about $1.76 million (ROI -2.0%), challenging the notion that big money reliably predicts outcomes. The data highlights several key dynamics. Draws proved to be a major risk, significantly impacting bets on favored teams, as seen in Belgium-Egypt and Spain-Cape Verde. Markets were more efficient for clear mismatches (e.g., Germany's big win) but became prone to bias when favorites were overvalued. Notably, buying "No" shares (betting against a specific outcome) significantly outperformed buying "Yes," with hit rates of 62.4% vs. 37.5%. This suggests the market often overprices popular narratives, creating value in contrarian positions. Individual trades showed extreme volatility. One wallet (mintblade) earned an estimated $6.77 million by betting against Iran, while another (LEEEROYJENKINS) lost roughly $8.39 million on a Belgium win. The market favors high-risk, high-reward information trading rather than steady arbitrage. For sustained insight, wallets with consistent performance across multiple matches (e.g., swisstony) are more telling than one-off big bets. Ultimately, the Polymarket acts less as a crystal ball and more as a mirror, reflecting crowd bias and the inherent unpredictability of football. True "smart money" may lie not in predicting the future, but in identifying and exploiting market mispricings while respecting risk.

marsbit22 dk önce

Unveiling the Whales of the World Cup Prediction Market: Smart Money Stumbles on the Pitch, 'Buy No' Outperforms 'Buy Yes'

marsbit22 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

Jeff Bezos Returns as CEO for Third Venture, Still Can't Avoid Musk After stepping down as Amazon CEO in 2021, Jeff Bezos has returned to the front lines as co-CEO of Prometheus, an AI startup he founded. In a recent CNBC interview, Bezos described the experience as "Type 2 fun"—exhausting but ultimately rewarding. Founded less than a year ago, Prometheus has already raised over $18 billion in two funding rounds, achieving a staggering $41 billion valuation. Prometheus aims to develop a "General Engineer AI" to accelerate the entire "invention loop"—design, simulation, testing, and manufacturing—for complex physical products like jet engines, spacecraft, and medical devices. This positions the company at the intersection of Bezos's past experiences: Amazon's platform-building scale and Blue Origin's rigorous physical engineering. This marks Bezos's third major venture, following Amazon and Blue Origin. His co-CEO is Vik Bajaj, bringing expertise from life sciences and hard tech. Bezos now dedicates most of his time to Prometheus, signaling his belief in its transformative potential. The move also comes as Bezos's space company, Blue Origin, faces challenges, including a recent test explosion delaying its New Glenn rocket. Meanwhile, Elon Musk's SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO, surpassing Amazon's market cap. While Musk focuses on AI for executing physical tasks (like Tesla's robots and SpaceX's engineering), Bezos is betting on AI to *invent* in the physical world. Prometheus enters a crowded industrial AI field with players like OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Tesla's Optimus. Its lofty valuation bets on the unproven but massive opportunity to become the foundational platform for engineering in the AI era—a "blue ocean" Bezos hopes to define before Musk does.

marsbit25 dk önce

Bezos' Third Startup Still Can't Avoid Musk

marsbit25 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

The article analyzes a popular theory circulating online that the U.S. stock market may be mathematically incapable of a true, sustained decline due to the country's massive and growing national debt. The argument suggests that the government's only path to managing this debt is through inflation and money printing, which would nominally lift asset prices like stocks, creating a perpetual "melt-up." The author places this idea within the historical context of market melt-ups, such as the dot-com bubble and Japan's asset bubble, where prices detach from fundamentals driven by momentum and FOMO. While acknowledging that a high-debt environment creates incentives for inflation, which is generally favorable for assets over cash, the article refutes key claims of the online theory. It clarifies that interest payments are not about to exceed GDP, that printing money is not the only option for the government, and that stocks do not reliably rise in lockstep with hyperinflation, citing historical examples from Germany, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela. The more probable outcome, according to the author, is a prolonged period of financial repression—moderate inflation above interest rates that slowly erodes debt and cash purchasing power, leading to nominally higher asset prices but potentially lower real returns. The core warning is that while long-term market trends may be upward, this does not eliminate the risk of significant interim crashes (30%, 40%, or more) or guarantee real wealth creation during inflationary times. The conclusion advises against betting one's entire financial future on a smooth, perpetually rising market narrative. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, diversified strategy involving productive assets (stocks, real estate, some gold, short-term bonds) and an adequate cash buffer to avoid forced selling during downturns. The key takeaway is to avoid extreme concentration in expensive assets and leverage, and not to base investment decisions on the hope that every market dip will inevitably be rescued.

marsbit45 dk önce

Won't US Stocks Ever Fall Again? The 'Great Melt-up' Trap in the Era of High Debt

marsbit45 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片