Crypto Industry Leaders Raise Concerns Over CLARITY Act’s ‘Gensler-Era’ Amendment Ahead Of Markup

bitcoinist2025-06-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-06-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Crypto industry players are reportedly concerned about a new section added to the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Crypto industry players are reportedly concerned about a new section added to the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of 2025 ahead of today’s legislative process, which seems to resemble the regulatory approach of the previous administration.

Crypto Industry Players Raise The Alarm

On Tuesday, crypto industry players were reportedly concerned over a new section in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 ahead of today’s markup. Journalist Eleanor Terret revealed that some industry leaders raised the alarm over the legislation’s amended text, which has been allegedly described as a “Gensler-era provision.”

The legislation, introduced on May 29 by Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee French Hill, seeks to establish a regulatory framework for crypto assets in the US and provide the long-awaited clarity and protection for the industry.

The bipartisan bill aims to protect consumers by requiring developers and customer-facing firms to provide crucial disclosures to their clients and keep the companies’ funds separate from those of their customers.

Moreover, the CLARITY Act also seeks to facilitate the growth of crypto projects by providing developers with a clear pathway to secure funding under the oversight of the US watchdog.

“Our bill brings long-overdue clarity to the digital asset ecosystem, prioritizes consumer protection and American innovation, and builds off our work in the 118th Congress,” Hill stated last month.

However, Terret reported that the new amendment would “eliminate exemptions for previously issued tokens,” giving the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) “weeping authority to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether each token qualifies as a security.”

According to the post, critics consider that the change would reintroduce the “uncertainty the bill is meant to resolve.” Meanwhile, some crypto community investors also expressed concern about the provision news, suggesting that the change could allow a game of “winners and losers again.”

It’s worth noting that the CLARITY Act has been heavily criticized by Democrats, with some suggesting that the bill could allow US President Donald Trump to “cash in” on its crypto ventures.

Democratic Representative Maxine Waters expressed her concerns last week, affirming that “this rushed, overly complicated bill will increase investor harm, which already runs rampant in today’s crypto market.”

She argued that “Some of the riskiest activities are broadly exempted from the bill, leaving our constituents with no one to turn to when their money vanishes. The bill puts our national security at risk and contains no penalties for crypto criminals.”

CLARITY Act Momentum Continues

Notably, crypto industry players and US lawmakers pushed for the inclusion of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) in the market structure legislation, seeking to offer a safe harbor for software developers and infrastructure providers.

As reported by Bitcoinist, eight crypto policy organizations urged US Congress leaders to include the BRCA, first introduced in 2023, in the CLARITY Act in a joint statement last week. The bill was reintroduced by Republican Representative Tom Emmer on May 21, 2025, with Democratic Representative Ritchie Torres as a co-sponsor.

On June 8, the amended version of the Clarity Act included clarity for non-custodial developers by adding the BRCA to the bill. In a joint statement on Monday, the crypto groups advocating for the inclusion stated:

This is a meaningful step toward protecting developers of non-custodial, peer-to-peer technologies while maintaining strong oversight of custodial financial institutions.

The updated bill reflects a careful balance–building on FinCEN’s 2019 guidance to clarify that when developers and infrastructure providers don’t control customer funds, they shouldn’t be regulated like money transmitters.

Despite concerns about the “Gensler-era” amendment, industry players like crypto exchange Coinbase affirmed that “Bipartisan momentum is building. Lawmakers from both sides agree: it’s time to protect consumers and unlock American innovation with clear crypto legislation. As Congress prepares for a key vote to advance the CLARITY Act, the message is clear: vote YES.”

At the time of writing, the legislation passed the House Committee on Agriculture markup with a 47-6 vote after a nearly 3-hour debate. Now, the bill awaits the House Financial Services Committee markup, Terret reported.

crypto, bitcoin, btc, btcusdt

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $108,959 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

İlgili Okumalar

Pantera Capital: As Perpetual Contracts Move Towards the Financial Center, Hyperliquid Aims to Be All-Encompassing

Perpetual futures ("perps"), once a crypto-native phenomenon, are becoming a dominant global financial instrument, evolving into a fundamental market structure shift that traditional finance can no longer ignore. This article outlines the advantages of perpetual contracts over traditional futures, highlighting their simplicity (no expiry/rollover), easier risk management, and native 24/7 operation. While the concept is not new, digital assets provided the ideal environment for its explosive growth. Initially dominated by centralized exchanges (CEX), perps have recently migrated significantly to decentralized exchanges (DEX), with Hyperliquid emerging as the leading DEX for perps, capturing ~40% of the on-chain volume. Hyperliquid, built on its own purpose-built L1 blockchain, has successfully expanded beyond crypto into traditional assets like stocks, commodities, and indices, driven by its permissionless listing framework (HIP-3) and 24/7 availability. It has become a crucial price discovery venue during off-hours and for pre-IPO companies, attracting attention from traditional hedge funds and major exchanges like ICE, which now views it as serious competition. The investment thesis for Hyperliquid's token, HYPE, rests on its large and growing total addressable market (TAM) across all finance, strong execution, superior user experience, and direct value accrual via aggressive token buybacks using 99% of protocol revenue. Key risks remain, primarily regulatory uncertainty in the U.S., though recent CFTC actions approving certain regulated crypto perp contracts signal a potential shift toward broader acceptance. The core question is no longer if perpetuals matter beyond crypto, but whether blockchain-based infrastructure like Hyperliquid can become the primary venue for pricing, trading, and discovering risk across all financial domains.

marsbit12 dk önce

Pantera Capital: As Perpetual Contracts Move Towards the Financial Center, Hyperliquid Aims to Be All-Encompassing

marsbit12 dk önce

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

This article examines the rise of prediction markets, contrasting their growing institutional acceptance in the West with their restrictive regulation in Asia. It details how prediction markets, which originated from informal political betting and academic experiments like the Iowa Electronic Market, aggregate crowd wisdom into probabilistic prices through binary contracts. Their growth accelerated around 2020, reaching over $14 billion in monthly volume. A key driver is the "skin in the game" principle, where users risk their own capital, leading to high accuracy in predicting events like Fed rate decisions and elections, as demonstrated by platforms like Polymarket. Meta's entry, with Mark Zuckerberg reportedly leading the development of the Arena app, signals the market's maturation. In the U.S., court rulings have distinguished prediction markets from gambling, facilitating entry by traditional financial institutions. However, most Asian jurisdictions still classify them as gambling, focusing on social control rather than financial innovation. The article argues this stance creates three problems for Asia: 1) regulatory arbitrage pushes users to riskier offshore platforms, 2) loss of sovereign information infrastructure as valuable social sentiment data accumulates abroad, and 3) abandonment of user protection. It concludes that Asia needs a policy shift from prohibition to constructive regulation, integrating these markets into the formal system to harness their data as a national asset, as initiatives like Limitless Research are beginning to do.

marsbit2 saat önce

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

marsbit2 saat önce

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手4 saat önce

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手4 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片