Mean Reversion

insights.glassnode2025-04-23 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-04-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Executive Summary

  • Bitcoin has surged to $94.7k following optimism around potential easing of U.S.–China tariff tensions. The price briefly reclaimed the Short-Term Holder Cost Basis ($92.9k), which is a critical mid-point separating bearish and bullish market phases.
  • The Percent Supply in Profit climbed to 87.3%, up from 82.7% when BTC last traded at similar price levels. This indicates that nearly 5% of the supply changed hands during the recent correction.
  • The STH Profit/Loss Ratio hit 1.0, signalling many recent buyers are at break-even, a level often associated with exit risk. Realized profit has also spiked, driven largely by short-term investors locking in gains.
  • Futures open interest has increased by 15.6%. However, funding rates turned negative, showing rising short interest, despite the market trading higher.
  • On 22-April, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a record $1.54B in net inflows, showing a substantial influx of institutional demand. Normalized flow data shows BTC demand has far outpaced ETH demand via the ETFs, helping explain Ethereum’s relative underperformance.
💡
View all charts in this edition in The Week On-chain Dashboard.

After weeks of subdued activity and lower liquidity conditions, the market has finally responded positively to a broader macro catalyst. Following optimistic signals from the U.S. administration regarding tariff relief on Chinese imports, both equities and crypto markets have rallied higher.

In Bitcoin’s case, this rally has briefly broken above a crucial on-chain threshold: the Short-Term Holder (STH) Cost Basis, currently at $92.9k. This model reflects the average acquisition price of market participants who recently acquired their coins, and often acts as a key pivot level. Historically, a sustained break above this price model has marked the transition between periods of bearish corrections and renewed bullish sentiment during recoveries.

However, much like the July–September 2024 period, this move has thus far only resulted in a momentary reclaim of the STH-Cost Basis. This indicates an initial spark of optimism, but has not yet confirmed a complete regime shift back into bullish territory. Sustained strength above this level is likely to improve market confidence, as more investors move back into a meaningful unrealized profit.

glassnode-studio_bitcoin-short-term-on-chain-cost-basis-bands-hourly(9).png
Live Chart

The market’s latest push to $94.3k has been accompanied by a noticeable recovery in unrealized profit held by investors. The Percent Supply in Profit metric has risen to 87.3%, marking a sharp rebound from the lows seen in March.

When Bitcoin last traded at ~$94k, only 82.7% of the supply was in profit. This means that since early March, nearly 5% of the circulating supply has changed hands at lower prices as the market chopped sideways and lower.

Historically, a typical euphoria phase tends to follow this metric stabilizing above 90% for an extended period, signalling widespread profitability and elevated investor confidence.

glassnode-studio_btc-percent-supply-in-profit.png
Live Chart

Another indicator that Bitcoin has returned to an important decision zone is the STH Supply Profit/Loss Ratio, which has recently surged back to its neutral level near 1.0. This suggests that short-term supply is more evenly split between coins in profit and loss, making this a point of balanced sentiment for this cohort.

This structure is significant, and prior bear markets have seen the STH-P/L Ratio trading well below 1, with that level acting as a resistance ceiling. Whenever this metric returns to retest 1.0 from below, it tends to correlate with the formation of a local top, as investors start to exit positions and dampen momentum.

If the market can convincingly reclaim this level and trade above 1.0, it would be a signal of a more robust recovery. Monitoring how this ratio trades over the coming weeks, especially alongside realized profit-taking behaviour, can help navigate whether the market is re-establishing a more constructive recovery out of this correction.

glassnode-studio_bitcoin-short-term-holder-supply-profit-loss-ratio-riding-a-bull(1).png
Live Chart

Profit-Taking Pressure Test

Now that we have a framework for a market which is at a decision point, profit-taking behaviour becomes a critical signal to monitor. Currently, the total Realized Profit on an hourly resolution has surged to $139.9M/hour, which is roughly 17% above its baseline of $120M/hour.

This uptick suggests that many market participants are using this rally to lock in gains. If the market can absorb this selling pressure without breaking down, it paints a more constructive picture on the road ahead.

Conversely, failure to hold these levels, under heavy profit realization, could mark this move as another dead cat bounce, which would be consistent with prior relief rallies that faded under similar conditions.

Live Chart

Who’s Taking Profit?

Beyond just the volume of realized gains, understanding which cohorts are realizing profit offers deeper insight into market sentiment. For this, we turn to the Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR) — a metric that compares the sale price of coins to their original cost basis, offering a lens into the average profit or loss multiple locked in by investors.

SOPR for Short-Term Holders (STH-SOPR) shows that during the recent surge, recent buyers are the primary cohort who are locking in profits.

This is the first significant break of STH-SOPR above the break-even level of 1.0 since late February, and is another relatively constructive sign of investors returning to a profitable position. Generally speaking, STH-SOPR trading consistently above 1.0 is a characteristic of bullish uptrends.

Live Chart

Short Side Perps

While some spot holders appear to be locking in profits, traders of perpetual swaps are tending to lean on the short-side into the rally. The open Interest of perpetual swaps has climbed sharply to 281k BTC, up ~15.6% since the low of 243k BTC set in early March.

This reflects an uptick in leverage within the derivatives markets, which can often amplify market swings if prices start to hit traders' stop-loss or liquidation zones.

glassnode-studio_btc-futures-open-interest-perpetual(4).png
Live Chart

Interestingly, this surge in open interest aligns with a decline in average funding rates, which plunged to -0.023%. This indicates a growing bias toward short-side positioning, suggesting that many traders are betting against the rally, potentially viewing the recent move as overextended.

This divergence between rising open interest and negative funding sets the stage for a possible short squeeze scenario if upward momentum continues.

Live Chart

However, when zooming out to assess longer-term sentiment among perpetual swap traders, the picture turns more cautious. The 7-day moving average of long-side funding paid per hour has declined steadily, now sitting at $88k/hour and still trending lower.

This metric serves as an indicator of the appetite for sustained long exposure, reflecting the dollar value paid by traders who are on the ‘consensus’ side of the market. The current downtrend in premium signals that the majority of positions are indeed shifting towards the short side, which creates an incentive for market makers to take the long side to collect the funding rate interest.

Live Chart

Institutional Interest

ETF flows have become an important proxy for gauging institutional investor sentiment and demand this cycle. Tracking the flows in and out of the ETF products offers a unique lens into the conviction and participation of larger capital allocators.

During Bitcoin’s recent leg up to $94k, the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a staggering $1.54B in net inflows in a single day, one of the highest daily figures since their inception. This influx sends a powerful signal that demand for Bitcoin may be starting to come back online.

glassnode-studio_etf-market-us-spot-etf-netflow-spot-volume.png
Live Chart

Is It Still Bitcoin Season?

Whilst Bitcoin has seen a strong price rebound, many have questioned why Ethereum hasn’t followed suit to the same extent. One answer lies in a comparison of ETF flows, where we normalize and adjust by each asset’s relative spot volume.

Over the past two weeks, the Bitcoin ETFs have seen two distinct inflow waves, each exceeding 10% of BTC’s spot volume, and underscoring a relatively robust institutional demand profile.

By contrast, Ethereum ETF flows have remained quite subdued, with inflows of below 1% of ETH’s spot volume. This stark divergence highlights the disparity in institutional demand between the two assets, which paints a likely reason why ETH continues to lag behind BTC’s recent performance.

Live Chart

Conclusion & Discussion

Bitcoin’s surge back above $94k reflects a mix of macro optimism and shifting investor sentiment. Positive signals around U.S.–China tariffs triggered a rally that reclaimed the Short-Term Holder Cost Basis, and lifted the Percent Supply in Profit to 87.3%. Several metrics allude to a constructive recovery being underway for Bitcoin, with an added element of a short squeeze brewing in futures markets.

Institutional demand may be returning for Bitcoin, with the ETFs seeing $1.54B in net inflows in a single day. The market is very much at a decision point, and the key level to watch is the Short—Term Holder cost basis, which often delineates bullish and bearish market structure. The bulls need to drive the market above this price model, and keep it there.


Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for informational, and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies. 

Please read our Transparency Notice when using exchange data.



İlgili Okumalar

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

Lilian Weng, former OpenAI security VP and co-founder of Thinking Machines Lab, has published a new blog post titled "Harness Engineering for Self-Improvement," proposing a pragmatic path for AI self-evolution. She argues that Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) may practically begin at the "Harness" layer—the external runtime system governing how models use tools, manage context, and execute tasks—rather than directly from the model rewriting its own weights. The blog outlines a progression from optimizing prompts (Context Engineering) to designing workflows, and ultimately to Self-Improving Harness systems. These systems can identify their own weaknesses, propose targeted, verifiable modifications to the harness code, and validate improvements. Works like Self-Harness and Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM) demonstrate significant performance gains on benchmarks like SWE-bench through such automated harness evolution, rivaling handcrafted agents. DeepSeek researcher Tianyi Cui endorsed the view, noting harness-based self-evolution is as promising as model-based approaches. Weng emphasizes this is complementary to model training, with both reinforcing each other. However, key challenges remain: weak evaluators for subjective tasks, reward hacking, diversity collapse, managing long-term system health versus short-term success, and defining the human oversight role. The consensus is growing: the harness is a critical variable, as the same model can exhibit vastly different capabilities within different harness systems.

marsbit14 dk önce

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

marsbit14 dk önce

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (July 8) This is an informal column from Odaily's editorial team, sharing immediate thoughts on industry news, data, and hot topics from various angles. It presents investment ideas and opportunity hypotheses still under verification—which may not be direct wealth codes but questions in themselves—alongside observations from industry interactions and materials that genuinely enhance the team's understanding. The content is based on real investment and observation experiences, carries no advertising, and does not constitute investment advice. Its purpose is to broaden perspectives and supplement information sources, not to create consensus. Team Member Shares: * **Wenser (@wenser2010):** Noted a deeper correction (nearly 30%) in US and Korean stocks, including memory stocks, but remains bullish on DRAM due to perceived supply shortages. In prediction markets, personal small bets outperformed blind copying; favors France to win the World Cup. Views crypto-related stocks like STRK as bearish for now, while seeing Circle and Coinbase as potential rebound plays. Observes recent strength in software stocks like Microsoft but is unsure if it's a sustained recovery. * **Bcxiongdi (@bcxiongdi):** Discusses the recent "recovery training" in meme coin markets on Solana and BSC, characterized by small-scale PVP opportunities, admitting to having sold many assets too early. Suggests also watching the Robinhood chain. Found World Cup prediction markets challenging, advising to consider buying during matches rather than only before. * **Azuma (@azuma_eth):** Focuses on the US stock market, particularly the significant semiconductor correction. Believes demand fundamentals remain and considers buying the dip in DRAM stocks. Notes a potential rotation signal as hedge funds have recently concentrated buying in tech stocks. Plans to continue adding to RKLB (Rocket Lab) stock, seeing limited downside and high upside potential at current levels after its founder's share sale window closed.

Odaily星球日报30 dk önce

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily星球日报30 dk önce

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Former Huawei "Genius Youth" Li Bojie recently drew public attention by criticizing his interview experience with DeepSeek. The controversy escalated when Du Jun, co-founder of Web3 investment firm ABCDE Capital, publicly accused Li of being "the founder with the least sense of contractual spirit" he had ever cooperated with, sparking a dispute over Li's startup project, Metagent. Li detailed a frustrating DeepSeek interview where he was accused of potential plagiarism, leading him to end the session. The spotlight then shifted to his venture, Metagent, a Web3+AI project aiming to tokenize AI agents. ABCDE invested $1.5 million, with an initial $500k disbursed. Du Jun claimed the project's progress was severely lacking, with a poor-quality demo and minimal social media activity. He alleged Li stopped communicating, deleted his Telegram, and failed to provide proper financial reporting. In response, Li argued the remaining $1 million was never received, crippling operations and forcing salary cuts. He stated he left Metagent in October 2024 due to family reasons and Web3 compliance concerns, with board approval. He claimed to have fulfilled disclosure duties and that his subsequent projects avoided conflicting fields. Other investors, including ArkStream Capital, shared negative due diligence experiences, citing unprofessional contracts and evasive answers on tokenomics. Metagent's social media went silent in June 2024, effectively stalling. Li has since moved to a new consumer AI agent platform, Pine AI (formerly Logenic AI), which has raised $25 million in Series A funding. He served as its Chief Scientist but recently left, clarifying he was not the founder and departed due to a shift in research interests.

Foresight News1 saat önce

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片