Биткоин сохраняет устойчивость на фоне политического давления Трампа

cryptonews.ru2025-01-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-04-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Политическое давление Трампа на ФРС не мешает биткоину удерживать $85,000 благодаря резервам.

Биткоин продолжает демонстрировать стабильность, удерживая цену в диапазоне $84,000–$85,000, несмотря на нарастающее политическое давление со стороны президента США Дональда Трампа на Федеральную резервную систему (ФРС). Как сообщает CoinDesk, Трамп открыто обсуждает возможность увольнения председателя ФРС Джерома Пауэлла, обвиняя его в ошибочной монетарной политике. Это давление, связанное с тарифной политикой и высокими процентными ставками, усиливает неопределенность на финансовых рынках, но биткоин остается устойчивым, что подчеркивает его роль как актива-убежища.

Рыночная стабильность биткоина поддерживается несколькими факторами. Во-первых, инвесторы рассматривают криптовалюту как “цифровое золото”, особенно в условиях экономической нестабильности, вызванной тарифами Трампа, которые могут усилить инфляцию, как отметил Пауэлл в The New York Times. Во-вторых, трейдеры проявляют осторожный оптимизм, активно покупая колл-опционы на рост до $90,000–$100,000 и защитные пут-опционы на $80,000, согласно данным Deribit Insights. Кроме того, создание “Стратегического резерва биткоина”, объявленное администрацией Трампа в марте 2025 года, укрепляет доверие к криптовалюте, уменьшая доступное предложение.

Несмотря на политическую напряженность, прямое влияние на цену биткоина остается ограниченным. Пауэлл настаивает на независимости ФРС и не планирует уходить до конца срока в 2026 году, как указано в Reuters. Однако вероятность его увольнения, оцениваемая в 19% на Polymarket, продолжает поддерживать повышенную волатильность на рынках. Эксперты, такие как Ричард Кларида, отмечают, что ФРС вряд ли снизит ставки без явных признаков экономического спада, что может способствовать дальнейшей стабильности биткоина в краткосрочной перспективе. Инвесторы внимательно следят за развитием событий, ожидая, как политические решения повлияют на экономику и криптовалютный рынок.

İlgili Okumalar

Q2 Crypto Market Review: Did Bitcoin Rise for 'Nothing'? Did Money Flow to AI and On-Chain?

Q2 2026 Crypto Market Recap: Bitcoin's Gains Erased Amid Shift to AI and On-Chain Activity The second quarter of 2026 saw a significant reversal for the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin gave back all its April gains, ending Q2 down approximately 11%, while major stock indices posted strong gains. This divergence was driven by a hawkish shift in Fed rate expectations, capital rotation into AI stocks, and weakening liquidity channels into crypto. Key demand pillars deteriorated simultaneously. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of $4.08 billion for the quarter, with outflows dominating June. Crypto treasury entity Strategy's bitcoin accumulation slowed markedly, and the total stablecoin market cap contracted by ~$4.2 billion. This created a tighter liquidity environment. Exchange data reflected the downturn. Spot trading volumes fell 28% quarter-over-quarter. The market underwent significant deleveraging, with $8.35 billion in long liquidations for BTC and ETH, primarily in late May/early June. Open interest and order book liquidity also declined. Despite the bearish price action, structural developments point to an expanding on-chain ecosystem. These include the rise of tokenized stocks with full legal rights, the growth of RWA (real-world asset) perpetual contracts for trading stocks and commodities 24/7, and the use of crypto markets for price discovery ahead of major events like the SpaceX IPO. On-chain vaults are also emerging as a core layer for institutional capital allocation.

Foresight News17 dk önce

Q2 Crypto Market Review: Did Bitcoin Rise for 'Nothing'? Did Money Flow to AI and On-Chain?

Foresight News17 dk önce

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

Xing Bo, President of MBZUAI and professor at Carnegie Mellon University, along with co-authors Mingkai Deng and Jinyu Hou, has released a new paper, "Critique of Agent Model," critiquing the current state of artificial intelligence agents. The paper draws a crucial distinction between "agentic" systems, which rely on external toolchains, prompts, and workflows, and truly "agentive" systems capable of genuine autonomy driven by internal decision-making structures. To illustrate this, it references a real-world incident where an AI programming assistant, following an external prompt but lacking internalized judgment, caused a catastrophic data deletion. The authors propose a detailed analysis and a new framework, "Goal-Identity-Configurator" (GIC), for building truly autonomous agents. This framework systematically addresses five key dimensions where current "Agent" designs fall short: 1. **Goal:** Moving from step-by-step human instruction to a system capable of autonomously decomposing a single long-term goal and adapting sub-goals based on new information. 2. **Identity:** Evolving self-assessment updated by experience, rather than a static description in a system prompt. 3. **Decision Making:** Replacing textual Chain-of-Thought reasoning with "simulative reasoning" that uses a dedicated world model to predict real-world consequences before selecting actions. 4. **Cognitive Control:** Introducing a separate "System III" metacognitive module that dynamically decides when to deliberate, stick to a plan, or act quickly. 5. **Learning:** Enabling "continual autonomous learning," where the agent itself decides when to act, practice in simulation, or update its world model and self-perception. The GIC architecture integrates six components—a belief encoder, goal decomposer, identity evolver, configurator (System III), simulation-based planner (System II), and executor (System I)—to embody these principles. The paper argues that a growth path akin to pilot training (ground theory, simulator practice, real deployment) should be underpinned by a unified cognitive architecture, not separate workflows. On safety, the authors contend that the GIC framework's modular, explicit design enhances inspectability, allowing problematic behavior to be traced to specific components (e.g., flawed goal or poorly trained module) rather than emerging opaquely. However, they acknowledge that ultimate safety depends on correctly training these modules in the first place. In conclusion, the paper challenges the loose application of the term "Agent," asserting that task completion alone does not equal true autonomy. True autonomy requires goals, identity, and judgment to be genuinely internalized within the agent's architecture, not merely enforced by external scripts.

marsbit59 dk önce

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

marsbit59 dk önce

How Collector Crypt Uses 'Recirculating Buybacks' to Create an Illusion of Growth

Title: How Collector Crypt Creates a Growth Illusion with "Buyback Loops" Key Findings: Collector Crypt's (CC) net take rate has halved from 11.2% in Q3 2025 to 5.6% in Q2 2026, while GMV grew 4.7x. This growth is driven by higher-tier card packs ($250, $1,000, $2,500) which have lower platform dollar retention rates. The newly launched $2,500 Mythic tier captured 36.7% of June GMV within 13 days. Growth is fueled by a small cohort of high-spending, high-frequency wallets rather than broad user base expansion. The economic model faces pressure from three key areas: 1) **Shifting GMV Mix**: Pushing users towards larger, lower-retention card packs increases GMV but reduces overall profitability. 2) **Physical Redemptions**: Card redemptions for physical items remove reusable inventory from the system, creating costly replenishment needs. In May, redemptions consumed 41.6% of pre-redemption net income. Only 75 wallets drove redemptions in June. 3) **B2B/API Strategy**: Partner revenue remains negligible (cumulatively $1.83M) and dependent on CC for inventory, vaulting, and buyback services, failing to create a scalable, asset-light recurring revenue stream. The core product is a repetitive pack-buyback loop with limited secondary market activity and token value accrual. Sensitive modeling shows CC's economics turn negative when any two of the following pressures coincide: replenishment costs near market price, redemption rates exceeding 9%, or high-tier buyback rates around 93%. While CC operates in a large and growing collectibles market, its current growth levers—bigger packs, high buyback rates, and capital recycling by a few wallets—create a volume illusion without demonstrating sustainable collector engagement, deep secondary markets, or a viable path to improved margins. Future proof points include broadening collector participation, deepening secondary trading, and developing true asset-light B2B revenue channels.

Foresight News1 saat önce

How Collector Crypt Uses 'Recirculating Buybacks' to Create an Illusion of Growth

Foresight News1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片