Investors Not Looking to Bail Out Struggling Celsius Network (Report)

CryptoPotato2022-06-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-06-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Celsius' recent problems continue to spiral on with new reports claiming that former investors do not wish to pour any more funds.

Amid the challenges plaguing the cryptocurrency lending firm Celsius Network, there are reports that investors may not provide more funds to bail the platform out of the troubled waters.
No Investor Bail Out for Celsius
According to the Wall Street Journal on Thursday (June 16, 2022), anonymous sources revealed that Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, a Canadian fund, and growth-equity firm WestCap Group, which led Celsius Series B funding round last year that raised $75 million, may not provide more funds to help the struggling crypto lender.
Another source also noted that current investors are either willing to wait for a Celsius acquisition or a restructure of the platform. One person familiar with the talks between Celsius and its investors said, “few are feeling OK about things. There was more risk in this than fully appreciated.”
The latest development comes amid Celsius being insolvent and facing a liquidity crisis. On-chain data has shown that the platform held a large amount of staked ether (stETH).
Celsius took ETH deposited by customers and staked them on the Ethereum Beacon chain via the liquid staking protocol Lido and received stETH in return. The company then deployed these new tokens on other DeFi protocols to generate yield.
“Staked ETH has increasingly become decoupled from ether amid concerns over the delayed merge on Ethereum. Consequently, large holders have been dumping the coin, and this continues to dry up liquidity for any swaps from stETH back to ETH.”

This means Celsius will find it difficult to sell its large stETH holdings on the open market. Such a situation has served to compound the firm’s liquidity crisis.
On June 13, Celsius suspended withdrawals, swaps, and transfers between accounts. According to the lender, the tumbling crypto market caused the company to freeze withdrawals.
Regulatory Trouble on the Horizon
In a bid to solve mounting financial problems, Celsius Network recently hired restructuring lawyers from the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP.
Following the withdrawal suspension, rival lending platform Nexo revealed that it is looking to acquire qualifying assets of Celsius. The latter has until June 20 to respond to the offer.
Meanwhile, amid the issues facing Celsius, reports emerged that securities regulators in Texas, Alabama, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Washington are investigating the firm’s decision to halt withdrawals.
A statement from the Texas State Securities Board enforcement director, Joseph Rotunda, said:
“I am very concerned that clients – including many retail investors – may need to immediately access their assets yet are unable to withdraw from their accounts. The inability to access their investment may result in significant financial consequences”.

İlgili Okumalar

The Real Battlefield of AI Lies in the 'Dark Forest'

The article "AI's Real Battlefield is in the 'Dark Forest'" discusses the shifting dynamics in the global AI landscape, contrasting the strategic directions of Chinese and U.S. AI developers. Chinese companies like Alibaba (with its "HappyHorse" video model), ByteDance (Seedance 2.0), and Kuaishou (Kling 3.0) have taken the lead in text-to-video generation, surpassing OpenAI’s now-discontinued Sora. These models are deeply integrated into their parent companies’ content ecosystems (e.g., Douyin, Kuaishou), serving to reduce content creation costs and enhance user engagement rather than operating as standalone profit centers. In contrast, U.S. firms are pivoting toward high-stakes enterprise and security applications. Anthropic’s Claude Mythos model demonstrates advanced capabilities in autonomously discovering and exploiting software vulnerabilities, prompting concern at the highest levels of U.S. financial and governmental institutions. OpenAI responded with its own GPT-5.4-Cyber, signaling a strategic shift from consumer-facing products to enterprise-grade tools focused on cybersecurity and programming. The divergence is attributed to fundamental differences in resources and market structures. U.S. companies, backed by vast computational resources (e.g., Amazon and Google supply Anthropic with substantial funding and TPU access), can pursue deep, specialized R&D in high-value B2B sectors. Chinese firms, facing significant compute power constraints and a less mature enterprise SaaS market, have found success by leveraging their massive consumer platforms and optimizing for cost-efficiency. The article warns that the AI race is entering a "dark forest" phase—a reference to competitive dynamics where cybersecurity capabilities could determine digital sovereignty. While Chinese models like Zhipu AI’s GLM-5.1 show promise in narrowing the gap in coding proficiency, the author stresses that achieving parity in security-critical AI will require asymmetric strategies, including greater investment in coding models, adaptation to domestic hardware, and exploring international markets in the Global South.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Real Battlefield of AI Lies in the 'Dark Forest'

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片