Задержка правосудия? Апелляция по иску Ripple против SEC грозит закрытием

cryptonews.ru2022-05-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-12-22 tarihinde güncellendi

  • Апелляция Ripple против SEC продвигается вперед, основные сроки ее рассмотрения установлены на 2025 год.
  • Реакция SEC на дело Ripple может быть отложена из-за возможной приостановки работы правительства США.
  • Ripple сохраняет уверенность, несмотря на продолжающиеся проблемы и апелляции по иску XRP.

Апелляция по иску Ripple против SEC продвигается вперед, и Апелляционный суд девятого округа назначил ключевые даты на 2025 год.

#XRP NEWS FLASH 🚨 Ripple gets a new date from the US court of appeal against the SEC 💪✅️

This is a new development according to a close source, as the dragging lawsuit comes to an end on Monday, the 23rd of Dec 2024.

YES!!! WE DID IT 💪💪 WE WON $XRP 🏆 😎 pic.twitter.com/yNf9hWyGY6

— RippleLord 🥇 (@Ripplelordz) December 21, 2024

Однако надвигается потенциальная приостановка работы правительства США, что грозит отсрочить и без того затянувшуюся юридическую тяжбу и окончательное решение о нормативном статусе XRP. Поскольку криптосообщество внимательно следит за развитием событий, суд назначил дату апелляции на 6 марта 2025 года, а Ripple и генеральный директор Брэд Гарлингхаус, как ожидается, подадут свои ответные документы к 7 апреля 2025 года.

Ключевые даты: Посредничество и распоряжения о стенограммах

До главного события 2025 года истец Брэдли Состэк должен подать ходатайство о посредничестве до 23 декабря 2024 года.

Кроме того, постановление о слушании апелляции назначено на 31 декабря, а стенограмма апелляции должна быть представлена к 30 января 2025 года. В заявлении суда указано, что непредставление этих документов может повлечь за собой отклонение апелляции, что обеспечит соблюдение обеими сторонами установленных сроков.

Иск Ripple SEC: апелляция

Несмотря на успех Ripple в окружном суде, где судья Филлис Гамильтон вынесла решение в пользу компании и удовлетворила ходатайства об изменении постановлений, истец Брэдли Состак продолжает оспаривать результат. Он пытается обжаловать постановления, надеясь отменить решение суда.

Читайте также: Ripple против SEC: пропущенный срок подачи апелляции может положить конец судебному процессу по XRP

Однако, поскольку судебный процесс по XRP продолжается, SEC сталкивается с дополнительными трудностями. Правительство США приближается к риску остановки из-за претензий по финансированию, что вызывает обеспокоенность по поводу задержек в ответе SEC на апелляцию.

Приостановка работы правительства может еще больше осложнить судебный процесс, затянув принятие решений и усилив давление на все вовлеченные стороны.

Кроме того, задержка с ответами SEC может дать Ripple больше времени для подготовки своей защиты, но это также может задержать принятие окончательного решения о нормативном статусе XRP.

İlgili Okumalar

White-Label Stablecoins: More Than Just a Logo Change

"White-Label Stablecoins: Beyond a Logo Change" The article clarifies the often-misunderstood concept of "white-label stablecoins," which refers to businesses leveraging established providers like Circle or Coinbase to offer stablecoin functionality under their own brand. It details four distinct models, emphasizing that this is not a simple branding exercise but involves complex legal and operational responsibilities split across issuance, reserves, custody, and distribution. The four primary models are: 1. **Circle xReserve**: Enables blockchains (L1/L2) to launch their own stablecoin backed 1:1 by USDC locked in a Circle smart contract. The chain deploys and operates the token contract. 2. **Circle Partner Stablecoins**: Connects existing regional stablecoin issuers to Circle's global payment and liquidity network (e.g., StableFX). The local issuer remains responsible for issuance, reserves, and compliance. 3. **Circle Digital Asset Accounts**: Provides businesses with branded digital asset accounts where users hold established stablecoins (like USDC). Circle handles custody, conversion, and compliance; the business manages the front-end user experience. 4. **Coinbase Custom Stablecoins**: The model closest to a true "white-label" stablecoin. Coinbase manages the issuance, reserves, smart contracts, and redemption for a new, custom-branded stablecoin (e.g., Flipcash's USDF), while the partner business handles branding, distribution, and user-facing scenarios. The article stresses that legal and regulatory risks depend heavily on the specific model and the partner's role. Key concerns include clear user disclosure about the issuer and redemption rights, managing consumer perceptions, careful structuring of any revenue-sharing or yield features, and navigating local regulatory frameworks for payments, distribution, and marketing—responsibilities that cannot be outsourced simply by using a "white-label" service.

marsbit13 dk önce

White-Label Stablecoins: More Than Just a Logo Change

marsbit13 dk önce

Farewell to Speculation: The Graham Moment of the Crypto Industry

"Farewell to Speculation: The Graham Moment for the Crypto Industry" The article draws a parallel between today's cryptocurrency market and the speculative, unregulated US stock market of the 1920s. That era lacked mandatory corporate disclosure, enabling rampant manipulation and turning stocks into gambling tools. The 1929 crash led to foundational reforms: the Securities Acts of 1933/34 mandated transparent, audited financial reporting, and Benjamin Graham's "Security Analysis" provided a framework for fundamental valuation. Together, they created modern investing, requiring both reliable data and a methodology to value assets. Similarly, the crypto market is currently driven by narratives and speculation. However, it possesses a key advantage: unlike 1920s corporations, blockchain protocols have inherently transparent, on-chain data for revenue, treasury, and activity. The core obstacle is not transparency, but the lack of legal claim to that value. Due to regulatory uncertainty (primarily the Howey Test), most tokens are deliberately stripped of economic rights like profit-sharing to avoid being classified as securities. This creates a paradox where protocols generate revenue, but token holders have no right to it. The turning point, argues the author, is imminent US legislation. The already-passed GENIUS Act provides a framework for stablecoins. The crucial CLARITY Act, currently in advanced legislative stages, aims to clearly categorize digital assets and define their regulatory treatment (SEC vs. CFTC). This would allow developers to legally design tokens with enforceable economic rights, such as profit distribution. If passed, this would enable a shift from speculation to fundamental investment. Analysis would focus on protocol revenue sustainability, network effects, valuation multiples, and the specific rights encoded in a token's contract—mirroring traditional equity analysis. The article notes significant legislative hurdles and timelines (1-3 years for rulemaking post-passage), but emphasizes the direction is set. A deeper challenge remains: building decentralized, legally enforceable governance and ownership structures to protect token holder rights, akin to corporate law. This will be a core development focus. The transformation applies mainly to revenue-generating protocol tokens, not to assets like Bitcoin (digital gold). The article concludes that the industry's question has evolved from "can tokens create value?" to "who gets to allocate that value?". Solving the latter, as in the 1920s, will mark crypto's transition to a legitimate asset class for fundamental investment.

Foresight News35 dk önce

Farewell to Speculation: The Graham Moment of the Crypto Industry

Foresight News35 dk önce

Quantum Computing "Manhattan Project" Unveiled: Is the Encryption Industry at a Critical Turning Point?

"Quantum Computing 'Manhattan Project' Launched: Is the Crypto Industry at a Critical Juncture?" On June 22, former U.S. President Donald Trump signed two executive orders. The first mandates all federal agencies upgrade their cryptographic systems to new, quantum-resistant standards by 2030. The second orders the Department of Energy to lead the development of a national quantum computer, signaling a shift from laboratory research to a state-enforced national agenda. This creates a hard deadline. A powerful quantum computer could break current encryption. The threat is compounded by "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks, where encrypted data is stored today for future decryption. Federal agencies must appoint migration officers and complete post-quantum cryptography (PQC) upgrades for key establishment by 2030 and digital signatures by 2031. Procurement rules will also be changed, forcing government contractors to comply. The crypto industry faces a direct threat. Bitcoin's ECDSA signatures are theoretically vulnerable. Research indicates millions of Bitcoin with exposed public keys are at risk if quantum computers advance. While projects like Bitcoin Quantum testnets and efforts by Ethereum, Solana, NEAR, and Zcash are exploring quantum-resistant solutions, achieving consensus in decentralized networks remains a major challenge. The centralized U.S. government has started a 5-year countdown. For decentralized crypto networks, the real test is whether they can complete this anti-quantum upgrade before the theoretical threat becomes a practical reality.

Foresight News56 dk önce

Quantum Computing "Manhattan Project" Unveiled: Is the Encryption Industry at a Critical Turning Point?

Foresight News56 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片