今晚开盘,浅析Pudgy Penguins(PENGU)估值预期

Odaily星球日报2024-12-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-12-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

今晚9:00开放申领,超50%代币将空投给社区。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina
作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth

今晚开盘,浅析Pudgy Penguins(PENGU)估值预期


备受关注的 Pudgy Penguins 代币(PENGU)将于今晚正式上线。


Pudgy Penguins 首席执行官 Luca Netz 今晨于 X 发文表示,美东时间明日 8: 00 (北京时间今晚 21: 00),符合条件的参与者(包括 Pudgy Penguins、Lil Pudgys、Rogs 和 SBTs 持有者等等)可以开始申领 PENGU。申领周期共 88 天,所有未领取供应将在第 88 天后永久锁定/销毁。


Pudgy Toys 的买家也将被纳入空投范围,但由于 Pudgy Toys / Pudgy World 建立在 Abstract 上。当 Abstract 主网上线时,通过 LayerZero 申领 PENGU 的桥接功能也将上线,之后 Pudgy Toys 买家也将能够申领他们的 PENGU,更多细节将于明年 1 月 Abstract 主网上线之际公布。



PENGU 代币经济模型


PENGU 总供应量为 88, 888, 888, 888 枚,将基于 Solana 网络发行,代币合约地址为 2 zMMhcVQEXDtdE 6 vsFS 7 S 7 D5 oUodfJHE 8 vd 1 gnBouauv。PENGU 的流通供应量将为 62, 415, 951, 646 枚,约占总供应量的 70.22% 。


PENGU 的具体分配方案如下:

  • 29.78% 的 PENGU 将分配给团队、投资人及顾问,该部分代币将锁仓 1 年,之后分 3 年时间线性释放;
  • 47.87% 的 PENGU 将用于社区空投;
  • 12.35% 的 PENGU 将用于构建初始流动性;
  • 4% 的 PENGU 将用于支持公共事务发展;
  • 3% 的 PENGU 将用于营销及扩展。


今晚开盘,浅析Pudgy Penguins(PENGU)估值预期




如下图所示,除了团队、投资人及顾问份额之外,其他部分的 PENGU 分配均将于开盘之时解锁。

今晚开盘,浅析Pudgy Penguins(PENGU)估值预期


PENGU 估值预期

当前,多个 pre-launch 交易市场均已开放 PENGU 的盘前交易。截至北京时间 13: 00 左右,各平台估值报价如下。

  • Aevo 上 PENGU 暂报 0.04128 美元,对应流通市值(MC)约 25.76 亿美元,对应全流通估值(FDV)约 36.69 亿美元;
  • whales.market 上 PENGU 暂报 0.0439 美元,对应流通市值(MC)约 27.4 亿美元,对应全流通估值(FDV)约 39 亿美元;

如果用 APE、MOCA 等 NFT 系代币,以及 PEPE、WIF 等动物系 meme 代币作为参考标的,PENGU 的估值预期如下。

今晚开盘,浅析Pudgy Penguins(PENGU)估值预期


小结

鉴于当前市场的火热情绪,再加之 Pudgy Penguins 在 NFT 细分赛道内日渐稳固的龙头位置,预期 PENGU 开盘之后将会吸引极大流量,但考虑到 PENGU 开盘之初流通比例较大,不可避免地会出现一定的空投获利抛压,各位投资者需结合个人预期理性操作,DYOR。

İlgili Okumalar

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手52 dk önce

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手52 dk önce

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit1 saat önce

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit1 saat önce

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手1 saat önce

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片