Ripple Labs Nears New York Approval For Stablecoin Launch In US Crypto Market

bitcoinist2024-11-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-12-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Ripple Labs is on the verge of receiving approval from New York’s top crypto regulator for its new stablecoin, RLUSD....

Ripple Labs is on the verge of receiving approval from New York’s top crypto regulator for its new stablecoin, RLUSD. According to a Fox Business report, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) is expected to greenlight the stablecoin, with a potential launch date set for December 4.

Ripple Set To Launch RLUSD Stablecoin

If approved, Ripple will legally be able to offer RLUSD to the public, solidifying its position as a major player in New York’s regulated digital finance market and expanding its footprint to the broader stablecoin ecosystem. 

However, both Ripple Labs and the regulator have yet to comment on the matter or provide any official communication to further corroborate the information gathered by Fox’s sources.

Ripple’s primary business revolves around its decentralized global payments network, RippleNet, which leverages blockchain technology to facilitate faster, cheaper, and more efficient cross-border transactions for banks and businesses. 

This approach serves as an alternative to the traditional global bank settlement system, SWIFT. Ripple’s native token, XRP, acts as a bridge currency for settlement, although its status remains uncertain due to ongoing legal challenges with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

The SEC has argued that XRP should be classified as an “unregistered security,” a claim Ripple contests in an appeals case currently before the Second Circuit.

The legal battle has had significant implications for XRP’s market performance. Following the SEC’s lawsuit in late 2020, XRP’s price plummeted over 50%, resulting in a market cap loss of approximately $16 billion. Since then, XRP has fluctuated, often remaining below the $1 mark as Ripple navigates its legal challenges. 

However, recent developments, including Donald Trump’s election victory on November 5, ant the official departure announcement by the SEC chair Gary Gensler, have spurred optimism among investors, boosting XRP’s price to $1.89 and positioning it as the fifth largest cryptocurrency by market cap, exceeding $107 billion.

Competing With Established Stablecoins 

By entering the stablecoin market with RLUSD, Ripple aims to provide a stable alternative for customers seeking to utilize digital currencies without the volatility associated with XRP.

To operate within this regulatory framework, the firm is expected to obtain a limited purpose trust charter, allowing it to offer specific digital asset-related services without the complexities associated with traditional banking regulations. 

Additionally, the NYDFS offers a BitLicense, which enables exchanges such as Coinbase and Robinhood to provide trading and custody services for cryptocurrencies.

Ripple’s entry into the stablecoin sector comes at a time when other firms, including Paxos and Gemini, have already secured approval to offer their stablecoins, PAX and GUSD, respectively. 

Keith Grossman, president of Enterprise at MoonPay, expressed enthusiasm for the new entry into the stablecoin market, highlighting the importance of “well-capitalized, highly regulated players” in the evolving global financial landscape.

Ripple
The daily chart shows XRP’s price trending upwards. Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com 

Ronaldo Marquez

Ronaldo Marquez

Ronaldo is a seasoned crypto enthusiast with over four years of experience in the field. He is passionate about exploring the vast and dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and its practical applications for achieving economic sovereignty. Ronaldo is constantly seeking to expand his knowledge and expertise in the DeFi space, as he believes it holds tremendous potential for transforming the traditional financial landscape.

İlgili Okumalar

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

"Investors are pouring billions into Chinese AI startups with no profits, betting on the future of the industry. A state-backed fund is reportedly in talks to lead DeepSeek's funding at a $45B valuation, just weeks after it was valued at $10B. Along with companies like Zhipu AI, MiniMax, and Kimi (backed by Meituan and Alibaba), their combined valuation exceeds $140B. This isn't a typical venture capital play. Investors are paying for 'future definition rights'—a chance to set the standards for the next tech era. Morgan Stanley notes a 6-12 month window for this scarcity premium before more AI companies go public. Despite massive losses, these companies show strong growth. Zhipu AI's API revenue grew 60x, Kimi's annual recurring revenue doubled to $200M in a month, and MiniMax turned its gross margin positive, with over 70% of revenue from overseas. Their valuations vastly exceed profitable firms like iFlytek. Crucially, technical progress underpins this growth. DeepSeek's latest model boasts costs just 1% of a leading competitor's, while Zhipu AI has raised API prices due to high demand. However, gaps with top global models remain. Tech giants like Tencent and Alibaba, investing heavily while describing their own AI efforts as 'leaky boats,' are also investing in these startups as a hedge. Key risks loom: the closing scarcity window, computing power bottlenecks limiting growth, and the sustainability of DeepSeek's cost-advantage model. With state capital now a major player, the success of these companies has become a strategic national concern. The next year will test if their soaring valuations can be justified by future profits."

marsbit47 dk önce

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

marsbit47 dk önce

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

On May 22, the U.S. SEC postponed the release of a key "innovation exemption" draft that would have permitted crypto-native platforms to issue and trade tokenized U.S. stocks on decentralized venues without full traditional exchange compliance. This would have legalized a "third-party token" model used overseas, where platforms issue tokens tracking stock prices without the underlying company's involvement, raising unresolved questions about shareholder rights, dividends, and sanctions enforcement. Meanwhile, the SEC had already approved a different, compliant path for tokenization led by Nasdaq and NYSE. Their model integrates tokenized stocks into existing settlement systems (like DTCC), preserving all shareholder rights. This creates a fundamental conflict: crypto platforms seek a permissionless, 24/7 on-chain parallel market, while traditional exchanges advocate for an upgraded, regulated version of the current system. Intense lobbying from traditional exchange groups like the World Federation of Exchanges argued the exemption would create an unfair regulatory advantage and dilute investor protection. Even some compliant crypto firms favored delay. Internally, SEC commissioners were divided on the scope and pace of the exemption. The delay highlights a critical policy crossroads. With significant trading volume already occurring overseas, the SEC's decision will determine whether the U.S. embraces a dual-track system for tokenized equities or sidelines itself from an emerging global infrastructure. The core unresolved question remains the legal status and rights of holders of third-party tokenized stocks. The SEC paused because the draft framework risked creating a major new asset class with profound, unanswered legal implications.

marsbit55 dk önce

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

marsbit55 dk önce

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

The article discusses concerns about a potential "super IPO wave" hitting the U.S. stock market, with major companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic preparing to go public. While these large IPOs could collectively raise hundreds of billions, raising fears of a market "blood drain," analysis suggests the impact may be limited. Key points include: * Historical data shows IPO waves often coincide with strong market returns, as they typically occur during periods of high investor demand. * Model estimates suggest even the largest IPOs might only cause a market dip of around 1%. They are more likely to trigger a routine market pullback rather than end a bull market. * The current demand side remains supportive due to high household cash balances, strong corporate earnings growth, continued stock fund inflows, and robust share buyback announcements. * The main risk lies in concentrated investor positions, particularly in large-cap tech stocks, which are at elevated levels. A shift in funds towards new issuances could pressure these crowded sectors. * Recent fund flows show strength concentrated in U.S. and tech stocks, while other regions like Europe and Japan are experiencing outflows. The conclusion is that the IPO wave itself is unlikely to crash the market unless it coincides with a weakening in underlying demand factors like earnings or fund inflows into U.S. equities. The focus should be on whether demand can continue to absorb the new supply.

marsbit1 saat önce

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit1 saat önce

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

Vitalik Buterin recently published an extensive article addressing core concerns about Ethereum's future direction and the role of the Ethereum Foundation (EF). He clarifies that the EF is not his personal domain nor the central authority of Ethereum; it operates as just one node within the broader ecosystem. The board makes collective decisions, with significant operational work led by Aya Miyaguchi, allowing Vitalik to focus on technical matters. The article critiques the perception that the EF should act like a conventional, fast-moving tech company. Buterin warns that merely chasing higher TPS, lower latency, or better marketing—like other chains—risks diluting Ethereum's foundational values. He draws a parallel to Google's evolution away from its "Don't be evil" ethos. Instead, the EF's renewed mandate is to focus on preserving and strengthening Ethereum's core principles, summarized as CROPS: **C**ensorship-resistance, **R**esistance to capture, **O**pen source, **P**rivacy, and **S**ecurity. The foundation will concentrate its limited resources (holding only ~0.16% of ETH) on these long-term, non-commercializable fundamentals, while ecosystem growth, applications, and market-facing activities should be driven by external teams and capital. Buterin outlines key technical priorities aligned with this vision: 1) Advancing formal verification to mathematically prove the absence of bugs; 2) Enhancing consensus security to maintain operation without reliance on social coordination during outages; and 3) Reducing dependency on intermediaries (like RPCs) to strengthen user sovereignty and privacy. He acknowledges ETH as Ethereum's most valuable asset, crucial for security, but stresses that promoting its value is a task for the wider ecosystem, not the EF. Ultimately, Buterin's message is a strategic refocus: the EF will become a smaller, more focused entity guarding Ethereum's essential, harder-to-achieve properties, ensuring it remains distinct not just in performance but in its commitment to decentralization, resistance, and security.

marsbit1 saat önce

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片