Customer stories: Token Terminal’s Data Partnership with Vertex

Token Terminal2024-10-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-11-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Executive summary

Vertex Protocol is one of the fastest growing derivative exchange projects on Sei, with deployments also on Arbitrum, Base, Blast, and Mantle. The project has raised an $8.5m seed round from crypto-native funds, and its core contributors are a team of seasoned traders and engineers spanning both TradFi and DeFi markets. Now, with ~$80m in net deposits, Vertex recognized the need for reliable, continuous, and data-driven stakeholder reporting.

To improve its existing onchain analytics and stakeholder reporting, Vertex turned to Token Terminal, a leading onchain data platform trusted by institutional partners like Bloomberg. Token Terminal's dedicated focus on data standardisation made it an ideal partner for Vertex. The decision to partner was further eased by the fact that Token Terminal already had a public track record of reporting standardised financial and usage metrics for other leading derivative exchange projects, such as GMX, dYdX, Holdstation, and more.

“By partnering with Token Terminal, we’re able to benchmark our performance against the competition in a fair and accurate way. Having a real-time dashboard on Token Terminal is not only a great tool for our team, but for all Vertex stakeholders.”

Darius Tabai, Founding Contributor to Vertex

Data Partnership

To ensure accurate and ongoing stakeholder reporting, Vertex entered into a Data Partnership with Token Terminal.

The Data Partnership consists of four different parts:

1. Smart contract registry

Since Vertex isn’t an appchain, but a set of smart contracts running on multiple chains, this first step did not require a node infrastructure setup. Instead, Token Terminal was able to rely on its existing node infrastructure.

To start, the Vertex and Token Terminal teams worked together to build a labelled registry of Vertex’s smart contracts across chains.

A complete smart contract registry is a prerequisite for the next step: the transformation of raw blockchain data into standardised financial and usage metrics.

2. Metric transformations

Leveraging the information in the smart contract registry, Token Terminal’s research team transformed the raw blockchain data from the smart contracts into standardised financial and usage metrics.

For a derivative exchange project project like Vertex, the standardised metrics include net deposits, notional trading volume, fees, revenue, daily active users, and more.

3. Discovery and reporting

After the metric transformations, Vertex was listed on the derivative exchanges market sector dashboard on Token Terminal, and also featured on the recently launched Discover page. As a result, users, developers, and investors can now refer to a single source when deciding which protocols to use, integrate with, and/or invest in.

For Vertex, the dashboards on Token Terminal streamline the reporting to existing and future stakeholders.

4. Data maintenance

Standardised onchain metrics require ongoing maintenance work, especially when the goal is completeness and accuracy.

The maintenance work has only grown in magnitude and importance over the last few years, as more DeFi projects have evolved from single to multichain apps, with often more than one business line.

A Data Partnership with Token Terminal means that Vertex can rely on Token Terminal to manage all future updates to its metrics, and instead direct all focus on growing its onchain business.

Future opportunities

In addition to standardised financial and usage metrics, Vertex and Token Terminal are excited to explore opportunities to create custom dashboards with more project-specific metrics. These dashboards would offer both LPs and traders deeper insight into the platform’s features and performance. Some examples include LP profitability, trading activity by trader profile, and more.

Through its partnership with Token Terminal, Vertex turns transparency into a competitive advantage and continues to build trust with its growing community.


The authors of this content, or members, affiliates, or stakeholders of Token Terminal may be participating or are invested in protocols or tokens mentioned herein. The foregoing statement acts as a disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and is not a recommendation to purchase or invest in any token or participate in any protocol. Token Terminal does not recommend any particular course of action in relation to any token or protocol. The content herein is meant purely for educational and informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as financial, investment, legal, tax or any other professional or other advice. None of the content and information herein is presented to induce or to attempt to induce any reader or other person to buy, sell or hold any token or participate in any protocol or enter into, or offer to enter into, any agreement for or with a view to buying or selling any token or participating in any protocol. Statements made herein (including statements of opinion, if any) are wholly generic and not tailored to take into account the personal needs and unique circumstances of any reader or any other person. Readers are strongly urged to exercise caution and have regard to their own personal needs and circumstances before making any decision to buy or sell any token or participate in any protocol. Observations and views expressed herein may be changed by Token Terminal at any time without notice. Token Terminal accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or liabilities arising from the use of or reliance on any of this content.

Stay in the loop

Join our mailing list to get the latest insights!

İlgili Okumalar

Following the KelpDAO Hack: $40 Billion in Assets Flee LayerZero, Chainlink Emerges as the Primary 'Beneficiary'

Following a major security breach in April where KelpDAO's bridge using LayerZero was attacked for approximately $292 million, a significant shift is underway in the cross-chain infrastructure landscape. An estimated $40 billion in assets is in the process of migrating or has already migrated from LayerZero to Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP). The attack exploited a single-point-of-failure vulnerability due to KelpDAO's 1-of-1 validator configuration within the LayerZero network. Attackers corrupted RPC nodes and used DDoS attacks to force the system to rely on compromised nodes, allowing fraudulent messages. While LayerZero acknowledged a serious error in allowing its validator network to service high-value transactions with such a configuration, the incident highlighted critical security risks. This triggered a rapid migration wave. Starting with KelpDAO on May 6th, several major protocols—including Solv Protocol, Re, Tydro, Kraken, and Lombard—announced switching their cross-chain infrastructure exclusively to Chainlink CCIP. The combined value of these migrations is estimated to be around $40 billion. This movement followed earlier major adoptions by Coinbase (in late 2025) and Circle (in early 2024). Market sentiment reflected this shift, with LINK's price showing relative stability while ZRO (LayerZero's token) declined significantly. Data indicates a net outflow of approximately $20.1 billion from the LayerZero network over 30 days. The migration is largely driven by perceived security differences. Chainlink CCIP employs a decentralized oracle network as its default consensus layer, featuring multiple independent node operators, a separate Risk Management Network, and built-in safeguards like rate limits. In contrast, LayerZero's highly modular architecture offers flexibility but places more responsibility on application developers to configure security settings, a risk underscored by the KelpDAO incident. LayerZero has since apologized for its communication handling post-attack and stated the protocol itself was not compromised, but rather its Labs DVN's internal RPC was poisoned. An official post-mortem report with external security partners is forthcoming.

marsbit40 dk önce

Following the KelpDAO Hack: $40 Billion in Assets Flee LayerZero, Chainlink Emerges as the Primary 'Beneficiary'

marsbit40 dk önce

Making AI Products Is No Longer the Hard Part; Being Seen Is: Developers, Web3, and Chinese AI Opportunities at mu Shanghai

The article discusses the shifting challenges of AI entrepreneurship, based on insights from the mu Shanghai AI WEEK event in May 2026. As AI tools drastically lower the barrier to creating product prototypes, the core difficulty for startups has moved from "how to build" to "who to build for"—finding real users, sustainable business models, and community engagement. The event itself was structured as an extended, immersive developer community space rather than a traditional conference, attracting a global mix of participants (40% AI, 20-30% Web3). This format emphasized deep networking and collaborative creation over one-way presentations. A key observation is that with powerful models and coding assistants becoming ubiquitous, execution is less of a moat. The new scarce resource is judgment—identifying valuable, defensible scenarios where an application won't be quickly rendered obsolete by the next model update. This pushes competition downstream to distribution, user acquisition, and commercialization. Notably, many Web3 practitioners are migrating into AI, bringing with them expertise in community building, global collaboration, and grassroots marketing—skills highly relevant as AI apps fight for visibility. Meanwhile, opportunities in AI hardware, robotics, and embodied intelligence are seen as more durable, leveraging China's robust manufacturing and supply chain ecosystem as a key advantage. The article notes that major Chinese model companies (like MiniMax) are now actively competing for developer mindshare through community programs, hackathons, and improved tooling, recognizing developers as core users. Ultimately, the conclusion is that while AI simplifies building, the harder part of the journey is ensuring a product is truly needed, understood, and retained by its users.

marsbit59 dk önce

Making AI Products Is No Longer the Hard Part; Being Seen Is: Developers, Web3, and Chinese AI Opportunities at mu Shanghai

marsbit59 dk önce

Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

The rapid growth of the tokenized real-world assets (RWA) market, now nearing $30 billion on-chain, has largely bypassed the DeFi ecosystem. Only about $2.47 billion is actively locked in DeFi protocols, indicating a penetration rate of just 9%. A major barrier is the "permissioned" architecture of most RWA products, like BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which are designed for institutional compliance. They require whitelisting, off-chain settlement, and strict investor accreditation, making them incompatible with open, permissionless DeFi applications like Aave or Uniswap. This is evident in categories like bonds/money market funds ($16.6B on-chain, $920M in DeFi) and tokenized equities ($2.7B on-chain, $78M in DeFi). Notable exceptions are private credit protocols (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge) and assets like Ondo's USDY, which were designed from inception for DeFi composability, allowing them to be used freely as collateral. Morpho and Aave Horizon also demonstrate successful RWA lending integrations. However, industry reports (IOSCO, ECB) warn that growth may remain confined within traditional financial systems due to fragmented regulations, lack of unified standards, and inherent conflicts between DeFi's open logic and compliance requirements like minimum investments and fixed redemption windows. The RWA sector is effectively split into two markets: a compliant, permissioned on-chain finance market and a smaller DeFi-native market focused on composability. For DeFi penetration to rise significantly, asset issuers must prioritize designs that enable permissionless circulation from the start, moving away from models centered solely on institutional compliance.

marsbit1 saat önce

Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片