Quant蹿火故事:小孩哥直播rug,社区拉盘教他做人

Odaily星球日报2024-11-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-11-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

链上大舞台,够胆你就来。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth

Quant蹿火故事:小孩哥直播rug,社区拉盘教他做人

一天一集的链上大舞台又有新故事了。

继昨日的“大小写之战”后,“跑路的小孩哥”今日造就了链上最具话题性及吸金效应的 meme 代币 Quant(3an8rhdepsLCya22af7qDBKPbdomw8K4iCHXaA2Gpump)。

GMGN 数据显示,截至 16: 00 左右 Quant 报价 0.747 美元,对应市值已达到约 7400 万美元(最高冲至 0.119 美元,高点市值曾破亿),而此时距离该代币的创建仅仅过去了不到 5 个小时……

Quant蹿火故事:小孩哥直播rug,社区拉盘教他做人

Odaily 星球日报将故事的来龙去脉梳理如下。

所谓的“小孩哥”就是下边这个看起来大概十岁左右的小男孩 —— 社区已有人扒出了他的名字和学校,出于未成年隐私考虑,文章不会提及这些具体信息。

Quant蹿火故事:小孩哥直播rug,社区拉盘教他做人

今日上午,“小孩哥”在直播中通过 pump.fun 发行了一个名为 Quant 的代币,但却年纪轻轻心思不纯,在 Quant 发行不久后便抛售了所有的预留份额,获利约 2 万美元。

得手之后,“小孩哥”一度狂喜,甚至还朝着直播镜头做出了国际通用的嘲讽手势。

“小孩发币,又直播跑路”,这种极具反差效果和黑色幽默属性的故事显然不会被 meme 社区所放过。随着该故事的不断传播,meme 社区决定用拉盘教“小孩哥”做人……

在之后的几个小时内,Quant 的市值不断飙升 —— 如前文所述最高时曾短暂突破 1 亿美元市值,而此时“小孩哥”卖掉的币已价值数百万美元(当然这只是后话了,如果他不卖大概率也不会有后边的故事)。

值得一提的是,或许是看到了 Quant 后续的爆拉,“小孩哥”在继 Quant 之后又发行了两个代币:第一个是 sorry,或许是在表达歉意;第二个则是 lucy,也就是“小孩哥”自己养的狗。截至发文,soory 和 lucy 的市值均已突破 100 万美元,最高时甚至都一度突破 500 万美元。

Quant蹿火故事:小孩哥直播rug,社区拉盘教他做人

除了“小孩哥”自己所发行的几个代币外,meme 社区还通过人肉找到了“小孩哥”家属们的社交媒体账号,并就此发行了一系列“小孩哥”生态 meme 代币……

Quant蹿火故事:小孩哥直播rug,社区拉盘教他做人

截至发文,这一场抽象拉满的链上“狂欢”仍在持续,但 Odaily星球日报提醒,meme 本身极具波动性,尤其是以短期故事为概念的 meme 更是如此,请投资者切勿上头。

此外更重要的是,rug、操盘等行为本就涉嫌违法,因此不排除“小孩哥”在直播中的操作会对其现实生活造成影响,社区当下虽然更多是以调侃情绪看待此事,但这主要是因为 Quant 后续的涨势抹除了大部分投资者的亏损……可如果 Quant 没有涨呢?此后“小孩哥”的行为真实损害了大部分投资者的利益呢?故事的发展可能就是另一个走向了。

İlgili Okumalar

Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Countries Still View Them as Gambling

Mark Zuckerberg is backing prediction markets, with Meta developing its own app "Arena," signaling major tech validation. This industry now sees over $14 billion in monthly volume. These markets function as binary contracts (payout $1 if an event occurs, $0 if not), with trading prices reflecting real-time event probabilities. Results are settled by oracles. Prediction markets originated from informal political betting and academic experiments like the Iowa Electronic Markets. Their core mechanism relies on "skin in the game"—participants risk their own money, making aggregated information more reliable than polls or expert opinions. They have proven accurate in forecasting areas like monetary policy, elections, and market events. While Western markets are integrating them into regulated financial systems, many Asian jurisdictions still classify them as gambling, leading to regulatory divergence. This stance creates three major issues for Asia: regulatory arbitrage and capital outflow, loss of informational sovereignty as valuable social data accumulates offshore, and a lack of user protection within a formal framework. The article argues that Asia's focus should shift from blocking these markets to responsibly harnessing the data they generate within a regulated system. The current avoidance of discussion cedes leadership and advantages to foreign entities.

Foresight News38 dk önce

Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Countries Still View Them as Gambling

Foresight News38 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片