Законодатели Италии выступают против повышения налога на криптовалюту

cryptonews.ru2024-11-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-11-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Законодатели Италии выступают против планов правительства повысить налоги на прирост капитала и расширить сферу применения криптоактивов. Эти предложения, лежащие в основе бюджета премьер-министра Джорджии Мелони на 2024 год, критикуют за то, что они могут препятствовать инновациям и затрагивать малый бизнес.

Настаивают на компромиссе по налогу на криптовалюту

Министр экономики Джанкарло Джорджетти предложил повысить налог на прирост капитала в криптовалюте с 26% до 42%, приведя его в соответствие с другими финансовыми доходами. Однако, как сообщается, некоторые члены его правящей коалиции выступают против резкого повышения налога и предлагают ограничить его повышение 28%, сообщает Reuters.

На фоне внутреннего раскола Джорджетти дал понять, что готов пересмотреть свою позицию и изучить альтернативные налоговые структуры для разрешения разногласий. Дебаты также сосредоточены на цифровом налоге в Италии — сборе, введённом в 2019 году и нацеленном на таких технологических гигантов, как Meta, Google и Amazon. Это ограничение призвано найти баланс между получением дохода и сохранением конкурентоспособности рынка.

Действующий налог в размере 3% применяется только к компаниям с годовым доходом по всему миру более 750 млн евро и доходом в Италии более 5,5 млн евро. Предложение Министерства финансов об отмене этих пороговых значений вызвало обеспокоенность по поводу влияния на малые и средние предприятия. В ответ на это партия «Вперёд, Италия», входящая в правящую коалицию, внесла поправку, чтобы сохранить эти пороговые значения.

Законодатели утверждают, что пороговые значения предотвращают чрезмерную финансовую нагрузку на малые и средние предприятия, в то же время возлагая налоговое бремя на крупные транснациональные корпорации. Сторонники расширения цифрового налога утверждают, что он может укрепить финансовое положение Италии. Однако противники предупреждают о потенциальной дипломатической напряжённости в отношениях с Соединёнными Штатами, которые раскритиковали такие сборы как дискриминационные по отношению к американским компаниям.

Балансирование доходов и дипломатия

Сторонники расширения цифрового налога утверждают, что он может укрепить финансовое положение Италии. Однако противники предупреждают о потенциальной дипломатической напряжённости в отношениях с Соединёнными Штатами, которые раскритиковали такие сборы как дискриминационные по отношению к американским компаниям. Джорджетти признал наличие этих проблем и предположил, что сохранение целевых мер может помочь избежать дальнейших споров.

С учётом более 300 предложенных поправок к бюджету на 2024 год, дебаты о налогах на криптовалюту и интернет-ресурсы теперь представляют собой серьёзную проблему для правительства премьер-министра Мелони.

İlgili Okumalar

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

Recent on-chain activity reveals the UXLINK exploiter is actively laundering stolen funds, complicating tracing efforts. The September 2025 hack, which exploited a 'delegateCall' vulnerability to steal roughly $4.5 million, involved converting illicit assets into DAI and Ethereum. Recently, the attacker swapped over 10 million DAI for approximately 6,000.8 ETH and has deposited a total of 14,336.6 ETH into the privacy mixer Tornado Cash in recent weeks, including over $8.1 million worth in a single move. Simultaneously, wallets connected to the defunct Mining Express Ponzi scheme have been converting long-held assets, swapping 5,004 ETH for 8.8 million DAI. Following a separate exploit of the Jaredfromsubway.eth MEV bot, about $5.1 million was also routed to Tornado Cash. These incidents underscore a critical vulnerability in DeFi: while enabling permissionless transfers, the ecosystem lacks effective mechanisms to halt or manage illicit funds once in motion, allowing them to be moved and concealed relatively easily. This highlights the need for strengthened cross-network coordination and real-time threat detection to better safeguard the space.

ambcrypto8 dk önce

Why the UXLINK hacker’s 14,336 ETH transfers raise fresh questions for DeFi

ambcrypto8 dk önce

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit46 dk önce

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit46 dk önce

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit47 dk önce

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit47 dk önce

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature on stablecoin cross-border payments highlights rapid industry growth but notes the cost advantage remains theoretical. While stablecoins offer faster, 24/7, and more accessible international transfers compared to traditional forex brokers (charging 60-70 bps), they have not yet achieved their promised lower costs of 2-5 bps. The primary hurdle is a lack of deep, scaled liquidity pools, according to Imran Ahmad of Bitso Business. He states costs will only drop significantly with large-scale institutional and banking participation. Adoption faces a deeper challenge: trust. Businesses often stick with traditional brokers based on long-standing personal relationships, not just fees. Ezra Kebrab of cross-border payment firm Caliza emphasizes that reliability in handling complex details like tax codes is as critical as speed and cost. Contrary to some narratives, successful companies like Caliza see stablecoins as complementing, not replacing, existing infrastructure like SWIFT, which excels at payment standardization. Caliza itself uses SWIFT for many transactions and has seen monthly growth exceeding 40%. Ahmad predicts a future industry consolidation, where success will hinge on three pillars: proper licensing, reliable fiat on/off-ramps, and robust liquidity.

链捕手51 dk önce

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

链捕手51 dk önce

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

"World Model" has become a widely used yet ambiguous term in AI. Drawing from the classic POMDP framework (agent → action → state → observation), this article proposes a functional taxonomy to clarify the concept. It identifies three distinct types, categorized by their output in the perception-action loop: 1. **Renderers**: Output visual observations (pixels). These models, like advanced video generators, prioritize visual fidelity but often lack underlying physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output the state of the world (geometry, physics, dynamics). They provide a structurally accurate representation for professionals (e.g., architects) and serve as training environments for robots and AI agents. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they determine what an agent should do next, closing the perception-action loop (e.g., vision-language-action models). While renderers are currently the most commercially mature and planners are the most aspirational, the article argues that **simulators are the crucial, underappreciated hub**. By working at the level of geometry and physics, a simulator can project upwards to create visuals for humans and downwards to predict action consequences for agents. The future lies in the convergence of these three functions. Emerging research and products, like World Labs' Marble model which outputs both visual splats and physical collision meshes, are beginning to blur these boundaries. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of rendering, simulating, and planning based on a shared understanding of spatial and temporal structures—ultimately enabling machines to understand, imagine, and interact with the physical world.

链捕手58 dk önce

Li Feifei's Latest Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Claim to Have 'World Models,' We Need a Taxonomy

链捕手58 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot