一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

Odaily星球日报2024-10-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-10-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Animoca Brands和a16z脱颖而出,是唯一多次主导这些高回报交易的公司。

原文作者:Eli Nuss

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

谁在加密风险投资领域表现最佳?

我们参考了 @tokenterminal 提供的筹资数据和 @artemis__xyz 的市场数据来回答这个问题。

查看我们的完整分析请参考此处

总结

需要注意的是,我们依赖于这些数据的准确性。经常会有未公开的融资轮次,或其他公告中缺少关键数据。不过,即便如此,我们仍能从现有数据中获得一些有趣的见解。

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

首先,我们来回顾一下历史上最成功的加密投资。

我们通过计算每轮融资在第三季度末的完全稀释市值 (FDMC) 与融资金额的比值来进行排名。

然后,我们按筹资周期进行分类,以找出每个年份中表现最好的投资。

以下是 2015 至 2017 年间的顶级投资案例:

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

图编译:深潮 TechFlow

说明:

  • "FDMC" 指的是完全稀释后的市值。

  • "FDMC/融资金额" 代表市值与融资金额的比率。

以下是 2018 至 2021 年间的顶级投资案例:

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

图编译:深潮 TechFlow

以下是 2022 至 2024 年间的顶级投资案例:

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

图编译:深潮 TechFlow

在找出回报最高的投资项目后,我们接下来看看哪些基金参与了这些融资轮次。

我们将主导投资者与跟投投资者区分开来。以下是那些主导或共同主导这些高回报轮次的投资者名单:

@multicoincap

@polychaincap

@paradigm

@PanteraCapita

值得注意的是,@animocabrands 和 @a16z crypto 脱颖而出,是唯一多次主导这些高回报交易的公司。

在我们数据集中,超过 5000 个独特的投资者中,只有 42 家公司或个人实际上领导了一轮或多轮项目,这些项目推出的代币在 2024 年第三季度价格基础上仍有显著增值。

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

以下是最常参与这些轮次的基金:

@cbventures

@dragonfly_xyz

@Delphi_Digital

@usv

@slow

@naval

@BlockTower

@scalarcapital

@placeholdervc

@Maven 11 Capital

@MaelstromFund

@lightspeedvp

@hypersphere_vc

@hashed_official

@Dialectic_Group

@Consensys

@1kx network

总体而言, 221 家公司或个人参与了一个顶级风险交易,其流动代币在 2024 年第三季度的估值有显著增值。

此图突出显示的是至少参与了 3 笔或更多交易的前 27 家公司。

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

考虑到一些投资者比其他人更活跃,查看命中率也很重要。我们不仅使用了之前的数据,还考虑了每个投资者参与的交易总数,以找出命中率最高的。值得一提的是,@BlockTower 在这方面表现尤为突出!

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

基于以上信息,我们构建了一个矩阵,希望能为该领域的基金提供一个概览。

这个矩阵是动态的,因为有时一个重大成功就能使基金进入新的象限。

我们期待有一天所有基金都能进入矩阵的右上角。

一览加密VC投资概况:谁的表现最佳?

希望这项分析对大家来说和对我们一样有趣。

我们欢迎任何反馈或建议,以帮助我们在未来改进分析。我们计划定期更新这些数据,因此希望能做到尽可能准确。

İlgili Okumalar

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

Lilian Weng, former OpenAI security VP and co-founder of Thinking Machines Lab, has published a new blog post titled "Harness Engineering for Self-Improvement," proposing a pragmatic path for AI self-evolution. She argues that Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) may practically begin at the "Harness" layer—the external runtime system governing how models use tools, manage context, and execute tasks—rather than directly from the model rewriting its own weights. The blog outlines a progression from optimizing prompts (Context Engineering) to designing workflows, and ultimately to Self-Improving Harness systems. These systems can identify their own weaknesses, propose targeted, verifiable modifications to the harness code, and validate improvements. Works like Self-Harness and Darwin Gödel Machine (DGM) demonstrate significant performance gains on benchmarks like SWE-bench through such automated harness evolution, rivaling handcrafted agents. DeepSeek researcher Tianyi Cui endorsed the view, noting harness-based self-evolution is as promising as model-based approaches. Weng emphasizes this is complementary to model training, with both reinforcing each other. However, key challenges remain: weak evaluators for subjective tasks, reward hacking, diversity collapse, managing long-term system health versus short-term success, and defining the human oversight role. The consensus is growing: the harness is a critical variable, as the same model can exhibit vastly different capabilities within different harness systems.

marsbit9 dk önce

Weng Li's New Blog Proposes 'Self-Evolution Should Start from Harness', DeepSeek's Cui Tianyi Endorses with Repost

marsbit9 dk önce

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (July 8) This is an informal column from Odaily's editorial team, sharing immediate thoughts on industry news, data, and hot topics from various angles. It presents investment ideas and opportunity hypotheses still under verification—which may not be direct wealth codes but questions in themselves—alongside observations from industry interactions and materials that genuinely enhance the team's understanding. The content is based on real investment and observation experiences, carries no advertising, and does not constitute investment advice. Its purpose is to broaden perspectives and supplement information sources, not to create consensus. Team Member Shares: * **Wenser (@wenser2010):** Noted a deeper correction (nearly 30%) in US and Korean stocks, including memory stocks, but remains bullish on DRAM due to perceived supply shortages. In prediction markets, personal small bets outperformed blind copying; favors France to win the World Cup. Views crypto-related stocks like STRK as bearish for now, while seeing Circle and Coinbase as potential rebound plays. Observes recent strength in software stocks like Microsoft but is unsure if it's a sustained recovery. * **Bcxiongdi (@bcxiongdi):** Discusses the recent "recovery training" in meme coin markets on Solana and BSC, characterized by small-scale PVP opportunities, admitting to having sold many assets too early. Suggests also watching the Robinhood chain. Found World Cup prediction markets challenging, advising to consider buying during matches rather than only before. * **Azuma (@azuma_eth):** Focuses on the US stock market, particularly the significant semiconductor correction. Believes demand fundamentals remain and considers buying the dip in DRAM stocks. Notes a potential rotation signal as hedge funds have recently concentrated buying in tech stocks. Plans to continue adding to RKLB (Rocket Lab) stock, seeing limited downside and high upside potential at current levels after its founder's share sale window closed.

Odaily星球日报25 dk önce

Odaily Editorial Department Tea Party (July 8)

Odaily星球日报25 dk önce

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Former Huawei "Genius Youth" Li Bojie recently drew public attention by criticizing his interview experience with DeepSeek. The controversy escalated when Du Jun, co-founder of Web3 investment firm ABCDE Capital, publicly accused Li of being "the founder with the least sense of contractual spirit" he had ever cooperated with, sparking a dispute over Li's startup project, Metagent. Li detailed a frustrating DeepSeek interview where he was accused of potential plagiarism, leading him to end the session. The spotlight then shifted to his venture, Metagent, a Web3+AI project aiming to tokenize AI agents. ABCDE invested $1.5 million, with an initial $500k disbursed. Du Jun claimed the project's progress was severely lacking, with a poor-quality demo and minimal social media activity. He alleged Li stopped communicating, deleted his Telegram, and failed to provide proper financial reporting. In response, Li argued the remaining $1 million was never received, crippling operations and forcing salary cuts. He stated he left Metagent in October 2024 due to family reasons and Web3 compliance concerns, with board approval. He claimed to have fulfilled disclosure duties and that his subsequent projects avoided conflicting fields. Other investors, including ArkStream Capital, shared negative due diligence experiences, citing unprofessional contracts and evasive answers on tokenomics. Metagent's social media went silent in June 2024, effectively stalling. Li has since moved to a new consumer AI agent platform, Pine AI (formerly Logenic AI), which has raised $25 million in Series A funding. He served as its Chief Scientist but recently left, clarifying he was not the founder and departed due to a shift in research interests.

Foresight News55 dk önce

Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Who Questioned DeepSeek Interview Lands in 'Crossfire' from Web3 Investor

Foresight News55 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片