一起黑客事件,意外地揭下了EigenLayer的遮羞布

Odaily星球日报2024-10-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-10-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

草台班子唱大戏。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth

一起黑客事件,意外地揭下了EigenLayer的遮羞布

北京时间昨晚 11 点左右,链上分析机构 Lookonchain 监测到了一笔异常交易,某地址(0xA7A1c66168cC0b5fC78721157F513c89697Df10D)从 Eigenlayer 的团队地址收到了约 167 万枚 EIGEN 后,直接以 3.3 美元的价格完全抛售,套现约 551 万美元。

一起黑客事件,意外地揭下了EigenLayer的遮羞布

该笔交易被曝光之后,社区之内质疑声音频起 —— EIGEN 刚刚解除转账限制没几天,团队就这样子明目张胆的直接砸盘了?

今晨 5 点半左右,EigenLayer 就社区质疑给出了官方回应。

今天早晨发生了一起孤立事件,某投资人关于将代币转入托管地址的电子邮件遭恶意攻击者劫持,黑客替换了邮件中的具体地址,结果导致 1673645 枚 EIGEN 被错误地转移到了攻击者的地址。攻击者已通过去中心化交易平台出售了这些被盗的 EIGEN,并将稳定币转移到了中心化交易所。我们正在与这些平台和执法部门联系。部分资金已经被冻结。

这次破坏没有影响到 Eigenlayer 系统,协议或代币合约中并不存在已知的漏洞,此次事件与 EigenLayer 的任何链上功能无关。

我们仍在调查这一情况,一旦有进一步的信息,我们将继续披露。

这起攻击事件本身并不复杂,知名安全专家、慢雾创始人余弦在个人 X 上给出了很详尽的分析。

针对该起攻击事件本身,攻击者恐怕预谋挺久了,攻击者地址最早先收到 1 EIGEN,隔了差不多 26 小时收到 1673644 EIGEN,都来自 3/5 多签地址(0x87787389BB2Eb2EC8Fe4aA6a2e33D671d925A60f)。接着,一个多小时后开始各种洗币。Gas 来自 ChangeNow,非法获取的 EIGEN 主要兑换成 USDC/USDT,并主要通过 HitBTC 等平台洗完。

攻击者得手原因据官方说法是“邮件被入侵”。估计是在邮件内容里,应该发送的预期接收 EIGEN 的钱包地址被替换成了攻击者地址,导致项目方将 EIGEN 打入了攻击者地址。哪怕是先打了 1 EIGEN,说不定攻击者收到 1 EIGEN 后,也给预期接收地址打了 1 EIGEN,导致预期接收者以为整个流程无误…当然这只是猜测,具体以官方披露为准。

 然而,这起“普通”的安全事件背后却暴露了另一层更为严重的问题 —— 为什么 EigenLayer 的投资人现在就可以收到代币?且为什么接收地址(不管是投资人还是黑客)可以在收到 EIGEN 之后毫无限制的直接抛售?

在 EigenLayer 此前所披露的代币经济模型中,关于早期贡献者及投资人的份额部分曾白纸黑字地明确强调了存在“为期 1 年的锁仓限制”

EIGEN 合约的转账限制移除后,早期贡献者、投资者和 Eigen 基金会服务提供商的代币将被锁定一年。一年之后,上述每位接收者的 EIGEN 将解锁 4% ,此后每个月将额外解锁 4% 。

一起黑客事件,意外地揭下了EigenLayer的遮羞布

作为一个融资规模过亿,TVL 高居全网头部,各大头部交易所争相上线的“天王级”项目……很难想象 EigenLayer 既没有选择使用当前已相当成熟的代币分配协议,也没有自行部署代币解锁合约,而是相当“无脑”地在代币刚刚解除转账限制后立即向投资人地址打币……

从黑客的抛售行为来看,这些地址在收到代币之后也并没有受到任何硬性的操作限制,换句话说 EigenLayer 似乎是在指望着 VC 们去“道德锁仓”……

更为离谱的是,EigenLayer 似乎在收到“投资人”(其实是黑客)关于更改地址的邮件后,并未通过电话或是其他其他形式交叉确认,而是直接放款打币,这才导致黑客成功窃取了数百万美元的资金……

总而言之,这一整起事件可谓槽点满满。但凡 EigenLayer 遵循了正常的代币解锁规范,但凡 EigenLayer 团队的运营素质稍微合格那么一点,这起黑客事件都不可能发生,EigenLayer 也不会被社区口诛笔伐为“草台班子”。

从技术角度来看,EigenLayer 创新的“再质押”叙事扩展了节点验证服务的边界,利用 AVS 将原本仅可用于网络共识维护的节点验证服务扩展至预言机、排序器、跨链桥等更多的细分场景。这对于以太坊生态乃至于整个加密货币行情都具有长远的效用意义。

但技术归技术,运营归运营,从过往的“团队向生态项目索取空投”争议再到如今的“黑客及解锁”风波,EigenLayer 的这些离谱操作正在一步步透支着社区信心。对于任何一家项目而言,哪怕它的规模再大,背书再硬,这都是一个极度危险的信号。

İlgili Okumalar

Deconstructing Mysterious Researcher Serenity's Chokepoint Algorithm and the Global Revaluation of Equity Assets

Unmasking Serenity's "Chokepoint Theory": A Framework for AI-Era Investment This article deconstructs the investment methodology of the pseudonymous online researcher Serenity (formerly AleaBito on Reddit), who claims extraordinary returns by identifying critical bottlenecks in AI and robotics supply chains. Rejecting Wall Street's typical top-down analysis, Serenity employs a bottom-up, reverse-engineering approach. Starting with an end product like an Nvidia GPU cluster, he meticulously maps the global supply chain down to its most essential, irreplaceable physical components—the "choke points." These are low-profile, often monopolized sub-sectors where a disruption could paralyze entire downstream industries, analogous to a strategic strait controlling global oil flow. His primary focus is the physical evolution of AI data centers, specifically the shift from copper interconnects to silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO). He identifies five critical, monopolized technical barriers within CPO: high-precision fiber alignment components (e.g., FOCI), external light sources and high-power lasers (e.g., SIVE), molecular beam epitaxy equipment (ALRIB/Riber), ultra-high-purity red phosphorus raw materials, and Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) wafers (Soitec). Serenity extends this framework to humanoid robotics, arguing that while the AI "brain" resides in the US, the physical "body" hardware (actuators, gears, motors) is dominated by Asian manufacturers. He highlights a looming "demand tsunami" for specific rare earth elements essential for robot motors, presenting a severe future supply chain and geopolitical challenge. The article cites several of his investment targets (RPI, SIVE, Soitec, VLN, NBIS) where identifying such choke points, coupled with correcting market mispricings (e.g., ticker code confusion for VLN), allegedly led to significant re-ratings. Ultimately, the article posits that Serenity's core value is not in providing stock picks, but in demonstrating a paradigm: using deep technical analysis to find the silent, indispensable "physical switches" within complex systems, thereby exploiting institutional research blind spots. However, it warns of major risks, including illiquidity in micro-cap stocks, potential "pump-and-dump" accusations, and the foundational gamble that his identified technological paths (like CPO) are the correct and inevitable ones.

marsbit4 dk önce

Deconstructing Mysterious Researcher Serenity's Chokepoint Algorithm and the Global Revaluation of Equity Assets

marsbit4 dk önce

Cross-strait Regulators Jointly Block Hong Kong Stock Account Openings: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

**Summary:** On May 22, 2026, financial regulators in mainland China and Hong Kong launched a synchronized crackdown targeting informal channels used by mainland investors to trade in Hong Kong and US stocks via Hong Kong-based securities firms. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a stringent circular to licensed brokers, mandating stricter onboarding procedures for mainland clients. New requirements include a mandatory written declaration stating that all investment funds originate from *outside* mainland China and are from legal sources. The SFC also demanded the closure of accounts opened with suspicious documents and dormant accounts. Simultaneously, China's securities regulator, along with seven other ministries, initiated a two-year rectification plan, penalizing firms like Futu and Tiger Brokers for illegal cross-border operations. This effectively ends the previously common grey-area practice for mainlanders. Immediate impacts are evident. Social media reports show mainland investors traveling to Hong Kong for in-person account openings are now frequently denied after signing the new declaration, even at firms like uSMART that still accept applications. The declaration acts as both a compliance shield for brokers and a filter for clients. While major internet brokers have halted new mainland accounts, limited options remain. A few Hong Kong-licensed firms like uSMART, Fosun Wealth, and Cheerful still offer avenues, but approval is not guaranteed and hinges on proving offshore fund sources. Crucially, funding accounts must now be in the investor's own name at qualified Hong Kong or international banks, blocking previous informal methods like third-party transfers. For compliant access, official channels like Stock Connect, QDII, and the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect remain open. Individuals with verifiable overseas residency or status have better prospects. The crackdown signals the definitive end of the loosely regulated expansion period, forcing mainland investors toward stricter, fully compliant pathways for overseas asset allocation.

marsbit9 dk önce

Cross-strait Regulators Jointly Block Hong Kong Stock Account Openings: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

marsbit9 dk önce

Iran and the Fed -- Three Scenarios That Will Impact Global Markets Next

"Three Scenarios for Iran and the Fed Shaping Global Markets" Iranian geopolitics and the Fed's monetary policy path are two dominant themes for markets. Deutsche Bank Research outlines three scenarios linking Iran ceasefire outcomes to Fed policy, with oil prices as the key transmission channel. **Scenario 1: Peace Deal.** A breakthrough leading to the Strait of Hormuz reopening would ease near-term Fed tightening pressure. Recent inflation would be viewed as a temporary energy shock. However, medium-term risks remain; rate hikes could resurface in 2027 if inflation persists. **Scenario 2: Stalemate.** A breakdown in talks and a prolonged Strait closure, but no major escalation, is deemed the scenario with the *highest* Fed hike risk. Sustained high oil prices would feed into core inflation and threaten inflation expectations, while not severely damaging demand enough to give the Fed a reason to pause. This environment could necessitate multiple Fed rate hikes in 2026. **Scenario 3: Conflict Escalation.** Renewed conflict and sharply higher oil prices create a two-way risk for Fed policy. On one hand, it would risk severe inflation expectations de-anchoring, forcing a hawkish response. On the other, extreme oil prices could severely damage demand and the labor market, potentially shifting the Fed's focus toward easing. The ultimate policy decision would depend on which risk materializes first. Overall, Deutsche Bank's framework emphasizes that the path for oil prices, dictated by Iran, will define the nature of inflation pressures and ultimately determine the Fed's policy space. Key signals to watch include ceasefire progress, whether Brent crude stabilizes below $100, and any shift in Fed officials' rhetoric from discussing cuts to potential hikes.

marsbit18 dk önce

Iran and the Fed -- Three Scenarios That Will Impact Global Markets Next

marsbit18 dk önce

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Choose to Liquidate All My ETH Holdings?

Hash Global founder explains his decision to sell all ETH holdings, despite recognizing the potential regulatory clarity from the US CLARITY Act as a positive development. He argues against the narrative that such clarity would automatically grant ETH a "monetary premium" comparable to Bitcoin or gold. The core of his critique is that market valuation for ETH remains tied to fundamental network metrics—like mainnet revenue, DeFi activity, staking yield, and competition—rather than a pure store-of-value narrative. He contends that legal classification solves compliance issues for institutions but does not inherently create the deep, historical consensus required for monetary status. Furthermore, Ethereum's complexity and role as a multi-functional infrastructure asset (gas, collateral, settlement layer) work against the simple narrative needed for such a premium. Looking forward, he suggests that the rise of DeFi and tokenized real-world assets (RWA) will mean ETH is not the only yield-bearing asset; tokenized gold, treasuries, and others will also offer programmable yield. Thus, ETH's "yielding" advantage diminishes. He believes monetary premium will likely remain with Bitcoin, physical gold, and potentially tokenized gold, while ETH's value is more accurately framed as a crucial infrastructure asset. Ultimately, he views CLARITY's benefit as reducing a "regulatory discount" on ETH, not unlocking trillions in monetary re-rating. ETH's long-term value is significant but stems from its network effects, developer ecosystem, and role in on-chain finance—not from being a direct substitute for gold.

marsbit20 dk önce

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Choose to Liquidate All My ETH Holdings?

marsbit20 dk önce

Elon Musk's 'Granny Drain'

Title: Musk "Milking the Old Folks" Author: Nancy, PANews As the memory sector surges with Micron and SK Hynix each surpassing a trillion-dollar market cap, Elon Musk is accelerating his own myth of becoming the world's first trillionaire. SpaceX, with its astronomical valuation, is speeding toward the capital markets. This potentially wealth-history-rewriting super IPO is pushing Musk toward that unprecedented personal fortune and delivering hundredfold or even thousandfold returns to early backers like Google, Valor Equity Partners, Founders Fund, and others. However, to sustain this most expensive space narrative in human history, new buyers are ultimately needed. As massive pension funds are set to be "forced to buy," the retirement savings of Americans are becoming the fuel for Musk's space dreams. Wall Street has begun paving a fast track for such super IPOs. Major indices like Nasdaq and S&P have recently eased rules, allowing mega-companies like SpaceX to be incorporated into key benchmarks like the Nasdaq 100 much faster post-listing. This matters because a vast portion of the U.S. retirement system—trillions in 401(k)s and pension funds—relies on passive index investing. Once a company enters a major index, all funds tracking it are compelled to buy its shares automatically, regardless of valuation, profitability, or risk. This has sparked significant backlash. Teacher unions and major public pension funds (collectively managing trillions) have warned the SEC and written to Musk, opposing SpaceX's extreme governance structure where Musk holds 85% voting control. They argue workers' lifelong savings could be tied to a company resembling a Musk family office more than a transparent public entity. In essence, after early investors reap immense rewards, the potential "bag-holding" cost is being transferred onto passive investors—the ordinary American retirees—through the mechanism of index inclusion.

marsbit23 dk önce

Elon Musk's 'Granny Drain'

marsbit23 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片