FTX 赔偿在即:获赔或不足四分之一,股东“插队”分配 2.3 亿美元

链捕手2024-09-30 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-09-30 tarihinde güncellendi

作者:Felix, PANews

 

近日,FTX破产案最新进展引发加密社区部分人士的争辩和恐慌,先有债权人可能只会获得其资产的10-15%,股东“强行抢先”债权人分配2.3亿美元资产;后有谣言称,FTX将于9月30日开始向债权人和客户分配偿还资金,FTX的FTT代币在24小时内上涨超80%,最高一度涨至2.71美元,现报2.14美元。

新修订的破产文件惹众怒

此前根据获得债权人“压倒性初步支持”的FTX破产计划,98%的债权人将以现金形式获得至少118%的债权价值。

然而9月28日,FTX债权人代表Sunil Kavuri在X平台披露最新修订的破产文件,退款金额以FTX提交申请时加密货币的价值为准,因此债权人实际上将获得“其加密货币的10%至25%的回报”。比如,当时比特币仅约为1.6万美元。

这一决定让许多债权人感到失望,甚至引发FTX债权人的愤怒。

Sunil Kavuri声称:“债务人、美国司法部和法官Kaplan证实,加密货币持有者在申请日时并未得到补偿。许多FTX用户继续遭受精神困扰、恐慌症、离婚和自杀念头,因为他们的毕生积蓄被盗,财产仍未归还”。

绝大多数FTX债权人都赞同Kavuri的观点。一位用户表示: “投票后这么晚才把这偷偷塞进计划,真是令人恶心。”另一位FTX债权人评论道:“我不明白为什么法律不能保护我们投资者”,并将FTX的倒闭描述为一场骗局。一位FTX债权人评论道:“可耻,我们被骗了两次”。

FTX将从政府没收收益中拨出2.3亿美元给股东

一波未平一波又起,让事情变得更加棘手的是,根据一项新披露的协议,由Sullivan和Cromwell律师牵头的FTX Estate将把政府没收行动所得收益的18%捐给一个专项基金,用于“独家受益”某些股东,总额最高可达2.3亿美元。尽管该协议于8月28日正式执行,比债权人对计划进行投票的最后期限晚了近两周,但协议直到9月27日才公布,这也是遗产被允许提交修订计划的最后一天。

许多债权人称此举不仅不公平,而且考虑到他们遭受的巨大财务损失,甚至是“犯罪行为”。因为在破产程序中,债权人通常在股东之前获得偿付,而当他们在8月16日投票截止日期之前以压倒性多数投票通过该计划时,他们并不知道有这项条款。

但文件中称:“债务人和优先股股东各自都希望避免与计划和没收收益相关的诉讼所产生的成本、费用和延误。”

FTX偿还资金将在9月30日开始系谣言

值得一提的是,社交媒体上甚至有传言称,FTX将于9月30日开始向债权人和客户分配偿还资金。FTT代币随之大涨。但后经查证,该言论为谣言,因为偿还计划尚未得到法院的批准,需等待听证会确认。

FTX重组计划的确认听证会目前定于美东时间10月7日10:00举行,届时美国特拉华州破产法院法官John Dorsey将决定是否批准该计划。如果法院确认了该计划,将允许FTX依照2022年11月11日加密资产的美元价格向超过98%的客户和无担保债权人“全额带息”赔款。

根据债权人代表Sunil Kavuri在X平台的披露,大约有55亿美金索赔来自非加密用户,预计以后不会再投资加密货币。索赔金额低于5万美元的索赔人可能会在2024年底前开始获得分配,而索赔金额大于5万美元的索赔人可能要到2025年第一或第二季度才能获得分配。

İlgili Okumalar

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

Daily Crypto Recap: Key Developments Institutional adoption continues: Coinbase partners with Standard Chartered to expand multi-currency fiat rails for institutions via Coinbase Prime, supporting AUD, SGD, CAD, CHF, EUR, and GBP. Meanwhile, Sharplink and Forward Industries, companies holding significant ETH and SOL reserves respectively, are set to be included in the Russell indexes, providing indirect crypto exposure to traditional index investors. Regulatory and compliance moves are in focus. Hong Kong's monetary authority announced new measures for investment accounts of mainland Chinese investors, including retroactive document checks to January 2023. Prediction market Polymarket is considering implementing KYC requirements to address sanctions and legal risks. Major financial players signal deeper involvement. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon suggested the bank might issue a stablecoin in the future. Concurrently, Falcon Finance and Anchorage Digital launched fUSD, a compliant, institution-focused stablecoin. Market sentiment presents a mixed picture. Bitmine's Tom Lee predicts an incoming crypto "supercycle," driven by Wall Street tokenization and AI agents, with Ethereum as a key beneficiary. However, a prominent trader cautions that the current period of investor losses may not be long enough to confirm a bear market bottom, and TD Cowen analysts note diminished chances for U.S. crypto market structure legislation this year due to a worsening political climate. Other notable news includes a16z crypto's observation that most tokenized assets are merely "digitized" and not actively used in DeFi, South Korea's crypto trading volume falling to about 8% of KOSPI's, and the Chinese Supreme Court stating it will research judicial rules for virtual currency cases.

链捕手1 saat önce

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

链捕手1 saat önce

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

For years, real estate tokenization has been hailed as a breakthrough technology poised to democratize property investment. In theory, it promises fractional ownership of premium assets, rapid transactions, and enhanced liquidity. Yet, in practice, it has failed to gain traction, accounting for less than 0.1% of the global real estate market. The core issue is not a lack of tokens, but the absence of a robust legal, operational, and compliant framework that grants them credibility as financial instruments. The industry initially erred by prioritizing technology over investor needs, creating products with unclear ownership and unreliable liquidity. Key infrastructure remains missing: legally sound ownership structures, compliant transfer mechanisms, professional servicing, and interoperability with traditional finance. This regulatory ambiguity and operational complexity deter institutional investors, who already have access to established, well-governed investment channels. A mature model would feature low minimum investments in institutional-grade assets, transparent rental income distribution, and genuine liquidity through regulated secondary markets. While regulatory progress in regions like the UAE and growth in other tokenized asset sectors (like treasuries) are positive signs, the focus must shift from issuing tokens to building foundational systems. The investment proposition of tokenized real estate is not to create new returns, but to improve access, efficiency, and liquidity for existing income-generating properties. For mainstream adoption, the sector must demonstrate tangible economic advantages over traditional models, not just technical novelty. The next phase depends on proving scalable, compliant operations with auditable track records. The barrier is no longer technology, but infrastructure and regulation. The vision remains unfulfilled until this gap is bridged.

marsbit1 saat önce

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

marsbit1 saat önce

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbit2 saat önce

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片