New York Stock Exchange signals move to build an NFT marketplace

Bitcoinist2022-02-16 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-05-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is catching many off guard this week with an interesting and unique trademark filing that is signaling the exchange’s intent to build it’s own NFT marketplace.

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is catching many off guard this week with an interesting and unique trademark filing that is signaling the exchange’s intent to build it’s own NFT marketplace.

A patent from the NYSE has been filed within the past week with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has suggested that the exchange is making it’s first ‘metaverse’ move. Let’s look at what we know from early reports, and what it could mean moving forward.

New York, New York

According to the USPTO filing, the New York Stock Exchange is registering “NYSE” for utilization of several different blockchain and crypto-adjacent goods and services, including areas like “virtual reality and augmented reality software, non-fungible tokens, and/or NFTs, and online marketplaces.”

The exchange could be looking to provide “downloadable virtual goods,” according to reports, and could be looking to build “authentication of data in the field on NFTs using blockchain technology.”

It’s the latest twist in the unexpected road of stock exchange and NFT crossovers, after the NYSE minted six commemorative NFTs last year – celebrating major public listings as part of a series titled “First Trade.”

The New York Stock Exchange's flagship composite index, NYA, has had a strong performance over the past year. | Source: NYSE: NYA on TradingView.com

The “State” Of Affairs

The New York Stock Exchange is the world’s largest stock exchange by market cap, with average trading volumes that are often estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars each day.

Unlike last April’s NFT release, this latest endeavor from the NYSE signals a much broader and bigger investment into the blockchain territory; while details are still spotty, it seems that the exchange will be creating a full-fledged NFT marketplace. It comes at a time when competition from market leader OpenSea has becoming increasingly fierce. Coinbase is now seemingly weeks away from their NFT marketplace, and growing marketplace LooksRare has been increasingly mentioned in recent weeks (despite a rough week in the headlines this week) – and these are just two names among many.

The trademark application also includes APIs and “cryptocurrency trading services” as well. Could this move be the first signal that the NYSE could be moving towards supporting crypto trading more broadly? With minimal U.S. regulation that has been implemented to date, the territory can easily be described as a ‘grey area’ at best for the exchange – but innovation isn’t known to wait. While ‘metaverse’ is the “flavor of the month” lately, the New York Stock Exchange utilizing blockchain APIs in stock tracking, or adopting NFTs at a much more substantial level is nothing to scoff at.

İlgili Okumalar

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbit3 dk önce

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbit3 dk önce

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin’s price has recently fallen sharply, hitting a two-month low near $66,000, with Ethereum also dropping to a three-month low. While surface explanations point to ETF outflows, geopolitical tensions, and corporate selling, a deeper issue is emerging: Bitcoin is losing a crucial asset competition. For years, Bitcoin thrived in a low-rate environment where investors sought alternatives amid inflation fears and dissatisfaction with traditional options. Now, the market landscape has shifted, leaving Bitcoin stuck in an "awkward middle ground," facing challenges on three fronts: 1. **As an inflation hedge, gold is winning.** Investors worried about persistent inflation are turning to tangible assets like gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers, which offer more direct pricing power and physical backing. 2. **For growth exposure, AI is winning.** Those seeking high growth now favor AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits, an area where Bitcoin's lack of cash flow puts it at a disadvantage. 3. **Within crypto, infrastructure and stablecoins are winning.** Even investors wanting crypto exposure have alternatives like exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and tokenization firms, whose performance is directly tied to real-world adoption and offers clearer operational leverage. The recent market reaction to inflation warnings highlights this shift. Instead of boosting Bitcoin as "digital gold," such news now drives flows toward traditional inflation-sensitive assets. Therefore, recent events like ETF outflows and corporate selling are seen not as causes, but as symptoms of this new reality. Capital has more compelling options, and investors are becoming more selective. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is no longer about it being a fraud or failed technology, but rather that **scarcity alone is no longer enough**. It is no longer seen as the best hedge, the best growth asset, or the only crypto play.

marsbit19 dk önce

For Hedging, Buy Gold and Oil; For Explosive Growth, Buy AI; Bitcoin, the 'Outdated' Asset, Enters a Bear Market

marsbit19 dk önce

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

**Summary** The AI revolution has triggered a "SaaS apocalypse," forcing a brutal market shakeout. The key dividing line is the pricing model. Companies like Snowflake and Datadog, which charge based on consumption (e.g., data processed or compute used), are thriving. AI workloads actively *generate* more demand for their services, fueling growth. Datadog's accelerating revenue is a prime example. Microsoft and Palantir, as platform/ecosystem players, also benefit by acting as essential channels for AI deployment. In contrast, traditional SaaS firms built on per-seat or per-task licensing (e.g., Intuit, Adobe) face direct pressure, as AI threatens to automate the very human tasks their software supports. Companies like Salesforce, a per-seat giant, are caught in the middle. While showing strong AI monetization (e.g., its Agentforce platform) and experimenting with consumption-based "Flex Credits," its stock remains under pressure, illustrating that the market rewards *completed* transitions, not just the intent. The recent Microsoft Build conference underscored key trends: AI is evolving from an assistant to an autonomous "agent," and platform providers like Microsoft are consolidating their control. The market's recovery is highly selective, focused on identifying which companies are "fed by AI" versus "eaten by AI." Future focus will be on the diffusion of this recovery to transforming companies and the real-world adoption data of AI agents like Microsoft Copilot.

marsbit36 dk önce

SaaS Battle Royale: The Survivors Who Win All Share One Common Trait

marsbit36 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片