Messari 研究员:稳定币市场竞争者涌现,盘点各家产品和特色

深潮2024-09-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-09-25 tarihinde güncellendi

随着每周都有新人的进入,稳定币领域的格局正在发生变化。

作者:Addy

编译:深潮TechFlow

Tether 上个季度创下盈利新高,使其跻身传统金融巨头之列。但这 52 亿美元的盈利数字也让它成为新竞争对手的瞄准目标,这些对手希望能够分享这一市场份额:

我最新的文章深入分析了快速发展的稳定币领域,涵盖了中心化和去中心化的部分。我们将这一领域划分为几个主要类别:

中心化的替代方案往往缺乏透明度,并且通常只有在有明确激励措施时才会看到高交易量。PYUSD 是少数获得信任并拥有十亿美元市值的稳定币之一:

像 USD0 这样的更去中心化的由财政支持的稳定币,通过空投激励和与 DeFi 平台(如 Morpho)的合作集成迅速增长。USD0 的市值约为 2.5 亿美元,并且快速达到了这一水平:

合成稳定币如 USDe 通过同时持有长期现货和短期期货头寸来维持其锚定。随着基差缩小,USDe 失去了市场份额。但像 Elixir 这样的新协议旨在通过调整其抵押品支持来改进 Ethena 模型:

历史上,专注于最大化去中心化和最小化人工干预的稳定币需求并不高。GHO 可能是个例外,因为它依托于 AAVE 上已经增长的活跃用户:

新颖的设计通常会尝试实施一些机制,以改进传统的抵押债务头寸模型。DYAD 是其中一种稳定币,旨在通过一种名为 KEROSENE 的第二代代币来利用系统中的多余抵押品。KEROSENE 允许用户根据其外部资本铸造更多的 DYAD。用户在其称为 NOTE 的 NFT 上持有的 KEROSENE 越多,从流动性池中获得的收益就越多:

DYAD-KEROSENE 飞轮

- > 1. TVL 上升 - 随着用户希望利用高收益流动性提供者 (LPs) 的机会,TVL(总锁仓价值)上升。

-> 2. KEROSENE 确定性价值上升 - KEROSENE 的确定性价值 (DV) 计算公式为:KEROSENE DV = (TVL - 已铸造的 DYAD) / KEROSENE 供应量。

- > 3. KEROSENE 价格上升 - KEROSENE 的价格应当与其确定性价值 (DV) 相匹配。

- > 4. DYAD-USDC 池的收益上升 - 来自池的 KEROSENE 排放在美元价值基础上变得更有价值。

这些类别的新稳定币在收益、可访问性、流动性、稳定性和资本效率等方面展开竞争。而新设计或对旧设计的调整则会做出不同的权衡:

原图来源:Messari,深潮TechFlow 翻译

随着每周都有新人的进入,稳定币领域的格局正在发生变化。

İlgili Okumalar

Reviewing 8 'Cash Cow' Projects in the Bear Market: The Leader Repurchased $283 Million Worth This Year

This article highlights eight cryptocurrency projects that have demonstrated strong cash-generating capabilities and implemented significant token buyback programs during the bear market of 2026. These projects, dubbed "cash cows," are repurchasing their own tokens, often reducing supply. According to data from Tokenomist, the projects with notable buyback activity from January 1st to June 30th are: Meteora (MET), Pump.fun (PUMP), GMX, Rollbit (RLB), Metaplex (MPLX), Hyperliquid (HYPE), Lighter (LIT), and Aave. Notably, MET's buybacks equaled 71% of its January token supply, while HYPE executed the largest buyback by value at $283 million. Key project summaries include: - **Hyperliquid (HYPE):** The leader by dollar value, its perpetual DEX protocol has repurchased and burned 44 million HYPE tokens (approx. 4.4% of supply) using a significant portion of trading fees, with total buybacks exceeding $1.1 billion since March 2025. - **Meteora (MET):** Its buyback of 336.2 million MET tokens had the greatest proportional impact on its circulating supply, equivalent to 71% of its supply at the start of the year. - **Pump.fun (PUMP):** The popular memecoin launchpad has cumulatively bought back over $400 million worth of PUMP since July 2025, using 50% of net revenue for buybacks and burns since April. - **Aave (AAVE):** Despite facing a major security incident earlier in the year, the lending protocol has continued its buyback program, repurchasing over 200,000 AAVE tokens. Its team is designing a new automated buyback mechanism. - **GMX, Lighter (LIT), Rollbit (RLB), and Metaplex (MPLX)** also have active buyback mechanisms funded by protocol fees or revenues. The article concludes that while token buybacks and burns do not guarantee price appreciation—as market conditions, news, and other factors play a role—these projects stand out for their ability to generate consistent cash flow in a challenging market environment.

marsbit17 dk önce

Reviewing 8 'Cash Cow' Projects in the Bear Market: The Leader Repurchased $283 Million Worth This Year

marsbit17 dk önce

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

Ethereum is back in focus with the announcement of the "Lean Ethereum" upgrade roadmap, described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's third major update. This proposal aims to fundamentally redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles, striving to make Ethereum **simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.** The announcement comes amidst a broader restructuring within the ecosystem, including a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation and the emergence of new organizations like EthLabs. This has sparked a debate among Ethereum supporters ("E-bizens"). **Optimists** view Lean Ethereum as a critical refocusing on core protocol fundamentals: * **sassal.eth** calls it the ultimate bullish catalyst, envisioning a future where running a node is so lightweight it could be done on a smartwatch, greatly enhancing decentralization. * **Ryan Sean Adams** sees it as Ethereum moving from "narrative expansion" to "protocol hardening," addressing long-term foundational issues like security and scalability. * Analysts like **BITWU** and **蓝狐 (Blue Fox)** frame it as a third-phase evolution towards a "minimal, durable, and credible base layer" designed for the next decade. * **gigi发财猪** interprets the organizational changes as Ethereum "shedding old baggage and forming new teams" for a lighter, more agile approach. * **Xiyu** notes that the roadmap itself provides a much-needed new narrative for market sentiment recovery. **Cautious voices** acknowledge the vision but emphasize execution and market timing: * **Ignas** warns that while the roadmap addresses key community requests, it overlooks tokenomics, and competitors are gaining ground in areas like RWA. Timely delivery is crucial; delays could be bearish. * **Dankrad Feist**, a former Ethereum Foundation researcher, agrees on direction but criticizes the proposed 3-4 year timeline as too slow for the current market pace, especially with AI-aided development available. **In summary,** optimists believe Lean Ethereum reaffirms Ethereum's long-term value proposition as a decentralized world computer, while the cautious argue that its success hinges on faster delivery and tangible results to maintain market relevance. Despite ongoing criticism, the move signals Ethereum's effort to regroup and reclaim initiative at the protocol level.

marsbit1 saat önce

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

【AI Accessibility Gap Widens: Elite Tools Like Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming Privileged】 We are witnessing a growing "AI divide." A stark reality is emerging: a tiny fraction of elites, primarily in tech, are using powerful next-generation models like Fable 5 or the upcoming GPT-5.6, while the vast majority of the public only has access to "toys" - free, limited models equivalent to ChatGPT's basic versions (8B to 30B parameters). This creates a massive experiential chasm and cognitive dissonance. Industry outsiders see AI as overhyped and ineffective, unable to grasp its transformative potential, while insiders leverage these advanced models for a decisive competitive edge. The gap isn't just about model quality but product functionality. Free users get a simple chatbot. Paying elites get integrated workflow systems—capable of creating specialized agents, processing complex data, and handling real-world tasks like management, coding, and planning. Demos showcasing AI planning weddings or building apps feel disconnected from everyday needs like managing bills, groceries, or health. The cost barrier is immense, with reports of engineers spending $1000 daily on Fable 5 inference. Elite users employ sophisticated multi-model workflows, combining different AIs for ideation, architecture, execution, and review, completing complex projects in minutes instead of weeks. This divide extends to critical areas like healthcare, where free models are dangerously unreliable for medical queries. However, some argue that for 90% of common business tasks, mid-tier models like GPT-5.5 are sufficient; the perceived limitation often stems from poor integration and lack of context, not model intelligence. Ultimately, unequal access to cutting-edge AI is creating a new form of social stratification, where the most powerful tools are becoming the exclusive privilege of a few.

marsbit1 saat önce

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

marsbit1 saat önce

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

In June, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest purchased $77 million worth of publicly traded crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years. This aligns with the investment thesis that such stocks offer a compliant way to gain exposure to the crypto cycle without directly holding Bitcoin. However, data analysis reveals significant drawbacks. A group of nine U.S.-listed crypto companies showed 30-day annualized realized volatility between 68% and 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6%. Over 90 days, Circle's volatility reached 103.6% versus Bitcoin's 37.8%. Drawdowns were also more severe for stocks like Circle (-51.4%) and MicroStrategy (-48.6%) compared to Bitcoin's -36.4% from its January high. Correlation analysis shows most stocks share only a moderate link to Bitcoin. For example, Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish have a 90-day correlation coefficient of just 0.55–0.58 with BTC, meaning only about one-third of their price movement is explained by Bitcoin's action. The rest stems from company-specific risks: earnings, competition, fundraising, and equity dilution. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the notable exception, acting as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy with a beta of 1.59 and 0.85 correlation. Coinbase offers relatively balanced exposure. Circle exemplifies "crypto-wrapped" corporate risk, with its recent crash tied to stablecoin competition, not Bitcoin. Robinhood's diversified business insulates it from crypto downturns but also limits upside. Bitcoin miners like RIOT and MARA have posted significant gains year-to-date, driven primarily by their pivot to AI compute services, not Bitcoin's price. The article highlights that investing in crypto stocks often means accepting amplified volatility or layering on business-specific risks absent from direct Bitcoin ownership. For instance, MicroStrategy's recent challenges—its market value falling below its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV <1) and facing potential Bitcoin sales for liquidity—demonstrate equity-specific hazards like dilution and financing pressures not faced by a direct Bitcoin holder. ARK's buying spree represents a bet on a basket of different business models with varying crypto exposure, not a simple, lower-risk substitute for holding Bitcoin.

marsbit1 saat önce

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片