4pillars:垂直型区块链的崛起

深潮2024-09-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-09-17 tarihinde güncellendi

在本期中,我们讨论了垂直区块链(vertical blockchains)的出现,作为通用区块链或特定应用链的替代形式。

作者:Pillarbear

编译:深潮TechFlow

欢迎来到《消费者观察》第三期,这是一份涵盖消费者加密货币最新新闻和洞察的通讯。

在本期中,我们讨论了垂直区块链(vertical blockchains)的出现,作为通用区块链或特定应用链的替代形式。垂直区块链提供了一个集中平台,具有相似兴趣和特征,服务于用户和应用程序。

下面,您还可以找到市场回顾,概述主要市场新闻,以及我们的策划洞察,展示了一系列提供有价值趋势和消费者加密货币见解的材料。

垂直区块链的崛起

不要试图一手包办。当你成为第一时,你会创造出良好的传播效应。让你的客户感到愉悦,并在你的领域和地区中成为领导者,无论这些是什么,都是非常有价值的。——法布里斯·格林达

到目前为止,区块链主要有两种类型:通用区块链和特定应用区块链。

目前存在的和即将推出的大多数区块链都是通用区块链。这些区块链可以支持各种各样的应用程序在其上构建,使其有潜力成为大多数区块链活动的最大活动中心。然而,这些区块链,特别是新推出的,往往难以与其他区块链区分。尽管仍然有相当大的改进空间,但应用程序从这种先进基础设施中获得的优势,往往无法充分补偿失去大量用户基础和在单一链内代币与应用之间的组合性所带来的劣势。此外,在 L1/L2 空间中反复推出和发起几乎没有差异化的项目,导致用户和投资者感到疲惫,主要只惠及流动性提供者。

另一端是特定应用的区块链。尽管实验仍在进行中,但在实践中实现的案例寥寥无几。应用链的有限采用可能是因为它们在探索多个应用时无法提供流畅的用户体验。此外,仅为了运行单个应用而运行完整的区块链对这个领域的大多数开发者来说效率低下。虽然正在开发可以减轻这些挑战的框架,以帮助用户和开发者,但似乎还需要一些时间才能完全实现这些解决方案并投入使用。

来源:让你的市场单位经济有效

一个有前景且相对未被探索的替代解决方案是专门构建的垂直区块链概念。虽然这并不是全新的概念,但最近变得更加重要。垂直区块链类似于 Web2 业务中的垂直平台,这种趋势通常出现在市场成熟阶段。虽然通用平台仍然产生大部分交易量和用户行为,但随着时间的推移,越来越多专注于特定行业或特性的垂直平台往往吸引特定用户群体。

垂直区块链为特定行业或功能量身定制,为用户提供无缝的多应用体验。这些平台托管具有相似特征的应用,创建了一个专注于特定用户群体的生态系统。例如,交易 memecoins 和押注互联网趋势的用户与处理国债和收益优化的用户之间存在明显对比。通过满足每个用户基础的需求,垂直区块链消除了用户在不同生态系统间切换的需求。

这些专业链还利用网络效应来支持其入驻服务,解决新应用遇到的常见“冷启动”挑战。对于新兴应用,这些平台充当有效的分发渠道,提供直接接触目标受众的机会,并展示其价值主张的平台。一些链更进一步,提供专业工具和功能,可以显著降低开发者的初始成本和运营开销。这使得团队能够更有效地分配资源,主要专注于服务开发和创新。

来源:什么是消费者加密货币?

在这个主题中,最明显但并非详尽的例子是针对消费者应用的 Abstract 和针对 RWA 项目的 Plume Network

虽然 Abstract 预计将作为消费链提供特殊功能和工具,例如 Abstract Global Wallet (AGW),但它的真正价值可能在于作为综合分发渠道,通过用户人口统计和应用类型的相似性产生网络效应。尽管其详细的战略和功能尚不确定,但 Abstract 在类似项目中似乎最有可能成功。

与基础设施创新或 B2B 服务不同,面向消费者的加密应用的成功远比人们预测的要难以预测。这种不确定性源于用户行为和偏好的波动性及其变化无常的特性,尤其是在大多数服务旨在捕捉用户的兴奋和兴趣而不是满足特定需求的领域。

当前的加密货币环境强调用户参与和新奇性,这使得预测最佳用户体验尤其具有挑战性。在这种情况下,关键在于创建一个实现多个正期望值(EV)策略的生态系统,从而提高成功的整体概率。

Pudgy 和 Luca 在加密领域展现了出色的营销和社区建设能力,策划了引发广泛传播的营销活动,打造了影响力社区。他们的成功不仅依赖于吸引注意力的策略;他们维持了一致的品牌战略和高质量标准,这些都是消费者应用获得长期成功的关键因素。这种承诺和技能在加密行业中尤为罕见,因为许多项目更倾向于快速进入下一个炒作周期。

Abstract 似乎正在定位自己,以抓住这一动态。通过其卓越的社区建设和营销能力,他们旨在吸引大量目标用户到其平台。这种用户集中反过来可能吸引更多优秀开发者进入其生态系统。优质服务与活跃用户基础之间的潜在协同效应可能会大幅提升 Abstract 作为消费者应用领先垂直区块链的地位。

来源:Plume

另一个重要的垂直区块链候选者是 Plume Network。Plume 是一个模块化区块链,专为解决 RWA 的主要挑战而设计,同时创建了新兴领域 RWAfi。通过将代币化引擎和合规性直接融入其平台,Plume 大大降低了构建 RWA 项目的难度

Plume 正在营造良性循环,降低进入门槛,吸引更多资产和用户加入其生态系统。在 Plume 生态系统中,用户将能够类似于当前使用其他链上资产和协议的方式利用代币化的真实世界资产(RWA)。这包括将 RWA 用作贷款的抵押品、质押以产生利息、以其为抵押进行借款,甚至通过衍生品交易进行高杠杆投机。通过支持这些围绕 RWA 的多样化活动,Plume 不仅在代币化资产,还在创建一个新的金融生态系统,模糊了实体资产和数字资产的界限。

请注意,Abstract 和 Plume 并不是垂直区块链的唯一代表。越来越多的区块链正在通过专注的运营、品牌和功能来吸引开发者。随着行业的成熟,我们正在见证专注于构建通用链的时代的结束。下一个阶段将涉及开发针对特定行业的平台,这些平台能够建立集中用户和相似属性及兴趣应用的网络效应。

İlgili Okumalar

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手28 dk önce

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手28 dk önce

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手38 dk önce

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手38 dk önce

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit45 dk önce

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit45 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片