上线 2 天,Fractal 上你需要知道的一些事

比推2024-09-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-09-11 tarihinde güncellendi

流通情况、卷上天的挖矿,还有新机会。

撰文:c00k1e,律动 BlockBeats

特别鸣谢:xinyi

Fractal 主网正式上线已经过去了两天,在我们对这 2 天进行回顾并对接下来可能出现的机会进行展望前,我发现了一个有点让我哭笑不得的问题——

很多人还不知道在哪能买到 $FB…

这个问题最直接的体现是 9 月 9 号晚上 11 点突然冒出了一个叫 FLUX 的「新 FT 协议」,不知怎的老外也注意到了这个咱们国人最熟悉的「打铭文盘」,甚至都有老外在问哪里有 $FB 的 OTC…

所以在继续下面的内容前,我们先看看有哪些可以交易 $FB 的渠道:

  • 目前可以交易 / 充提 $FB 的 CEX 是 CoinEx,这个所成立于 2017 年,之前减半时候挖出来的 Epic Sat「史诗聪」就是 CoinEx 和 ViaBTC 合作进行拍卖的,背景可靠。

  • DotSwap 上线了比特币和 $FB 的 Swap 对,可以链上直接交易 $FB 或者做 $FB 的流动性池。

好了,接下来让我们回顾一下这 2 天的 Fractal。

$FB 流通情况

当前流通的 $FB 有多少?

除了空投出来的 100 万枚 $FB 以外,白皮书中提到的其余部分预留 $FB,首先生态系统金库的 15 %,转出了 6 万枚 $FB,这 6 万枚每笔 1 万枚转向了 6 个地址,和 Fractal 官宣的 6 个获得 Season 0 Grant 项目的情况完全吻合。6 个地址内的 Fractal 只有一个动了,加上 6 万枚其实也不多,可以当作这部分不流通。

10% 的社区激励,转出了 100 万枚 $FB,这就是空投的那部分。

5% 的预售,7 个月锁定期,没动。

5% 的顾问份额,每年可以最多用 20%,没动。

15% 的核心贡献者,7 个月锁定期,没动。

所以当前的流通市值大概就是 (100 万枚的空投 + 25 枚的区块奖励 * 已出区块数量 7783 个 ) * 20 ≈ 2400 万美元,而 FDV 是 42 亿美元。

挖矿——卷,实在是卷

当前 Fractal 网络的全网算力为 243.442 EH/s。

要怎么解释这个数据有多卷呢?当前比特币的全网算力约 661 EH/s,也就是说 Fractal 的全网算力有比特币的约 37%。

我们可以通过粗略的估算来理解得更深刻一点。一台蚂蚁 S21 矿机的算力是 200 TH/s,官网售价为 5400 美元。目前 Fractal 上算力最大的单挖矿池是 MaxiPool,他们已经挖出了 1335 个块,也就是 1335 * 25 = 33375 枚 FB,平均 1 天 16687.5 枚。目前 MaxiPool 的总算力是 3703010 TH/s,那么在不计算电费成本的前提下按照当前 $FB 价格来计算,一台蚂蚁 S21 矿机需要 5400 / (200 / 3703010 * 16687.5 枚 FB * 20) = 300 天才能回本。

希望通过租赁算力和持有算力 NFT 参与挖矿的小散也是血亏。FSIC 目前挖到的 $FB 总量是 259 枚,平均到每个 NFT 上是 0.068 枚。FSIC 只是租赁了一年的算力,如果只按照这两天的情况,那么一年平均每个 NFT 大概只能分到 12.4 个 $FB。

所以,FSIC 的地板价一路走低了…

卷的原因主要是下面这些大矿池跑进来联合挖矿了,也就是挖比特币的同时也可以获得 $FB 收益,因此也有一些比较负面的声音认为大矿池们在「白嫖」。

另外,这个第一名的矿池是谁?101 EH/s 的算力绝对不可能是小矿工,只可能是大矿池。看看 mempool.space 上的数据,好像也没有能对得上的,所以这有可能是一股多个矿池的联合势力吗?

FLUX——熟悉的铭文盘,绝不迟到

9 月 9 日晚上 11 点左右,也就是 Fractal 上线的当天,FLUX 横空出世,很明显是有备而来。打一张要收 0.05 FB,总量 21000 张,一小时打完。

这个项目方之前在 Pipe 生态和符文都有过「创业」经历,关于 FLUX 收费以及协议整体很像搬运 Pipe 协议的争议我在这里也不想多提,因为没有必要纠结在这个点上,毕竟场外价格一度触及 50 U。另外尽管 Fractal 已经宣布不会索引区块高度 21000 之前的铭文,但是这个 FLUX 是一个基于 UTXO 的 FT 协议,简单理解就是和符文差不多,不是像 BRC-20 那种建设在 Ordinals 协议基础上的。

只是想提醒大家,不要太「格局」就行。对照一下 Pipe 和 FLUX 在 Github 上的介绍,几乎就是完全一模一样的,所以我才会说「有备而来」——东西还是那个东西,地方不是一个地方罢了。

这是 Pipe

这是 FLUX

在 FLUX 之外,@gm7t2 已经做出了 Fractal 网络的 Ordinals 浏览器,目前上面显示的铭文编号已经来到了 XXXXX。看到一堆搬运的 CryptoPunks、mfers 以及 Moonbirds 等等,确实梦回 Ordinals 早期了。

这些铭文存在但是不会被索引,我也认为基本上不会有以前「诅咒铭文」的那种炒作空间,大家就看看热闹吧。

但是今天又出了采用了 OP_CAT 的 Cat Protocol,这个项目则是实打实用了 OP_CAT 进行创新,想要了解更多的朋友可以查看他们的官方文档。

有哪些值得关注的机会?

我认为分两个阶段。

首先,在区块高度 21000 Ordinals 协议被激活之前,再有人把 Pipe 这样的东西搬过来,比如给 Atomicals 改个名或者不改名也给搬过来,我也不会很意外。但是能不能炒作起来我不是很乐观,毕竟 FLUX 能起来是大家都还没时间去分析它到底是不是真有创新点,等反应过来以后价格会如何表现,还需要观察。

除此之外似乎在区块高度 21000 之前不会有太多好玩的东西… 虽然我很希望有。

那么之后能玩的东西就多了,我认为值得关注的有:

- 在更快的 Fractal 上出现 ETH/Solana/Base 上那样的 meme 神盘。目前看到说要做 Fractal 上的 pump.fun 的就已经有 Satspumpfun、satx.fun 以及 BVM 三家,都是「老面孔」了——Satspumpfun 顾问团队里面有 Jack Liu、satx.fun 应该是 Moto 系,BVM 就 BVM… 所以,这里的关键也许就 2 点,一是看哪家更愿意砸钱造神盘,二是看哪家能更吸引到优质的 meme Token 发起者。另外也要看看等到 Fractal 真的热闹起来以后网络的体验还能不能像现在一样丝滑。

- NFT 项目目前比较值得关注的是 honzomomo 以及「分型大鹅」。前者从 7 月开始运营官推,热度比较不错,但是我没搞明白的是他们宣传上说自己是第一个 Fractal 小图片系列,这个到时候要怎么保证?后者则是原来在主网上就火过的大鹅 Goosinals,这个看好的原因是他们的团队一直在宣传「分型大鹅」这个事,从 8 月 11 日就开始说「分型大鹅」依然会是免费公开铸造、「First is First」的 10K 系列。其次,对别的图片项目来说也许共识很难转移到 Fractal 上甚至会抵触,但是 Goosinals 这个系列本身就是大家自发用 Dmitri Chernia 为 MoMA Postcard 做的像素鹅图片生成器然后刻成铭文而形成的,当时就有多个链都出现了鹅,没有那么严重的「母链」情节或价值依赖。最后就是华语圈在 Goosinals 社区算是中流砥柱,华语玩家本身对 Fractal 兴趣就高。

那么对于以上所有我们现在可以准备的:

- 买一些 $FB,分到多个地址,碰到新项目的时候多地址一起上,防止单地址被卡着 UTXO 落后于人。

- 对于「分型大鹅」,提前用像素鹅图片生成器生成好你喜欢的大鹅图片,等区块高度 21000 一到就开打(目前看是这样,但还要密切关注官推动态,至于铭刻工具 UniSat 到时候肯定会上线的)

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

İlgili Okumalar

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

Kevin Warsh, with a personal fortune exceeding $130 million, became the 112nd and wealthiest Chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve on May 22nd. A former Wall Street investment banker and key figure during the 2008 financial crisis, Warsh lacks a traditional academic background for a central banker but brings deep market experience. He proposes an unconventional policy approach of simultaneously reducing the Fed's balance sheet ("quantitative tightening") while cutting interest rates, arguing that a smaller balance sheet would allow for more effective rate policy. His ascent marks a potential regime change at the Fed. Warsh aims to reform the institution's decision-making processes, tighten communication discipline among officials, and reduce reliance on forward guidance like the "dot plot." This shift responds to the Fed's current dilemma: fiscal policy is expanding the government's balance sheet through deficits, while monetary policy's ability to shrink its own $6.7 trillion balance sheet is severely constrained, creating pressure on long-term interest rates. Analysts expect Warsh's tenure to sustain high volatility in the U.S. Treasury market due to persistent supply pressures. Furthermore, his leadership coincides with a gradual, structural erosion of dollar dominance, evidenced by its declining share in global reserves and cracks in the petrodollar system, with increased use of alternatives like the Chinese yuan in oil trade. For investors, this environment underscores the importance of portfolio diversification, including assets like gold and Chinese sovereign bonds, amid a fluctuating dollar credit anchor.

链捕手5 dk önce

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

链捕手5 dk önce

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

**Tau Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine for the Post-Moore Era** For 60 years, progress in semiconductors was driven by Moore's Law – making transistors smaller, denser, and cheaper. This path has now stalled due to plummeting returns below 7nm, astronomical lithography costs, and rising per-transistor expenses. After six years and testing 381 production chips, Huawei’s semiconductor team proposes a fundamental shift: **stop competing on size, start competing on time**. This is the core of their "τ (Tau) Scaling" theory. It treats *time* as the key optimization metric, compressing characteristic delays (τ) across all levels – from transistor switching (picoseconds) to data center tasks (seconds), spanning 12 orders of magnitude. **What is τ Scaling?** It holistically minimizes delay/time constants (τ) across four layers: transistors (switching speed), circuits (signal delay), chips (compute/memory access), and systems (end-to-end communication). The goal is to align optimization from process and circuit design to architecture and systems using this unified metric. **Mobile Application: LogicFolding** Without advancing the process node, this technique vertically stacks chips using ultra-precision hybrid bonding, distributing critical paths across layers ("stacking floors"). Results include a 55% transistor density increase, 41% better energy efficiency, over 40% higher SRAM frequency, and a roadmap targeting 4GHz by 2029. **AI Data Center Application: Full-Link Latency Compression** With 80% of AI cluster energy and 70% cost spent on data movement, the focus is slashing communication time. Key innovations include: 1. **Unified Bus:** Cuts multi-layer protocols, reducing remote access latency from microseconds to ~100 nanoseconds – 500x faster. 2. **Hi-ONE Optical Interconnect:** Replaces copper with fiber, enabling 8Tb/s per module and scaling distances from 1m to 100m for 10,000-chip clusters. 3. **3D Folding:** Solves the "interface bottleneck" of 2.5D packaging by vertically integrating memory, power, and optical I/O alongside compute, predicting over 100x integration density gain by 2035. **Re-fusion of Logic and Memory** The AI era, where data movement is more critical than computation, demands tight 3D integration of logic and memory, shifting industry influence towards memory and advanced packaging. **Remaining Challenges** include adapting EDA tools for 3D design, optimizing wafer-to-wafer process variation and vertical interconnect losses, and establishing new energy efficiency and benchmarking standards. **Conclusion:** The era of scaling physical dimensions is over. The era of scaling time has begun. By leveraging 3D stacking, system architecture, and interconnect optimization—rather than solely chasing advanced lithography—performance and efficiency can continue to advance. This is poised to be the semiconductor industry's core roadmap for the next decade.

marsbit43 dk önce

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

marsbit43 dk önce

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

**Summary: The Fundamental Flaws of NodeStrategy, the 'First Ordinals DAT'** NodeStrategy presents itself as the first Ordinals Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) on Bitcoin. Its model mirrors MicroStrategy's treasury narrative but for NFTs, specifically targeting the NodeMonkes collection (not officially affiliated). The project's core mechanism is a four-step flywheel: a 10% fee on all trades (90% to treasury, 10% to radFi/Bound marketplace) is used to buy NodeMonkes. These NFTs are then listed for sale on Satflow, with 100% of the sale proceeds used to buy back and burn the project's token, NODESTRAT, aiming to create a perpetual value cycle. However, the design contains critical, self-defeating flaws: 1. **Platform Lock-In:** As a Bitcoin Rune, NODESTRAT lacks smart contract functionality and cannot natively enforce the 10% fee. The fee can only be collected on the radFi/Bound marketplace itself. This makes the entire flywheel dependent on a single platform. If liquidity moves elsewhere, fee revenue drops to zero, halting the mechanism. 2. **Self-Suffocating Economics:** The 10% fee acts both as the flywheel's fuel and a major drag on demand. A buy/sell roundtrip incurs a 20% cost, creating a massive hurdle for traders. This strangles the very trading volume needed to generate fees. 3. **Ineffective Value Support:** The flywheel is starved. Low daily volume (~$9K) generates minimal fees for NFT purchases. The NFT "ladder" sales are slow and unpredictable (only 39 total sold), meaning buybacks are infrequent. While 30.77% of the supply has been burned, this supply reduction cannot lift price without corresponding demand, which is suppressed by the high transaction tax. 4. **Meaningless NAV:** The Net Asset Value (NAV), currently at a 0.46x discount to market cap, is merely a marketing figure. There is no redemption mechanism for token holders to claim the underlying NodeMonkes assets. Price is set by market liquidity flows, not by this theoretical backing. In essence, NodeStrategy's design forces its revenue source (trading fees) to simultaneously cripple the demand and liquidity required for its own success, trapping the project in a stagnant state.

marsbit50 dk önce

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

marsbit50 dk önce

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

"Agentic Design Patterns" is a 2025 book by Antonio Gullí, a Google engineering director, which offers a systematic framework for AI Agent development through 21 design patterns. A core contribution is the "Four Levels of Agency": Level 0 (bare LLMs) are not true agents. Level 1 agents actively decide when and how to use tools. Level 2 agents engage in strategic planning, context engineering (curating and filtering information), and self-reflection. Level 3 involves multi-agent collaboration with defined communication topologies. The book introduces **Context Engineering** as a superset of prompt engineering, managing four layers of information for the agent: system prompts, external data, implicit context (user history, environment), and feedback loops for automated optimization. A key pattern is **Reflection (Producer-Critic)**, where two distinct agents with different prompts collaborate iteratively—one produces output, the other critiques it—until quality is satisfactory or a max iteration limit is reached. For **Memory**, a three-layer model is proposed: Session (ephemeral conversation context), State (temporary task data), and Memory (persistent, long-term storage). Regarding **Multi-Agent Systems**, the book advises against unnecessary complexity, recommending simple topologies like Supervisor or Peer-to-Peer based on task needs. It emphasizes perfecting a single Level 2 agent before moving to multi-agent setups. The author concludes with three actionable takeaways: 1) Add a Critic agent to existing workflows, 2) Practice Context Engineering beyond simple prompts, and 3) Avoid premature multi-agent complexity; first master a robust single agent. The book provides a practical map, codifying common challenges like reflection, memory, and coordination into reusable patterns, saving developers from reinventing foundational solutions.

链捕手1 saat önce

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

链捕手1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片