Grass 上线空投查询,我的电费能回本吗?

深潮2024-09-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-09-05 tarihinde güncellendi

大批用户被「反撸」,社区成员怨气值拉满。

撰文:Asher,Odaily 星球日报

今日凌晨,Grass(社区俗称小草)在 X 平台发文宣布代币空投查询已上线(点击此处跳转空投查询链接),查询页面仅反映测试 Alpha 赛季和第 1-7 赛季的分配情况,不包括正在进行的奖励赛季和待公布分配。GRASS 代币总供应量为 10 亿枚,其中 10% 面向第一次空投,其详细空投分配如下:

  • 测试 Alpha 赛季:1.5%;

  • 第 1-7 赛季 :7%;

  • 奖励赛季(目前):0.5%;

  • 待公布:1%。

「小草」也算这段时间撸空投热度很高的项目,因此代币查询消息一出,各大「撸毛」社区一下子热闹起来,参与交互的用户们纷纷去查询所获代币数量,但随之而来的是各种怨气在社交媒体上弥漫:

  • 「5.8 个 GRASS 我没看错吧,妥妥的反撸啊,还有人比我更少的吗?」

  • 「批量搞了一堆号,怎么一亿积分就给了几十个币,到底咋算的?」

  • 「从第一赛季开始就开始做宣传推广,一共邀请了 101 个朋友参加,电脑挂了快一年,期间经常开 VPN,只有一个号,总共 700 多万积分,结果只空投了 63 个 GRASS,电费都不够,真是绝了。」

  • 「小草成功反撸,我就是网络乞丐,我是个小丑。」

  • ……

某社区成员查询截图

可以说,目前社交媒体上,无论是单号的个人还是批量撸毛的工作室,几乎都在吐槽小草空投代币的数量太少,充满着怨气。下面,Odaily 星球日报将带大家简单了解 Grass 项目、场外价格情况等信息。

Grass 项目简介

图源:官推

Grass 是部署在 Solana 上的第一个结合 AI、Depin 和 Solana 技术的项目,定位为 AI 的数据层。作为一个去中心化的网络,Grass 旨在通过访问公共网络,提供 AI 模型训练所需的数据。这使得 Grass 在扩展至清理和准备结构化数据集的过程中,成为 AI 数据层的重要组成部分,奠定了其在 AI 领域的基础地位。

根据 ROOTDATA 数据显示,目前,Grass 已完成二次融资,总金额为 450 万美元,分别为:

  • 2023 年 7 月,Grass 宣布完成 100 万美元 Pre-Seed 轮融资,No Limit Holdings、Big Brain Holdings、Builder Capital、Cogitent Ventures、Kyle Samani、Neel Somani、Rahim Noorani 等参与投资;

  • 2023 年 12 月,Grass 宣布完成 350 万美元种子轮融资,Polychain Capital 和 Tribe Capital 领投,Bitscale、Big Brain、Advisors Anonymous、Typhon V 和 Mozaik 等参投。

场外价格

目前,Grass 代币场外交易均没有上线大家所熟知的场外交易平台 AEVO 与 Whales Market,Whales Market 仅在之前上线了 Grass 积分的场外交易市场,随着代币空投消息的释放,其场外价格大幅下跌,现报每积分 0.00015 美元,24 小时跌幅近 40%。

Grass 积分场外交易价格 K 线

目前,社区自发组织的 OTC 情况,在 0.2-0.25 美元有买盘,但根据社区反馈,卖家似乎并不愿意在如此低的价格进行场外交易,部分卖家想要卖出的价格在 0.5 美元附近。

某社区场外 OTC 价格表

因此,若按照 0.5 美元一枚卖出,大部分用户查询的空投数量集中在 10-100 枚之间,约获得 5-50 美元的空投奖励,妥妥的「猪脚饭」。

值得一提,Grass 隐形发射的 NFT 项目 GigaBuds 在代币空投查询消息释放后,并没有下降,而是出现小幅上涨,暂报 2.472 SOL,24 小时涨幅 12.18%。在空投的 10% 代币中有 1% 代币目前官方给的是“待公布”,因此 GigaBuds 价格不跌反涨或许是期待这 1% 会给 NFT 持有者。

GigaBuds NFT K 线图

İlgili Okumalar

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

Microsoft, once seen as an early AI frontrunner due to its investment in OpenAI, is navigating a strategic shift amid increased competition. Its initial reliance on OpenAI’s GPT models has been complicated by OpenAI’s growing ambitions as a direct competitor, rapid advancements from rivals like Claude and Gemini, and the disruptive rise of AI agents, which challenge its traditional SaaS business model. These factors contributed to stock declines and slower-than-expected adoption of its flagship Copilot products. In response, CEO Satya Nadella has taken a hands-on role in product development, signaling the urgency of change. Microsoft is pivoting from a model-centric strategy to a "model-agnostic" enterprise platform approach. It aims to become the foundational layer connecting various AI models—from OpenAI, Anthropic, or its own new "Superintelligence" team—with enterprise workflows, data, security, and cloud services. Recent organizational changes merged consumer and enterprise Copilot teams to accelerate innovation, exemplified by new products like Copilot Tasks and Copilot Cowork. However, this transformation comes at a high cost. Microsoft faces massive capital expenditures, potentially reaching ~$190 billion by 2026, to support AI infrastructure. While its platform strategy shows early signs of traction with growing Azure AI revenue, it must balance startup-like agility with the reliability expected by enterprise clients. The core challenge is no longer being the sole AI winner but defending its position as the essential enterprise software entry point amidst rapid technological commoditization and the shift towards always-on AI agents.

marsbit22 dk önce

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

marsbit22 dk önce

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手57 dk önce

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手57 dk önce

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit1 saat önce

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit1 saat önce

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opportunities in over a decade. Key developments to watch include Chair Warsh's first FOMC meeting, upcoming inflation data, Treasury auction demand, and whether the 30-year yield approaches 6%, a level that could trigger a more sustained equity valuation reset. The bond market's message is clear: the era of cheap government borrowing is over, posing a central challenge for markets in late 2026.

marsbit1 saat önce

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片