Запасы биткоинов Grayscale упали более чем на 60% с момента дебюта ETF

cryptonews.ru2023-11-29 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-29 tarihinde güncellendi

Согласно данным Coinglass, Grayscale, второй по величине управляющий криптоактивами, сократил более 60% своих биткойн-холдингов в Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) с тех пор, как фонд был преобразован в биржевой фонд (ETF).

Еще в январе, когда Grayscale конвертировала свой биткойн-траст в ETF, GBTC владела почти 620 000 биткойнами (BTC). По состоянию на 28 апреля это число упало примерно до 227 400 BTC, что оценивается примерно в 13,3 миллиарда долларов по текущим ценам.

Продолжающийся отток средств из Grayscale Bitcoin Trust продолжался в январе после конвертации ETF, что объясняется высокими сборами за управление и конкурентным давлением со стороны других фондов, таких как IBIT BlackRock и FBTC Fidelity.

Фонд, некогда крупнейший биткойн-ETF, был превзойден Blackrock's iShares Bitcoin Trust, который занял первое место всего через пять месяцев после своего запуска.

К настоящему моменту на этой неделе инвесторы вложили в IBIT более 220 миллионов долларов, как показывают данные Farside Investors.

Наблюдая чистый приток средств почти ежедневно с момента своего дебюта, IBIT сохранила свое доминирование на рынке биткойн-ETF, владея примерно 358 000 BTC, что оценивается примерно в 22 миллиарда долларов.

Наблюдатели размышляют о том, когда закончится обескровливание GBTC биткойнами. Данные от инвесторов Farside показывают, что отток GBTC начал спадать с начала этого месяца. ETF завершил торговую сессию среды чистым оттоком средств в размере 8 миллионов долларов, что является самым низким выводом средств с середины июля.

Биткойн-мини-траст Grayscale отмечает первый отток средств

Согласно обновлениям Farside Investors, биткойн-мини-траст Grayscale (BTC), недорогая версия GBTC, испытал первый отток 28 августа, когда инвесторы вывели более 8 миллионов долларов.

Несмотря на это, BTC по-прежнему привлек почти 350 миллионов долларов чистого капитала с момента своего запуска в конце июля, сокращая разрыв с конкурирующими фондами, управляемыми Invesco и Franklin Templeton.

İlgili Okumalar

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit18 dk önce

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit18 dk önce

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手26 dk önce

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手26 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片