MATIC上涨27%,但长期持有者可能很快就会卖出

币界网2024-08-22 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-23 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:
    MATIC上涨27%,但90%的长期持有者处于亏损状态,这表明可能很快就会面临抛售压力。活跃的MATIC交易员看到了利润,而TD Sequential警告称,即将出现的回调可能会影响短期收益。

Polygon[MATIC]在过去一周经历了显著的价格增长,上涨了27.37%。截至发稿时,MATIC的交易价格为0.5274美元,24小时交易量为7.303亿美元。

这表示在过去24小时内增长了11.70%。尽管有这种上升势头,市场分析师仍敦促谨慎行事。

市场分析师阿里表示:,

“Polygon最近几天大幅上涨,但建议谨慎。小时图上的TD Sequential预示着$MATIC可能会出现回调。”

交易员们正在密切关注这些技术指标,因为它们表明在最近的反弹之后有可能出现回调。

来源:X

长期MATIC持有人面临亏损

根据IntoTheBlock的数据,MATIC的全球资金流入/流出图表显示,大多数长期持有者目前正面临亏损。

截至本文撰写之时,90.44%的地址,即587240个地址“已售罄”,这意味着它们的购买价格高于当前价值。

只有5.34%的地址(34680个地址)盈利,而4.22%的地址处于盈亏平衡状态。这一数据表明,大多数MATIC持有人在目前的水平上都处于亏损状态,这可能会导致抛售压力。

来源:IntoTheBlock

另一方面,活跃地址显示出不同的趋势。大多数活跃地址(79.75%,即1020个地址)都是“盈利”地址,目前持有MATIC并获利。

这与长期持有者形成鲜明对比,因为活跃的交易者从最近的价格上涨中受益。然而,15.58%的活跃地址“资金不足”,这表明如果发生更正,一些交易者可能会面临风险。

来源:IntoTheBlock

即将从MATIC迁移到POL

与此同时,从MATIC到POL作为天然气代币的过渡将于2024年9月4日进行。POL将取代MATIC作为Polygon PoS的gas代币,该代币将用于为交易提供动力,并通过验证器激励来保护网络。

迁移将通过智能合约实现自动化,以1:1的比例将MATIC转换为POL,允许用户继续在Polygon上无缝交易。

升级后,Polygon PoS网络上的所有交易都将自动使用POL。Polygon桥将支持POL,确保Polygon和以太坊之间的无缝互操作性。

MATIC持有人无需采取任何行动,因为迁移是通过合同处理的。

Polygon网络保持了强劲的交易活动,在过去24小时内完成了327万笔交易。在此期间,该网络新增了55169个地址,反映出人们对该平台的兴趣日益浓厚。


阅读Polygon的[MATIC]价格预测2024-25


此外,根据DefiLlama的数据,Polygon生态系统的总锁定价值(TVL)为8.8909亿美元,在过去24小时内流入167万美元。

MATIC

来源:DefiLama

尽管网络指标积极,但价格调整的可能性仍然是交易者关注的问题

İlgili Okumalar

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit38 dk önce

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit38 dk önce

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手46 dk önce

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手46 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片