Confiction Labs推出“暴露证明”,以对抗Web3游戏中不断上升的机器人活动

币界网2024-08-15 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-15 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

Web3合作多人射击游戏Riftstorm背后的开发商Confiction Labs推出了一种新的游戏内验证系统,旨在遏制其认为该行业机器人活动增加的情况。

这项名为“曝光证明”的计划将不可替代的代币整合到游戏的传说中,作为区分真正玩家和自动机器人账户的一种方法。

此举发生之际,Web3游戏正在努力解决日益严重的机器人问题,营销平台Cookie3最近的一份报告显示,高达70%的空投奖励都流向了机器人账户。

Confiction Labs最近从Mythic Protocol更名为Confiction Labs,声称其新的验证系统将通过第三方API、大型语言模型和用户提交的数据的组合对用户进行身份验证。

Confiction Labs首席执行官Arief Widhiyasa将暴露证明视为一种安全措施和社区建设工具。Widhiyasa说:“这个系统确保了充满激情和忠诚的社区成员是帮助塑造我们知识产权向前发展的人。”。

根据一份声明,具体来说,allowlist验证过程Proof of of Exposure宣传了一种“深度分析系统”,可以确定最合适的社区成员来推进游戏的故事情节。

随着申请者接受验证过程,得分最高的人将能够访问即将推出的XPSR-24 NFT系列的造币厂,该系列是Confiction Labs的FICT ONE:神秘世界的一部分。

XPSR-24是信念实验室更广泛的“协作娱乐”愿景的一部分,用户通过各种游戏内活动为游戏不断发展的故事情节做出贡献。

然而,对于这种验证系统能否有效解决困扰Web3游戏多年的机器人问题,人们仍然持怀疑态度。

批评者认为,尽管技术复杂,但机器人往往很快适应新的安全措施,使其长期无效。

与此同时,机器人预防服务Jigger报告称,40%的Web3服务用户,包括NFT allowlists和Web3游戏的参与者,已被确定为机器人。

虽然将NFT与游戏知识相结合的想法是创新的,但它是否会成功创建一个无机器人的环境,或者只是增加另一层复杂性,还有待观察。

İlgili Okumalar

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit1 saat önce

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit1 saat önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit2 saat önce

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片