MATIC更名为POL、来个大的还是拉个大的？

币界网2024-08-14 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-14 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道：

Polygon 作为在加密货币市场颇具知名度的Layer 2 区块链方案，其原生代币$MATIC 近期正准备面临大胆的转型。

根据Polygon 官方公告， Polygon 预定将于2024 年9 月4 日进行主网升级，升级后，$POL 将取代$MATIC，成为初始阶段网路内用于Gas 费用和质押功能的主要代币，$POL预计将维持$MATIC 现有的代币经济、分配和总供应量。

v2-a4c4f1e3962ab5ce01423337f627a54f_720w.webp

Polygon 的转型决定，是Polygon 迈向2.0 路线图的重要一步，然而，这样的转型并非完全是利好，在绝大多数$MATIC 投资人都处于亏损状态的现在， Polygon 的转型无疑投下更多充满不确定和挑战的种子。

为何面临严峻挑战？

先来看看最真实的链上数据，今年（2024 年）4 月以来，$MATIC 的情况非常不容乐观，不仅每日活跃地址数量严重下滑，整体网路增长和活跃度也都呈现出下降趋势。

具体来说，在8 月11 日到8 月12 日，短短一天的时间，$MATIC 的活跃地址竟从50 万骤降至仅剩8.8 万， Polygon 链上的同期交易量更是从13 万笔大幅减少至1.7 万笔，用户活跃度的严重下降，无疑为$MATIC 的未来蒙上了一层阴影。

而根据另一项的数据，目前大多数的$MATIC 投资人现在都在亏钱，从目前的币价0.4 美元来看，距离历史高点的2.92 美元已经下跌超过80%，有将近97.74% 的$MATIC 持有者都处于亏损状态，仅有1.49% 的人获利。

尽管Polygon 官方预定于9 月转型，但数据的下滑以及持有者的亏损状态，无疑都让$MATIC 转型后的$POL 前景不甚乐观。

技术分析是否暗示反转？

不过尽管$MATIC 的市场情况不佳，但从图表上来看，$MATIC 的价格正形成一个上升三角形，如果MATIC 能够成功突破0.4348 美元的次要阻力位，理论上可能会带动市场的反弹。

v2-9202eb1376a7182de327bda76066b45d_720w.webp

同时，$MATIC 当前的相对强弱指数（RSI）落在49.14，处于中性区间，这意味着$MATIC 既没有超买也没有超卖的情况。目前支撑位在0.4，如果这个位置再次跌破，那或许就还会有新低了，可以此处作为止损位。

Polygon 的此次转型，无疑是在为未来「赌一把大的」，$MATIC 更名为$POL 目的是透过Polygon 2.0，增强Polygon 原生网路的实用性和安全性，以此制造吸引投资人、开发商的诱因，但要想在转型后取得成功，Polygon 目前仍然任重道远。

要么是自己实打实的给到用户好处，让链上活跃起来，要么就只能等大牛到来顺势拉升了。

后期会给大家带来其他赛道的龙头项目分析。感兴趣的可以点个关注。我也会不定期整理一些前沿资询和项目点评，欢迎各位志同道合的币圈人一起来探索。有问题可以评论提问或者私新

İlgili Okumalar

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1 saat önce

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

TheNewsCrypto2 saat önce

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCrypto2 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手3 saat önce

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手3 saat önce

Crypto Lobby Pushes Congress To Keep Staking And Mining Tax Bill Intact

Crypto advocacy groups are urging U.S. lawmakers to pass the Tax Clarity for Mining and Staking Act (H.R. 9175) without changes. The bill seeks to clarify that rewards for proof-of-work miners and proof-of-stake validators are taxed only when the assets are sold, not immediately when received. This deferred tax treatment is crucial for operators' cash flow and profitability. The proposal faces opposition from banking interests, who argue it could give crypto yield products an unfair advantage over traditional savings. The outcome will impact network decentralization, as complex tax rules could push out smaller operators. The lobbying effort marks an expansion of crypto's policy focus beyond market structure into tax rules that underpin network economics. The bill's fate depends on whether Congress advances it as a standalone clarification or part of a broader digital-asset package.

bitcoinist3 saat önce

Crypto Lobby Pushes Congress To Keep Staking And Mining Tax Bill Intact

bitcoinist3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片