Swissquote报告收入增长19%:680亿瑞士法郎的“创纪录客户资产”

币界网2024-08-13 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-13 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

2024年上半年,Swissquote报告的净收入为3.169亿瑞士法郎,比上一年增长19.3%。该公司的税前利润达到1.697亿瑞士法郎,增长35.9%。

客户资产也大幅增长,达到680亿瑞士法郎,比上年增长19.6%。净新增资金为38亿瑞士法郎。Swissquote已将其2024年税前利润目标调整为3.2亿瑞士法郎。

交易量上升,eForex下跌

由于高利率和较高的现金存款,该公司受益于净利息收入的增加。交易活动有所改善,交易量增长21.9%。受加密货币市场增长的推动,加密货币资产净收入激增369.0%。然而,由于市场波动性较低,eForex净收入下降了14.2%。在金融领域,波动性是指特定时间段内商品、货币、股票等金融工具利率的变化量。从本质上讲,波动性描述了工具波动的性质;高度波动的证券相当于价格的大幅波动,而低波动的证券则相当于价格小幅波动。波动性是金融交易员用来帮助他们开发交易系统的重要统计指标。在金融领域,波动性是指一种金融工具(如商品、货币、股票)在给定时间内的利率变化量。从本质上讲,波动性描述了工具波动的性质;高度波动的证券相当于价格的大幅波动,而低波动的证券则相当于价格小幅波动。波动性是金融交易员用来帮助他们开发交易系统的重要统计指标。交易者阅读本条款。

总支出增长6.3%,达到1.471亿瑞士法郎。税前利润率提升至53.5%,净利润率上升至45.6%。Swissquote在短短六个月内新增了36000多个客户账户,超过了2023年全年的总数。移动金融应用Yuh的账户增长到23.5万,增长了58.9%,客户资产达到20亿瑞士法郎,增长了103.2%。

该公司保持强劲的资本状况,总股本为10亿瑞士法郎,增长10.7%。资本比率为25.9%,远高于监管限制。

早期报告:2024年目标和2023年业绩

据Finance Magnates报道,Swissquote已设定目标,即2024年实现年收入5.95亿瑞士法郎和税前利润3亿瑞士法郎。这一指导方针是在2023年的强劲表现之后制定的,当时收入增长了30.2%,达到5.314亿瑞士法郎,税前利润增长了26%,达到2.709亿瑞士法郎。该公司以创纪录的财务业绩结束了2023年。

2023年,Swissquote的利息收入为2.131亿瑞士法郎,现金存款具有弹性,占客户总资产的15%。非交易收入58%首次超过交易收入42%。

尽管有强有力的指导,Swissquote预计可能的政策利率下调会对利息收入产生潜在影响。然而,该公司指出,从2023年最后一个季度开始,“交易乐观情绪有所上升”。

İlgili Okumalar

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News4 dk önce

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News4 dk önce

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报8 dk önce

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报8 dk önce

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit16 dk önce

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit16 dk önce

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit30 dk önce

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit30 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片