香港将进一步收紧加密货币监管

币界网2024-08-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-11 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

香港即将收紧加密货币监管,希望在未来18个月内更上一层楼。这是巩固该市作为全球金融科技中心的更大计划的一部分。

据报道,其目标是创造一个安全、监管良好的环境,不仅保护投资者,而且吸引严肃的加密货币玩家。

香港立法会议员邱大伟在“展望2024”峰会上为我们阐述了这一切。

据他介绍,该市希望引进技术人才,建设新的基础设施,最重要的是,对加密货币行业进行一些严肃的立法监督。

地平线上的新框架

邱承认,虽然这个行业已经发展起来,但还处于早期阶段。用他的话说:

“我们仍处于早期阶段。但我们需要建立一个健全的交易体系,并尽快为稳定币制定立法。”

他所说的很快,是指在今年年底之前。稳定币将在香港成为一种受监管的东西,预计规则将在2025年生效前下降。

政府已经在试水了。沙箱测试正在进行中,邱明确表示,未来一年半将很重要。焦点?加强监管,确保新法律真正发挥作用。

他告诉我们,政府将推动项目团队在该市尝试新的金融产品。

许可、稳定币等

香港已经有了一些东西,比如虚拟资产服务提供商(VASP)的许可制度。

证券及期货事务监察委员会(SFC)是发放这些许可证的机构,这些许可证是管理加密资产所必需的。就在一年前,证监会发放了11个Type 9许可证和至少一个混合许可证。

这些许可证有一个问题——公司必须满足严格的运营和风险管理标准。目标是提振投资者信心,防止市场脱轨。

在稳定币方面,香港金融管理局(金管局)将于2024/25年推出强制性发牌制度。稳定币发行人需要在资本、流动性和风险管理方面达到严格的标准。

金管局希望尽量减少他们对金融体系的风险。然后是代币化。证监会已发出通告,澄清代币化证券如何融入大局。

他们明确表示,这些是数字证券的一个子集,中介机构需要遵守严格的规则。

我们谈论的是风险管理、适当的披露和彻底的尽职调查,以保护投资者。证监会甚至考虑允许零售投资产品的代币化。

İlgili Okumalar

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1 saat önce

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片