Polymarket上7个最奇怪的政治赌注池

币界网2024-08-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-11 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

美国的政治动荡引发了人们对去中心化预测平台Polymarket的兴趣激增,用户对11月总统选举的结果下注数亿美元。

Polymarket允许任何人创建一个市场来押注几乎任何事件的结果。距离选举还有不到90天的时间,政治赌注池正在上升。7月,该平台上的活动激增,近4万名交易员在各种池中共同下注超过3亿美元。

虽然分配给Polymarket池的大部分资金都流向了最受欢迎的赌注,比如谁将成为下一任美国总统,但其他投资者采取了更非正统的方法。

事实上,已经出现了一系列不寻常的政治场景。这些是目前Polymarket上最奇怪的政治赌注池,其中一些真的令人头疼。

哈里斯竞选团队本月会接受加密货币捐款吗?

截至本文撰写之时,用户已投入略高于53000美元,押注Kamala Harris的竞选活动是否会在9月前接受加密货币捐款。

对于加密货币爱好者来说,目前Polymarket上的可能性看起来并不乐观:目前,该池只有14%的机会在8月份的某个时候实现这一结果。

请注意,为了解决“是”的结果,该活动只需要在8月份宣布接受加密货币捐赠的意图,而不需要实际实施捐赠机制。

特朗普会在选举前推出硬币吗?

Polymarket用户押注唐纳德·特朗普是否会在选举前推出加密货币。如果在11月4日当天结束时出现“确凿的证据”表明特朗普参与了新代币的发行,结果将是“是”。

目前,这场赌注有超过26.3万美元,尽管该池给出了19%的有利结果的几率——在特朗普的儿子埃里克和小唐纳德·特朗普嘲笑他们正在进行一个“巨大”的加密项目后,这一几率显著上升。

特朗普会在选举日前入狱吗?

如果特朗普在11月大选前在监狱或监狱中连续被拘留至少48小时,那么这个群体中的“赞成”选民将获得一笔奖金。这一池自今年1月以来一直存在,“是”结果的可能性高达25%,尽管目前只有5%。超过140万美元取决于这一结果。

特朗普会在9月1日前成为总统吗?

最古怪的政治池之一是关于特朗普在今年9月1日之前成为总统的情景。

这个日期早于选举和明年1月的就职日期,因此理论上要求特朗普成为众议院议长,并在下个月接替拜登总统和哈里斯副总统。也许并不奇怪,这一结果只达到了2%,现在的几率为0%。

新冠肺炎实验室泄漏美国在2024年确认?

图片:Polymarket

Polymarket上一些不同寻常的政治池并不围绕即将到来的选举。一个例子是,关于美国政府是否会确认最初的新冠肺炎病毒来自实验室,目前总赌注为27.6万美元。在本文中,“是”结果的几率仅为8%。

美国会在2024年确认外星人的存在吗?

阴谋论者可能会选择关注另一个野生的Polymarket池,在这种情况下,他们质疑美国政府是否在年底前证实外星生命或技术的存在。目前约有11.5万美元取决于这一结果,尽管这一数字为4%,与特朗普在选举日前入狱两天的几率大致相同。

2024年,一个新的国家会购买比特币吗?

另一个与加密货币爱好者特别相关的问题是,今年是否会有新的国家首次购买比特币。任何之前没有披露比特币购买的主权联合国成员国都有可能通过发布此类公告来确保“是”的结果。根据Polymarket的数据,超过73000美元取决于这一结果,目前这一结果发生的可能性为39%。

Ryan Ozawa编辑

İlgili Okumalar

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1 saat önce

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2 saat önce

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2 saat önce

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片