稳定币行业如何在山寨币大屠杀中获利

币界网2024-08-09 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-10 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:
    稳定币市值创下历史第二高纪录。截至发稿时,USDT持有超过一半的市值。

在整体加密货币市值普遍下降的趋势中,稳定币行业表现出了截然不同的行为,实现了创纪录的高市值。

这种差异突显了加密货币市场不同领域的独特动态。

稳定币市值创历史新高

从2020年底开始,稳定币的市值显示出显著的增长,与市场的更广泛扩张相一致。

这一增长主要是由于人们对去中心化金融(DeFi)的兴趣日益浓厚,以及稳定币的广泛接受和利用。

稳定币的市值在2022年初达到顶峰,达到1540亿美元。然而,这一峰值之后,市值明显回落,降至1160亿美元左右。

尽管经济低迷,但随着2024年的增长,市值显示出稳定和复苏的迹象。截至本文撰写时,稳定币市值约为1532亿美元,接近历史最高水平。

增加的可能原因

稳定币市值的增长是加密货币市场流动性的重要指标。它使交易者和投资者更容易进入和退出。

此外,稳定币市值的上升,特别是在更广泛的市场不确定性时期,通常反映了加密货币生态系统内的安全性。

投资者转向稳定币,通常与美元等稳定资产挂钩,这表明他们采取了谨慎的态度。

相反,稳定币市值的下降,再加上资金流入其他更不稳定的加密货币,可能预示着投资者的看涨情绪。这种转变通常表明风险偏好增加。

USDT、USDC占据主导市场份额

AMBCrypto对稳定币市场的分析表明,它主要由Tether[USDT]和USD Coin[USDC]主导。

截至发稿时,Tether的市值超过1150亿美元,以相当大的优势保持了其作为领先稳定币的地位。

相比之下,USDC的市值超过340亿美元,稳居第二大稳定币。

对市值变化的详细分析显示,USDT最近经历了显著增长。7月8日左右发生了一次重大跳跃,当时其市值从1140亿美元飙升至1150亿美元。

此后,其市值略有上升,目前约为1154亿美元。

İlgili Okumalar

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

On August 10, 2024, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed an updated technical roadmap, highlighting significant changes in priorities and new focus areas. Key new additions include: - **Strong Privacy Protection**: Elevated to a top-tier protocol concern. Proposals like EIP-8250 (keyed nonces for concurrency), EIP-8272 (recent roots for verification), and EIP-8182 (shared protocol-level privacy pools) aim to enable private transfers of ETH and ERC-20s, moving toward default private accounts. - **Quantum Resilience**: Priority increased. The plan addresses risks to ECDSA/BLS signatures, KZG commitments, and ZK systems, exploring solutions like leanSPHINCS signatures, STARK proofs (considered quantum-resistant), and streamlined verification processes. A full L1 upgrade is tentatively targeted for ~2029. - **Native Rollups**: A novel concept where rollups could reuse Ethereum's core validation infrastructure via a new EXECUTE precompile (EIP-8079 draft). This aims to reduce custom code and enhance security for certain L2s, while specialized chains will continue to exist. - **Protocol Simplification & Formal Verification**: Leveraging AI tools to make full-protocol formal verification feasible, aiming for more rigorous and machine-verifiable specifications. Other notable shifts: - State storage is evolving from Verkle trees to a Partitioned Binary Tree (PBT, EIP-8347 draft). - Some 2023 items like VDFs and certain EVM improvements were deprioritized. - Long-term discussions include blob/gas futures and non-EVM instruction sets (e.g., RISC-V). The "Strawmap" outlines potential upgrades through ~2029 but is a directional guide, not a firm timeline. Key milestones to watch include the Glamsterdam (Q4 2026) and Hegotá (2027) forks. Many proposals remain in draft or research phases.

marsbit9 dk önce

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

marsbit9 dk önce

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

Hyperliquid, a leading decentralized perpetuals trading platform, has seen its open interest surge to a record high above $11 billion, capturing roughly 9% of the global market share. Trading volume remains robust, nearing $178 billion over 30 days, driven largely by the explosive growth of third-party markets offering tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and commodities. Despite this growth, the platform's protocol revenue has declined for four consecutive quarters, falling 43% from its Q3 2025 peak of $357 million to approximately $202 million in Q2 2026. This divergence is primarily attributed to the HIP-3 governance proposal, which allows external developers to launch their own markets and keep up to half of the generated fees. These third-party markets now account for nearly 50% of total volume. Consequently, the share of revenue redistributed to developers, market makers, and the treasury has tripled from 6% to 18% in a year. This directly reduces the funds allocated to the platform's buyback-and-burn mechanism for its native HYPE token, weakening a key price support. HYPE's price has fallen 28% from its all-time high. The platform's growth is also heavily concentrated, with a single entity, Trade.xyz, responsible for over 90% of HIP-3 open interest, introducing systemic risk. Additionally, the ecosystem lacks diversity beyond HYPE, faces ongoing token unlocks adding sell pressure, and is encountering increased regulatory scrutiny and new competition from platforms like Robinhood Chain. While still a major revenue generator in crypto, Hyperliquid's model of sharing fees to fuel expansion is currently compressing its own earnings and token economics.

marsbit9 dk önce

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

marsbit9 dk önce

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

Citi Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Lacks Substantive Progress, Faces Supply Bottlenecks in Short Term. Reuters reported on August 4th that the U.S. government and FCC are considering a ban on Chinese optical modules. Citi's August 9th report clarifies that optical modules are not listed on any effective FCC ban. The FCC's Order 26-50 established two restricted list mechanisms (based on manufacturer and production location), but optical modules were only mentioned once, as an example in a disclosure requirement, not as a restricted product. The reported ban remains at a proposal stage. Citi estimates Chinese suppliers provide 60-70% of high-speed optical modules for U.S. hyperscalers. Non-Chinese suppliers cannot fill this gap in the short term, making the immediate implementation of a genuine ban unlikely. Future regulatory paths could be manufacturer-based (least likely), location-based covering all offshore production (strictest), or location-based covering only China (more feasible but with unresolved definitions). A ban would pressure U.S. AI infrastructure, conflicting with stated policy goals. Citi sees low near-term implementation probability, with the issue potentially becoming a negotiation chip in bilateral talks. U.S. domestic capacity build-out is a key long-term variable. Among Chinese companies, XSENS and Dongshan Precision have the highest U.S. exposure, while Tianfu Communication, as a passive component supplier, is relatively insulated. Citi maintains Buy ratings on all three with respective price targets. The conclusion is that Chinese modules are currently irreplaceable in the U.S. AI supply chain, creating a longer timeline for potential restrictions than the market may expect.

marsbit1 saat önce

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片